Only Akhenaten got that Nadal would beat Murray (he should be deducted points for being unpatriotic) GC77 and Andyjmr were the only ones to predict a Gonzalez win, the rest of us went for Blake. Of the four to only get 1 right, 2 were Haas and 2 were Davydenko. I (the only one to get 2/4) got both those two.
-- Edited by imoen at 16:27, 2007-01-22
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
I'm afraid I'm away from my computer until late this evening so I won't be able to update the table for a while. I know I've got 32/32 if that helps anyone
Please be patient with me.
-- Edited by imoen at 12:24, 2007-01-23
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
I'm afraid I'm away from my computer until late this evening so I won't be able to update the table for a while. I know I've got 32/32 if that helps anyone
Please be patient with me.
-- Edited by imoen at 12:24, 2007-01-23
Patient with you......your doing fab job so absolutely no problems with that....
Im 32/32 so far with both Roddick and Fed winning.......if all my picks win right through to Fed lifting the trophy then I will end up with 317. Much more than I got at the USO but will end up mid table.
A very boring day today. Only GC77, Mkkreuk and Andjmr got 16. They had chosen Djokovic, Stepanek and Ljubicic to reach the semis.In terms of movement up/down the table, Andyjmr dropped three places (so Imoen, RobC and Vonce gained one each) but everyone else remained the same.
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
As you can see we did terribly. Vonce and Akhenaten correctly predicted Haas to reach the semis, but the reset of us failed to get anyone right. Most thought Murray v. Davydenko would be the second sf, or at least that one of those two would get through. Other than that, Blake cropped up a few times, Berdych a couple and Mackin and Malisse both have a supporter in our midst.
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
I'll update the table with both semis results tomorrow, after the Gonzo/Haas match. Anyone desperate to know how they're doing let me know and there's a chance I'll answer your question
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
Three of us thought that Roddick would beat Federer. Oh well, maybe next time None of us thought that Gonzalez would win through to the final. We actually agreed pretty much that the bottom half was between Blake, Davydenko and Murray. Interestingly none of them got to even the semis so shows how much we know!
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
Thanks very much for running the competition, Bethan, it's been fun. Not quite as fun as the USO last year (but that's just me LOL) - intriguing that the winner had 331 points, I think I had 330 back then. No doubt if Fed ever loses a GS, it'll take a lot less points to win this competition.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!