Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Link Back -> Andrew Murray message board -> British men discussion section -> Week 7 - ATP Challenger 50 - Glasgow, Great Britain (indoor hard)
Post Info TOPIC: Week 7 - ATP Challenger 50 - Glasgow, Great Britain (indoor hard)
wales1994


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 803
Date:
RE: Week 7 - ATP Challenger 50 - Glasgow, Great Britain (indoor hard)
Permalink  

Jaffa wrote:

Funny how things happen isnt it, I have banged on about Sunderland a few times but Hamish played Strombachs the day I was there and the match followed a similar pattern. I wonder if he called himself dopey this time?


I have to say I disagree about a few comments RE Pauls ceiling - I really think he could have a brilliant career if he stays fit

The LTA deserve some credit for putting these on, they rightly got criticism a few years ago about the calendar but the last couple of years theyve nailed it.

I agree, he has had very few full years on tour, and even cracked the top 200 at one point. He has a nice game - I think he could go higher than his CHR. Top 100? Who knows - but I think barring injury he could rise back up beyond previous heights. 



__________________
Come on brits :D
JonH comes home


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41496
Date:
Permalink  

wales1994 wrote:
Jaffa wrote:

Funny how things happen isnt it, I have banged on about Sunderland a few times but Hamish played Strombachs the day I was there and the match followed a similar pattern. I wonder if he called himself dopey this time?


I have to say I disagree about a few comments RE Pauls ceiling - I really think he could have a brilliant career if he stays fit

The LTA deserve some credit for putting these on, they rightly got criticism a few years ago about the calendar but the last couple of years theyve nailed it.

I agree, he has had very few full years on tour, and even cracked the top 200 at one point. He has a nice game - I think he could go higher than his CHR. Top 100? Who knows - but I think barring injury he could rise back up beyond previous heights. 

 I do hope people are right, I would be pleased to get this one wrong as I am a big fan of Paul and his back story makes you want him to succeed. I have always been concerned his game isnt "big enough" to make real headway into the top 100, that has always been my concern. But he has the skill and it never stopped Evo , for example. 



__________________
Stircrazy


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57733
Date:
Permalink  

L16:  Elmar Ejupovic (GER) WR 433 defeated (8) Charles Broom WR 333 by 4 & 3  bleh



__________________
scottie1


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1857
Date:
Permalink  

just watched the second set of Broom match the German guy had a bad fall near scoreboard and match was stopped at 0-1. The German was better player Charles missed several volleys at net. He seemed to have no enthusiasm in the match much like the win against McHugh 2 days ago.

__________________
Stircrazy


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57733
Date:
Permalink  

QF:  (WC) Hamish Stewart WR 504 vs Clément Chidekh (FRA) WR 563 (CH = 331 last May)



__________________
scottie1


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1857
Date:
Permalink  

just watched the second set of Broom match the German guy had a bad fall near scoreboard and match was stopped at 0-1. The German was better player Charles missed several volleys at net. He seemed to have no enthusiasm in the match much like the win against McHugh 2 days ago.

__________________
scottie1


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1857
Date:
Permalink  

Kyle very hit and miss Stuart Parker very steady good serve. Kyle looks slower on baseline.

__________________
JonH comes home


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41496
Date:
Permalink  

So 4 into the last 8 for certain. 3 in bottom half. Interested that Stuart was leading Kyle last I checked, albeit end of first set.

__________________
Stircrazy


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57733
Date:
Permalink  

Stircrazy wrote:

QF:  (WC) Hamish Stewart WR 504 vs Clément Chidekh (FRA) WR 563 (CH = 331 last May)

L16:  (Q) Stuart Parker WR 733 defeated (WC) Kyle Edmund WR 406 by 7-6(4) 7-6(5)  biggrin  bleh

Quite a feather in Stuart's cap!

*****

QF:  Elmar Ejupovic (GER) WR 433 vs (Q) Stuart Parker WR 733



__________________
scottie1


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1857
Date:
Permalink  

two excellent tie breaks from Stuart to win. He was more consistent throughout the match. Kyle too up and down some excellent forehand but plenty misses. Is he 100 per cent fit I am not sure? Keeps flexing his left knee

__________________
Stircrazy


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57733
Date:
Permalink  

Stircrazy wrote:
QF:  (WC) Hamish Stewart WR 504 vs Clément Chidekh (FRA) WR 563 (CH = 331 last May)

          QF:  Elmar Ejupovic (GER) WR 433 vs (Q) Stuart Parker WR 733

L16:  (Q) Paul Jubb WR 502 defeated (Q) Charlie Robertson UNR by 2 & 2

*****

QF:  (WC) Henry Searle WR 874 vs (Q) Paul Jubb WR 502



__________________
Stircrazy


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57733
Date:
Permalink  

QF:  Clément Chidekh (FRA) WR 563 defeated (WC) Hamish Stewart WR 504 by 4-6 6-4 6-4  cry

It would have been good to have Scottie's insights on that match.  It means an all-pesky top half.



__________________
Stircrazy


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57733
Date:
Permalink  

Stircrazy wrote:

QF:  Clément Chidekh (FRA) WR 563 defeated (WC) Hamish Stewart WR 504 by 4-6 6-4 6-4  cry

It would have been good to have Scottie's insights on that match.  It means an all-pesky top half.

QF:  Elmar Ejupovic (GER) WR 433 "defeated" (Q) Stuart Parker WR 733 by a walkover  bleh

I wonder what's up with Stuart.  Hope it's nothing serious.



__________________
SuperT


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1814
Date:
Permalink  

Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

QF:  Clément Chidekh (FRA) WR 563 defeated (WC) Hamish Stewart WR 504 by 4-6 6-4 6-4  cry

It would have been good to have Scottie's insights on that match.  It means an all-pesky top half.

QF:  Elmar Ejupovic (GER) WR 433 "defeated" (Q) Stuart Parker WR 733 by a walkover  bleh

I wonder what's up with Stuart.  Hope it's nothing serious.

 Sorry but I always find it really annoying when someone knocks out one of our players and that pulls out of the next round.  It could have been Kyle playing Ejupovic today. 



__________________
JonH comes home


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41496
Date:
Permalink  

SuperT wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:
Stircrazy wrote:

QF:  Clément Chidekh (FRA) WR 563 defeated (WC) Hamish Stewart WR 504 by 4-6 6-4 6-4  cry

It would have been good to have Scottie's insights on that match.  It means an all-pesky top half.

QF:  Elmar Ejupovic (GER) WR 433 "defeated" (Q) Stuart Parker WR 733 by a walkover  bleh

I wonder what's up with Stuart.  Hope it's nothing serious.

 Sorry but I always find it really annoying when someone knocks out one of our players and that pulls out of the next round.  It could have been Kyle playing Ejupovic today. 

 Presumably Stuart wasnt injured when he completed v Kyle or not badly? But to be honest, every point is important in WR terms and in terms of cash, so hard to blame Stuart in taking the win, even if annoying! It is pro sport and dog eat dog, I reckon.   



__________________
«First  <  1 … 6 7 8 9 10  >  Last»  | Page of 10  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Link Back -> Andrew Murray message board -> British men discussion section -> Week 7 - ATP Challenger 50 - Glasgow, Great Britain (indoor hard)
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard