Out of interest has any player won the 18s after losing at some point the same year in the 16s?
Yes. I was fairly sure this has happened so 10 minutes checking the lta website did the trick! In the girls 2017 Lillian Mould won u18 but lost to Indianna Spink in u16 in qf. She then lost to Erin Richardson who went on to win the title. In the u18 final Lillian Mould beat Alessandra Ruggieri.
2019 and before, including 2017, the u14, 16 and 18 nationals were at Nottingham in August. Both u14 and u18 overlapped with u16. So players doing two age groups could suffer from scheduling problems if they had a good run in both, and more so if doing well in doubles. No doubt this affected results sometimes. Current system is better I think. The draws were 32 draws then but no qualifying draw that I remember.
Everyone talks about bens height holding him back but i think thats what makes him better
Agree. I love watching him play. When he was younger he'd spring off the floor to meet the ball, sometimes many feet off the ground. Fascinating. Really like his play.
Yes. But ultimately, without a real growth spurt, it will surely be disadvantageous.
Everyone talks about bens height holding him back but i think thats what makes him better
Agree. I love watching him play. When he was younger he'd spring off the floor to meet the ball, sometimes many feet off the ground. Fascinating. Really like his play.
Yes. But ultimately, without a real growth spurt, it will surely be disadvantageous.
Dont get me wrong , his play and ball striking was really good. I was just thinking like Indy to when he heads to the adult game.
Everyone talks about bens height holding him back but i think thats what makes him better
Agree. I love watching him play. When he was younger he'd spring off the floor to meet the ball, sometimes many feet off the ground. Fascinating. Really like his play.
Yes. But ultimately, without a real growth spurt, it will surely be disadvantageous.
Yes. I think it's all very well people saying 'but look at X - he's tiny and made it' - BUT the whole point of that is that it is an exception, a stand-out 'oddball' player.
After all, Dan Cox was an amazing junior - made Petits As final, I remember - and still a very decent player - could probably have gone higher if he hadn't had certain problems (although maybe those problems were not entirely disconnected from his height either - i.e. the expectations on an adult when they've been so good as a young junior). But he's only 5ft 6 (or 5 ft 7 on a good day), and it really isn't a benefit. And I don't think Dan Cox is an exception, or an 'oddball' player.
That said, I completely agree the posters above - he's a joy to watch - with some great skills - I wish him all the best
It's a shame there's no steam for qualis but the three matches I'm most curious about today are:
Alex Okonwko v Ilias
Dilhan W v Oli Hague
Henry J v Seb Harrison
The Okonkwo family have three sons (that I know of). All three are tall, well-built, pretty amazing 'athletic specimen' guys. Also, really nice kids, and nice parents too.
Oliver Okonwko is a very good tennis player, at college in the US. Age 22 now - am hoping to see him give the pro tour a try at some time.
I saw him play in juniors a couple of time
There's an excellent 20 sec interview and tennis clip here:
The middle son, James, is 6 ft 8, and basically grew too tall for tennis - had an excellent serve but then tripped over his feet He's doing basketball in the US college system and doing really well
Alex is the youngest (that I know of). Again, compared to your average 17 year-old, he's twice the size and twice the power. It's never easy as a youngster to learn know how to use that power to your advantage - to find the right balance. But Alex has been playing British Tour and UTR events recently and so the match practice should have done him good. Ilias is a very decent player so I'd have like to see that match
James is playing division 1 basketball in America but I forget who for.
Oli was a good junior winning quite a few grade 2s and getting to the finals of some grade 1s.
Alex is also very good but doesnt seem to play very much juniors and from watching his match yesterday loves to slice a lot escpecially on the forehand instead of hitting it which I absolutely love
James is playing division 1 basketball in America but I forget who for. Oli was a good junior winning quite a few grade 2s and getting to the finals of some grade 1s. Alex is also very good but doesnt seem to play very much juniors and from watching his match yesterday loves to slice a lot escpecially on the forehand instead of hitting it which I absolutely love
Do you mean you love him slicing it? Or you love him hitting it?
I saw Alex recently - and was half tearing my hair out - I could almost hear my old team French regional coaches screaming 'HIT THE BALL' (well, in French, of course, but all the same....)
A guy of his size should be taking the fluff off the ball (not every time, of course, but even if you miss some - you intimidate the opponent, they stand back, you get many corrolary benefits).
I love him slicing it. But I can understand people being frustrated by it. I think its all Part of his game. Shame its not being broadcast
We can't agree on that, I'm afraid
Lots of guys can slice it. And - yes - a bit of variation is good
But if you're a junior who's 6ft 3 and 90 kilos (or whatever), wouldn't you want him just to smash the ball?
I do agree its about mindset though - some players go with the approach 'you're as strong as your strongest shot' - hence, smash it; some prefer the 'you're as weak as your weakest shot', hence keep it in play.
I was always amused that the basic instinct (one way or the other) is obvious in 7 year-olds, say, and it feeds all the way through their tennis careers - I even remember one pair of identical twins who were in a regional elite group in France - one was the first group, one was the second group - it was quite amusing to watch
Junior tennis is all hit and miss though. Someone may be a good player but not amazing at 18-19 and end up as a top 50 player. Its all relative to current ability and chance of progressing which is why to me its so enjoyable to watch them develop. Theres no way 18 months ago you would have put oli bonding as our number 1 junior and being 40th in itf with 2 years to go. But he devolved and its pretty cool to see
Junior tennis is all hit and miss though. Someone may be a good player but not amazing at 18-19 and end up as a top 50 player. Its all relative to current ability and chance of progressing which is why to me its so enjoyable to watch them develop. Theres no way 18 months ago you would have put oli bonding as our number 1 junior and being 40th in itf with 2 years to go. But he devolved and its pretty cool to see
Absolutely
Junior results are interesting and, overall, give a good inidcator but they're hardly the be all and end all, either way. Arthur Féry was pretty much unranked in ITFs when I first saw him, and it was A1 clear and obvious that it was completely wrong - I then learned about his background and understood why he wasn't doing it the way of the others. Kids follow different paths. On the other hand, I once got into a 'polite spat' with one parent whose child was natonal champion in a younger age group - and I didn't rate said child (who now is in their 20s and doing nothing in tennis, despite trying). And then there are the ones I get completely wrong - which I also love to follow