Bob in Spain wrote:

---

Surely that table is upside down.

---

 Well, I think so 

Doonan wrote:

---

Ill swap Harris for Murray please. Bit of a no brainer

Draper - 24
Norrie - 45
Evans - 71
Murray - 82
Choinski - 123
Fery - 138
Loffhagen - 165
Broady - 176
Jubb - 217
Gill - 234

Res: Harris 156

---

 

Andy was my sub so not going to change anything.

JonH comes home wrote:

---

Coup Droit wrote:

---

Bob in Spain wrote:

---

Surely that table is upside down.

---

 Well, I think so 

---

 in both tables, you are making me look good CD! And only you! Thanks!  

---

 You're welcome - anything to oblige ! 

But I'm waiting till the addict puts up the link to the actual spreadsheet (which he usually does) - then I'll launch my full-throttle appeal, on some small technical glitch (like he's missed 30 points which should be there because.....because.... well, I haven't quite finessed the details on that yet)

And THEN you'll see 

the addict wrote:

---

Actually the link to the spreadsheet stopped working a long time ago, so I'll let you work the points out for yourself

---

 Work it out for myself? 

 

the addict wrote:

---

Coup Droit wrote:

---

the addict wrote:

---

Actually the link to the spreadsheet stopped working a long time ago, so I'll let you work the points out for yourself

---

 Work it out for myself? 

 

---

 I had a quick look at your entties - and as last year you are playing the long-game

Hardly any points for the world rankings ..........

---

 

Thanks, the addict - I wasn't being serious 

And I do seem to remember that it all took a turn for the better last year, towards the end (although, from recollection, I don't think it could have gotten any worse .... )

But OK, girls and boys, time to get those world rankings in order - make an effort now please ....

And I'll go off and consider my swaps .....

Bob in Spain wrote:

---

the addict wrote:

---

Coup Droit wrote:

---

the addict wrote:

---

Actually the link to the spreadsheet stopped working a long time ago, so I'll let you work the points out for yourself

---

 Work it out for myself? 

 

---

 I had a quick look at your entties - and as last year you are playing the long-game

Hardly any points for the world rankings ..........

---

How long ?   5 years ?

---

 oi, cheeky 

You are dissing the 2016 and 2022 Women's Prediction Winner, I'll have you know 

I demand a bit of respect 

(although I'm utterly crud at the men's side, I note - never even got a measly third place - and I'm not holding my breath for the women's either this year )