I am then still left wondering who the guys and girls are trying to impress for "financial support" by getting into the top 100 largely on the back of far away "weaker" tournaments, at no doubt great expense, if we are agreed that the LTA shouldn't be and aren't rankings driven and certainly can recognise the real worth of wins and rankings.
They could be doing it to impress US colleges as part of their 'cv', although the universal rating now highlights those who have chased weaker opponents; or to attract other sponsorship; or to have the experience of playing in the junior slams (this can be a real motivator in the junior ranks); or most likely because in the past the LTA has spent a fortune on 'its' juniors chasing points around the world thus establishing a poor template of what you need to do to succeed as a UK junior. Incidentally, the last point is why I think so many LTA top juniors in the past have not moved easily into the adult game - the focus on chasing junior points for as long as possible meant the move to the adult game was abrupt and confidence-sapping.
I agree with you, The O, about the absolute focus on junior ranking points being the reason why moving up to adult tennis was always so difficult for our juniors.
The junior rankings, on a like for like basis, were very misleading. You had a British player, ranked 30, who was playing every junior match he could get to, and barely had an adult match on his results sheet, and a foreign player ranked about the same who was playing adult matches (team, top money events, ITF) just as much as junior ones. No real surprise as to who finds adult tennis the easier jump. (Not a blanket statement obviously, but overall). Staying in school, I also think, is factor.
Hopefully, the LTA has a more sensible approach now.
But it's also reasonable that the kids want to get points to try and make the Grand Slams (either as MD or qualifiers), which gets coverage and is a big achievement in itself, to pit themselves against the best.
The other problem for the British kids is that they don't have much choice. Apart from the (relatively few) ITFs, and some of the (relatively few) British Tour events, there is no tennis of the right level. And all requires time off school (i.e. no top level team tennis that is only on the weekend). And all is dictated by location (i.e. there's one Tour event, one location), never going to be convenient for all, whereas in France or Germany there will be 15-25 money tournaments of about the right standard in any one week (and probably 30-40 if you go down a notch to Tour qualifier level) so it's easy to choose one that works for you.
I agree with you Coup we don't have as many tournaments of the right standard as Germany and France. However the British kids do have a choice, they could choose to do the money tournaments of the right level in France and Germany. They could choose to play the stronger tournaments in Europe (some of them do!) which would be more beneficial for their long term development and definitely less expensive than travelling the globe to gain guaranteed success. Unfortunately some of our highest ranked players are more focused on short term success, they're not seeing the bigger picture.
I can understand them wanting to get enough points to play the Slams, but if you haven't played and had some success at stronger junior or men's money tournaments against the best players, your just happy to be there.... rather than in it to win it.
Yes it is very important to keep things in perspective, different routes suit different players and if your miserable at 12 because of your hobby it is time for a change. I see this story as a success and sensible parenting.
A consideration is that the mental toughness of dealing with all the nonsense cheating, pushiness etc and not letting it phase you is probably a key component of building resilience.
As I can't see any sign of Maia on any entry lists, I presume she's decided to accept that she won't have sufficient points remaining to play the French Open juniors, and is likely only to play one final Juniors tournament at Wimbledon, on a wildcard.
Interesting to see the slightly different timings of surges in rankings dependent on the academic commitments of the players and timings of birthdays. A little hard to be precise as a number having been living and training overseas, but those in the UK in full time school turning 16 after September have different commitments in any given year to those born in the same year but earlier.