There seems to be a bit of discussion about Fed Cup, so I thought it deserved it's own thread
Dates: 3-6 February 2016
Venue: Municipal Tennis Centre
City: Eilat, Israel
Surface: Hard court - outdoor
Seems a lot shorter competition than normal.
TEAMS
Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Estonia Georgia Great Britain Hungary Israel Latvia Portugal South Africa Sweden Turkey Ukraine
Format
Round-robin basis. Two pools of three nations and two pools of four nations (Pools A, B, C and D).
The winner of Pool A will play-off against the winner of Pool C and the winner of Pool B will play-off against the winner of Pool D to determine which two nations will advance to the World Group II play-offs.
The bottom-placed nations in Pool A and Pool B will play-off against the bottom-placed nations in Pool C and Pool D to determine which two nations will be relegated to Europe/Africa Zone Group II in 2017.
Two promoted. Two relegated.
-- Edited by paulisi on Monday 28th of December 2015 10:28:03 AM
If those are the seedings, group 2 looks particularly nasty. I would only fancy Turkey of those four. Ukraine have had a bit of a resurgence last year. Belgium have a lot of depth and Bulgaria will always be dangerous with Pironkova in the side.
Squad announced as Watson, Konta, Smith, Rae, Robson and Swan.
Seems a waste of time for Laura, as she presumably won't be in the final playing 4 and surely she needs to actually play proper matches and have a run of lower level tournaments.
-- Edited by Long time reader on Monday 4th of January 2016 03:05:47 PM
Yes, seems on the face of it an unnecessary diversion for Laura, but I am sure Judy and Laura must have discussed it so presumably they see pluses.
Certainly looks like being Jo, Heather and Jossanna again, and the doubles girls did well last year. My preference for the week remains ideally 3 singles players in the team of 4, especially when some have such doubles capability. Last year we simply lacked a third singles player at a good enough level, so ultimately the selection made sense, and we had to hope Jo and Heather stayed healthy. This year we do have Naomi, so it does suggest the LTA / Broady issues have played a part here in some way. Ongoing pity if so.
-- Edited by indiana on Monday 4th of January 2016 04:09:18 PM
I would expect Laura's nomination is more of a token gesture than anything else. Also, she might need to be available for selection to be eligible for the Olympics (even though the possibility of Laura qualifying is remote). Katie will be going for the experience and Jo, Heather and Jossanna will form the main squad barring injury.
Yes, seems on the face of it an unnecessary diversion for Laura, but I am sure Judy and Laura must have discussed it so presumably they see pluses.
Certainly looks like being Jo, Heather and Jossanna again, and the doubles girls did well last year. My preference for the week remains ideally 3 singles players in the team of 4, especially when some have such doubles capability. Last year we simply lacked a third singles player at a good enough level, so ultimately the selection made sense, and we had to hope Jo and Heather stayed healthy. This year we do have Naomi, so it does suggest the LTA / Broady issues have played a part here in some way. Ongoing pity if so.
I know what you mean about cover, but personally I would rather have a specialist doubles pair and let them concentrate on the doubles and the singles players concentrate on the singles Joss & Anna went 3-0 last year, while Joss & Heather went 0-2 the year before.
Although I would definitely want Naomi in reserve in case something happens before it starts, so I would agree it seems she is not available for selection.
I would expect Laura's nomination is more of a token gesture than anything else. Also, she might need to be available for selection to be eligible for the Olympics (even though the possibility of Laura qualifying is remote). Katie will be going for the experience and Jo, Heather and Jossanna will form the main squad barring injury.
I think she's planning on using her SR to get in to the Olympics.
I would expect Laura's nomination is more of a token gesture than anything else. Also, she might need to be available for selection to be eligible for the Olympics (even though the possibility of Laura qualifying is remote). Katie will be going for the experience and Jo, Heather and Jossanna will form the main squad barring injury.
I think she's planning on using her SR to get in to the Olympics.
Is that an option ? If so it's a definite yes I would say.