Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 41 - ITF ($25K) - Cherbourg-en-Cotentin, France Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52435
Date:
Week 41 - ITF ($25K) - Cherbourg-en-Cotentin, France Hard


Doesn't really matter but I think you've got the scores inverted, Michael, between Eden and Maia.

However, they both won in three sets, beating WAY higher ranked players.

And, as you say, with a guaranteed SF, and Lissey and Eden in the doubles final too, this has turned out to be a very nice little tourney for our players

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39466
Date:

Yay, great results from both 

Beth putting her hat in the ring re potentially GB #9 or #10 ?

Latest for Monday week, 22/10,

9. Maia : 89 + 8 = 97 + ?
10. Fran : 89
11. Laura : 82
12. Tara : 77
13. Beth : 77
14. Eden : 67 + 9 = 76 + ?
15. Jodie : 75

If Eden wins that match vs Maia that's another 9 points and up to 85 and then a SF win away from being right in the mix.

Of course if Maia wins these additional points she will be establishing a gap for now and as said earlier she would certainly be comfortably into the top 400.



-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 11th of October 2018 03:05:45 PM

__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1854
Date:

cracking job ladies
great results

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Doesn't really matter but I think you've got the scores inverted, Michael, between Eden and Maia.

However, they both won in three sets, beating WAY higher ranked players.

And, as you say, with a guaranteed SF, and Lissey and Eden in the doubles final too, this has turned out to be a very nice little tourney for our players


Thanks, have corrected them now! confuse 



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

indiana wrote:

Yay, great results from both 

Beth putting her hat in the ring re potentially GB #9 or #10 ?

Latest for Monday week, 22/10,

9. Maia : 89 + 8 = 97 + ?
10. Fran : 89
11. Laura : 82
12. Tara : 77
13. Beth : 77
14. Eden : 67 + 9 = 76 + ?
15. Jodie : 75

If Eden wins that match vs Maia that's another 9 points and up to 85 and then a SF win away from being right in the mix.


I actually have Maia and Eden (who had a good run end of last year) in my top 10 for this year - so go Maia and go Eden, I want both to win!! wink 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 20171
Date:

Yes, two great wins, and good points to boost them up the rankings.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39466
Date:

Michael D wrote:
indiana wrote:

Yay, great results from both 

Beth putting her hat in the ring re potentially GB #9 or #10 ?

Latest for Monday week, 22/10,

9. Maia : 89 + 8 = 97 + ?
10. Fran : 89
11. Laura : 82
12. Tara : 77
13. Beth : 77
14. Eden : 67 + 9 = 76 + ?
15. Jodie : 75

If Eden wins that match vs Maia that's another 9 points and up to 85 and then a SF win away from being right in the mix.


I actually have Maia and Eden (who had a good run end of last year) in my top 10 for this year - so go Maia and go Eden, I want both to win!! wink 


 I've got the top 8 ( well in my own order ) plus err Laura and Sam. 



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4585
Date:

Two great wins well done both. Had high hopes for Maia a few years back but its not quite happened. Rated her in the Katie Boulter range. Would expect her to see off Eden who had done well to reach top 500 probably sitting at her peaking ability.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39466
Date:

Time to put money on Eden then 



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4585
Date:

indiana wrote:

Time to put money on Eden then 


 Think you ll find historically Ive been pretty spot on with range and ranking peak over the years Indy



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52435
Date:

Jaggy1876 wrote:
indiana wrote:

Time to put money on Eden then 


 Think you ll find historically Ive been pretty spot on with range and ranking peak over the years Indy


Er, you came joint bottom in the female predictions for 2015, Jag. smile

And in the bottom half for 2016 and 2017.....

Not pointing a finger, all good fun, but just saying....



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10074
Date:

Didn't realise the winners were due to meet each other in the quarter finals and that's good news IMO - superb to get one through to the semi final. With Paquet flopping early and our girls exploits today, there's only one seed left in the bottom half and that's Amandine Hesse who is currently in the early stages of a deciding set against compatriot Harmony Tan who got that US Open WC last month despite being ranked circa 400 at the time (French playoff winner).

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Jaggy1876 wrote:
indiana wrote:

Time to put money on Eden then 


 Think you ll find historically Ive been pretty spot on with range and ranking peak over the years Indy


Eden's got more upward potential if she can develop more of an edge to her game. She has the shots, often just not enough variety, or simply the determination to win. Oten when GB players play each the considered form and ranking go out the window. I wouldn't write off Eden's chances at all tomorrow. 



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4585
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:
Jaggy1876 wrote:
indiana wrote:

Time to put money on Eden then 


 Think you ll find historically Ive been pretty spot on with range and ranking peak over the years Indy


Er, you came joint bottom in the female predictions for 2015, Jag. smile

And in the bottom half for 2016 and 2017.....

Not pointing a finger, all good fun, but just saying....


 Very subjective the points awarded in that, not really a guide. And it was a competition rather than a realistic effort. So that means nothing. A lot of what I said over the years has came to fruition not based on 12 months guessing the order of rankings. Injuries and retirements make that competition flawed.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39466
Date:

You mean the specific amount of points declared in advance and given for specific variations from actual GB and world rankings ( the further away the less points ) is very subjective. 

Got you   biggrin



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6 79  >  Last»  | Page of 9  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard