British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: How many British main draw wins will we get at Wimbledon 2025?
How many wins will British players get at Wimbledon? [32 vote(s)]

31 or less
3.1%
32
0.0%
33
3.1%
34
3.1%
35
0.0%
36
3.1%
37
3.1%
38
6.3%
39
6.3%
40
6.3%
41
9.4%
42
6.3%
43
6.3%
44
9.4%
45
6.3%
46
6.3%
47
6.3%
48
6.3%
49
3.1%
50 or more
6.3%


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42544
Date:
How many British main draw wins will we get at Wimbledon 2025?


What, what, how, where?

Going to be pointless too in the overall Slam points thingy.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 46843
Date:

indiana wrote:

What, what, how, where?

Going to be pointless too in the overall Slam points thingy.


 Not necessarily - remember its the closest up or down so you could be in the top ten still, if the wins creep up a bit. Its wide open still Id sa. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 46843
Date:

indiana wrote:

What, what, how, where?

Going to be pointless too in the overall Slam points thingy.


 Actually wed have to land on 45 for you to be in the top 10, so probabky unlikely ! 

Will make the US Open competitive! 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42544
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
indiana wrote:

What, what, how, where?

Going to be pointless too in the overall Slam points thingy.


 Actually wed have to land on 45 for you to be in the top 10, so probabky unlikely ! 

Will make the US Open competitive! 


Rather, given there are a total of 10 folk on 44, 45 and 46. So folk who voted for 47 will be pointless.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 26055
Date:

XD results - Joe wins, but Neal loses a tight match.

__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 8194
Date:

So we are on 35.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 46843
Date:

Jan wrote:

So we are on 35.


 We are! 1 more to equal FO



__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 566
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
indiana wrote:

What, what, how, where?

Going to be pointless too in the overall Slam points thingy.


 Actually wed have to land on 45 for you to be in the top 10, so probabky unlikely ! 

Will make the US Open competitive! 


 Aren't they doing the mixed doubles comp before the main event.  It will make comparisons with previous years useless. And do we include the separate competition in our prediction competition?



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 46843
Date:

miriam abc wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
indiana wrote:

What, what, how, where?

Going to be pointless too in the overall Slam points thingy.


 Actually wed have to land on 45 for you to be in the top 10, so probabky unlikely ! 

Will make the US Open competitive! 


 Aren't they doing the mixed doubles comp before the main event.  It will make comparisons with previous years useless. And do we include the separate competition in our prediction competition?


Interesting - and to be honest I havent thought about it. There may only be one Brit in it, Emma, and not thought about whether to include it. Regardless, we will do a US Open for sure, including or excluding mixed.  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 46843
Date:

But my instinct is, if it is to be the official US Open mixed a few days before, even with a 16 player field, to include it as counting towards our wins tally, even if there is just one British player in it.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 46843
Date:

35 Wimbledont

36 Sliced Backhand
37 Elegant Point
38 JonH, Bob In Spain
39 DF, Danten
40 Sheddie, Coup Droit
41 goldfish, Var
42 Brendan F, Jan
43 Ballavong, Blue Belle
44 Dodrade, Bagel, 9Vicman, Vhughes

runners and riders left in. 19 people left in, still a fair few. Remember,

last year was 40 wins, we could be quite close to that. 

 

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 46843
Date:

Our Wimbledon average over the period weve counted is 35.6 so we are in that area now. So not a bad year so far with a few more to come, hopefully

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42544
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:

Our Wimbledon average over the period weve counted is 35.6 so we are in that area now. So not a bad year so far with a few more to come, hopefully


 Hmm, not great though. Considering the relative current level of pur players, and to an extent other recent Slams, I think they should really be on about 47 this year 

Though, as has been said, 2 or 3 players have given us significant hits against probably many folks' expectations, which can just happen. So in the end I guess we are indeed probably looking at - not bad.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 46843
Date:

indiana wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:

Our Wimbledon average over the period weve counted is 35.6 so we are in that area now. So not a bad year so far with a few more to come, hopefully


 Hmm, not great though. Considering the relative current level of pur players, and to an extent other recent Slams, I think they should really be on about 47 this year 

Though, as has been said, 2 or 3 players have given us significant hits against probably many folks' expectations, which can just happen. So in the end I guess we are indeed probably looking at - not bad.


 I think with what is left, if we can touch on 40, as it was last year, we would probably say it has been decent enough - 40 wins with a doubles title thrown in!  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57900
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
indiana wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:

Our Wimbledon average over the period weve counted is 35.6 so we are in that area now. So not a bad year so far with a few more to come, hopefully


 Hmm, not great though. Considering the relative current level of pur players, and to an extent other recent Slams, I think they should really be on about 47 this year 

Though, as has been said, 2 or 3 players have given us significant hits against probably many folks' expectations, which can just happen. So in the end I guess we are indeed probably looking at - not bad.


 I think with what is left, if we can touch on 40, as it was last year, we would probably say it has been decent enough - 40 wins with a doubles title thrown in!  


 Indeed, 40 would be very decent indeed biggrin



__________________
«First  <  114 15 16 17 18  >  Last»  | Page of 18  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard