But may well also be because Anna P has calculated that she won't get an SE place in the US Open MD and so needs to get there for qualis
My livescore page has Mark with a tick for having won - but the score showing he lost in 3 sets - I'm guessing the score is more reliable but I've no real basis for this
I also thing Rhys and Mark have pulled out of their doubles too - but again it's not clear on the site
Our posts crossed (or I took a long time checking). Anyway in the last few minutes ITF has Mark/Rhys through by w/o rather than withdrawing
It looks like Mark has joined Rhys in the boys semis. I say looks like, as the tournament website shows Mark with a winner's tick, but a scoreline in the Spaniard's favour. However the ITF has a reversed scoreline in Mark's favour
Dani+ have given a walkover in doubles - don't know the reason, as both are in the US Open main draw. Anna Pircher did not play singles, despite being in the acceptances, so might be nursing a niggle. Hollie and the boys doubles are later tonight.
Boys QF
(5) Mark Ceban d. (14) Valentin Gonzalez-Galino (ESP) 4-6 6-3 6-4 (15) Rhys Lawlor d. (8) Kanta Watanabe (JPN) 7-6(5) 6-1
SF
(5) Mark Ceban v Marcel Latak (USA) (7) Kai Thompson (HKG) or (3) Tito Chavez (ESP) v (15) Rhys Lawlor
Girls QF
(6) Daniella Britton d. (16) Nancy Lee (USA) 4-6 6-0 6-4 (9) Hollie Smart v (2) Renee Alame (AUS)
SF
Andrea Cabio (CAN) v (6) Daniella Britton (4) Antonina Sushkova (UKR) v (9) Hollie Smart or (2) Renee Alame (AUS)
Doubles SF
Allegre/Cabio (USA/CAN) d. (5) Britton/Pircher (GBR/AUT) w/o
The match was moved inside, because of the weather, but that suited our Hollie just fine
The 4th seed, Sushova, is a far stronger prospect that the 2nd seed (IMO)
But it's a great week for the British contingent, no matter what happens now - two players in the boys semis, two players in the girls semis, a GB pair in the boys doubles final and a GB pair in the girls doubles semis who would have had an excellent chance of maing the final but had to withdraw
I realise that re Hannah and her junior ranking. Nonetheless, I guess reaching number one officially would be a milestone for Dani - or maybe it wouldn't - regardless of Hannah's situation. i.e. the junior rankings get posted each week on here and show Hannah as number one with no asterisk saying "not really" , so if and when Dani takes over that spot, I guess it has some meaning if only from a being top of the ladder perspective. If the point of the list is to show where players are ranked, then Dani going to the top has some meaning, however asterisked it may be!
Would this weeks performance be enough for Dani to move ahead of Hannah K to junior number one?
Personally, I don't think of Hannah as our junior number one
She doesn't play juniors and hasn't done so for over a year now
I think Hannah only has a junior ranking because her points from last year's USO and tour finals haven't dropped off yet.
Yes, and more than half of these go in the next rankings ( with her US Open points dropping off ), so FWIW ( not a lot in regards to moving ahead of Hannah, but with the overall GB #1 spot not to sniffed at ) Hannah will drop right down and the #1 spot is up for grabs here between Dani and Hollie.
-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 3rd of September 2026 03:45:34 PM
In the 40 year history of the event there have only been 3 British winners - most recently Mimi Xu (2023) and before that Marcus Willis (2008) and Andy Murray (2003). Mimi's win was in the only all British final so far (against Hannah Klugman) and there are two chances of achieving a second one this evening.
In the 40 year history of the event there have only been 3 British winners - most recently Mimi Xu (2023) and before that Marcus Willis (2008) and Andy Murray (2003). Mimi's win was in the only all British final so far (against Hannah Klugman) and there are two chances of achieving a second one this evening.
The chances have just improved as Rhys has won by retirement 1-1 rtd in the opening match