Going to be pointless too in the overall Slam points thingy.
Actually wed have to land on 45 for you to be in the top 10, so probabky unlikely !
Will make the US Open competitive!
Aren't they doing the mixed doubles comp before the main event. It will make comparisons with previous years useless. And do we include the separate competition in our prediction competition?
Going to be pointless too in the overall Slam points thingy.
Actually wed have to land on 45 for you to be in the top 10, so probabky unlikely !
Will make the US Open competitive!
Aren't they doing the mixed doubles comp before the main event. It will make comparisons with previous years useless. And do we include the separate competition in our prediction competition?
Interesting - and to be honest I havent thought about it. There may only be one Brit in it, Emma, and not thought about whether to include it. Regardless, we will do a US Open for sure, including or excluding mixed.
But my instinct is, if it is to be the official US Open mixed a few days before, even with a 16 player field, to include it as counting towards our wins tally, even if there is just one British player in it.
36 Sliced Backhand 37 Elegant Point 38 JonH, Bob In Spain 39 DF, Danten 40 Sheddie, Coup Droit 41 goldfish, Var 42 Brendan F, Jan 43 Ballavong, Blue Belle 44 Dodrade, Bagel, 9Vicman, Vhughes
runners and riders left in. 19 people left in, still a fair few. Remember,
last year was 40 wins, we could be quite close to that.
Our Wimbledon average over the period weve counted is 35.6 so we are in that area now. So not a bad year so far with a few more to come, hopefully
Hmm, not great though. Considering the relative current level of pur players, and to an extent other recent Slams, I think they should really be on about 47 this year
Though, as has been said, 2 or 3 players have given us significant hits against probably many folks' expectations, which can just happen. So in the end I guess we are indeed probably looking at - not bad.
Our Wimbledon average over the period weve counted is 35.6 so we are in that area now. So not a bad year so far with a few more to come, hopefully
Hmm, not great though. Considering the relative current level of pur players, and to an extent other recent Slams, I think they should really be on about 47 this year
Though, as has been said, 2 or 3 players have given us significant hits against probably many folks' expectations, which can just happen. So in the end I guess we are indeed probably looking at - not bad.
I think with what is left, if we can touch on 40, as it was last year, we would probably say it has been decent enough - 40 wins with a doubles title thrown in!
Our Wimbledon average over the period weve counted is 35.6 so we are in that area now. So not a bad year so far with a few more to come, hopefully
Hmm, not great though. Considering the relative current level of pur players, and to an extent other recent Slams, I think they should really be on about 47 this year
Though, as has been said, 2 or 3 players have given us significant hits against probably many folks' expectations, which can just happen. So in the end I guess we are indeed probably looking at - not bad.
I think with what is left, if we can touch on 40, as it was last year, we would probably say it has been decent enough - 40 wins with a doubles title thrown in!