Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Boys & Girls: J200 Oslo, Norway, indoor hard (Week 48)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17385
Date:
Boys & Girls: J200 Oslo, Norway, indoor hard (Week 48)


She is a good baseline player, well coached not surprisingly, given her parents were both tour players.
Lacked a bit of power and consistency whenever I saw her

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55290
Date:

I've seen her play several times

Like paulis, I think she looks very well coached - very clean technique, and the thing that stands out (for me) is her 'bounciness' - she makes the effort on every ball to do the little jump before the ball comes, even the easiest of balls - lots of players are a little lazy and it shows very good discipline, well ingrained, to do it each and every time

But, not sure about power or consistency, my 'criticism' would be that it's a bit uninspired. She never/very rarely takes the ball very early, or goes down the line when everyone's expecting it crosscourt, or finds an angle that surprises you

And the match she lost by a whsiker against 14 year-old Barros at Roehampton was a real choke - not saying she does it often, I couldn't say, but that one was a match that she really had, every which way, and somehow found a way to lose it

But you can go a long way with very clean technique and good rigour on court 



-- Edited by Coup Droit on Saturday 30th of November 2024 07:09:03 PM

__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1504
Date:

Good to see Brooke win, she seems to have had unfair criticism on here sometimes over alleged excessive WC's and being a "Nepo Baby".

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40795
Date:

dodrade wrote:

Good to see Brooke win, she seems to have had unfair criticism on here sometimes over alleged excessive WC's and being a "Nepo Baby".


 Such an impressive week for Brooke. But re the WCs point I recall an interesting discussion or two. Why does criticism seem to have been unfair?



__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1504
Date:

indiana wrote:
dodrade wrote:

Good to see Brooke win, she seems to have had unfair criticism on here sometimes over alleged excessive WC's and being a "Nepo Baby".


 Such an impressive week for Brooke. But re the WCs point I recall an interesting discussion or two. Why does criticism seem to have been unfair?


 It certainly seemed to be implied that she was getting preferential treatment because of her surname.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6831
Date:

Found this

https://nehandaradio.com/2012/07/08/reviving-the-tennis-legend-of-the-black-family/

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55290
Date:

dodrade wrote:
indiana wrote:
dodrade wrote:

Good to see Brooke win, she seems to have had unfair criticism on here sometimes over alleged excessive WC's and being a "Nepo Baby".


 Such an impressive week for Brooke. But re the WCs point I recall an interesting discussion or two. Why does criticism seem to have been unfair?


 It certainly seemed to be implied that she was getting preferential treatment because of her surname.


 Yes, and Indy's point was 'do we know that was actually unfair criticism'?

I think it was more a point of argument than a personal belief that it was fair - a question really

Nothing to do with Brooke, but the LTA and 'preferential treatment', not founded on talent and potential, are certainly things that might go together in a sentence.....



-- Edited by Coup Droit on Monday 2nd of December 2024 08:58:44 AM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40795
Date:

Correct CD. I merely wondered, and still do, why dodrade was suggesting the WCs criticism was unfair. Did he maybe know more?

I have no position myself other than I don't recall anything that appeared unreasonable in the points of view. I suspect maybe best just move on ...

Separately, my regard for Brooke''s oncourt November achievements have been made clear elsewhere.



-- Edited by indiana on Monday 2nd of December 2024 12:40:02 PM



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41569
Date:

indiana wrote:

Correct CD. I merely wondered, and still do, why dodrade was suggesting the WC criticism was unfair. Did he maybe know more?

I have no position myself other than I don't recall anything that appeared unreasonable in the points of view.

Though my regard for Brooke''s oncourt Movember schievejents have been made clear elsewhere.


 you going all Afrikaans on us?! (which felt like a good joke given her parents Zimbabwean background!!)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40795
Date:

LOL. I'll even let you off with coming back well inside the reasonable time period for correction of typos 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55290
Date:

Good one, Jon

Yes, Indy, I agree, that gets a pass - it made me giggle

(And not really relevant but don't remember Brooke, yes or no, but Marelie Raath most definitely talks very loudly to herself on court, in Afrikaans)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41569
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Good one, Jon

Yes, Indy, I agree, that gets a pass - it made me giggle

(And not really relevant but don't remember Brooke, yes or no, but Marelie Raath most definitely talks very loudly to herself on court, in Afrikaans)


 biggrin



__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard