Harry, in my view it's not a question of whether it helps the players or not
It's for the spectators
They like to see GB players; they don't really care about the 8th best Czech youngster, even if she is higher ranked that all the GB ones put together
The people in the stands, the TV viewers, everyone enjoys it
The vast bulk of the players are there on merit. The wildcards are just to add a little extra local interest.
And, as Indy says, France gives out tons of wildcards to players who don't 'deserve' it; so does the US and Australia.
Why should we take a stand and stop?
So I'd keep them
The problem with tennis in the UK is not because we give out wildcards (otherwise the other federations would have the same problem)
CD what you say is obviously correct and I'm just stating my opinion.
However, I do think giving out wildcards to our players when they frankly don't deserve them just because the public might like to see them play isn't the right thing to do.
Just because other countries do it doesn't make it right. I do feel our women can basically play through the year knowing they are going to get a few wildcards in June to help their ranking and earnings and whilst I understand why this is done I don't think it is the way to breed the competitive edge and desire required to be a really top player.
In the case of some of our likely women they are not young players in terms of professional sport. Boulter and Dart are approaching 27, Watson is 31, Miyazaki is 27. I'm not sure how giving such players wildcards help either their personal game or the national game though I'm sure they will mostly get one and obviously I hope they make the most of them as I would if I were French, Australian etc etc in their grand slams.
Players of smaller nations have to fight their way up the rankings without a whole raft of free entries. Tauson is a good example of such a player. Of course as you say wildcards are not the reason we are struggling but I don't think they help.
Anyway, understandably Wimbledon are not going to change so it will be interesting to see to whom the wildcards are granted, though it will likely be the predictable usual candidates for the main draw, qualifying could be much more interesting.
Are you really saying that you don't think our young women try hard enough because they think they'll just get a Wimbly wild card? I actually think that's really unfair on them if so. I've said this before and I'll change my mind if I hear actual evidence against it but I feel that the main issue overall is managing to keep injury free for a lot of our women. Jodie, Katie S, Katie B, Katy Dunne, Fran, Emma and in the recent past Laura Robson and Jo Konta have all had a succession of injury/health issues that have hampered them from really reaching their absolute potential. If you can't play a full season, it's harder to build momentum. This has happened regularly for Jodie and the Katies. Jodie would more than likely have reached the top 100 if she hadn't missed those couple of months when she wasn't defending points from last year.
My question is about whether they are more prone to injury than women from other countries or if that's just my perception because I'm British and notice it more. And if it is true, then why does it keep happening?
And Heather and Harriet are both triers, I don't think either of them can be accused of not doing their best. I'm happy to see them getting WCs and I am sure other countries use other ways to prioritise their players. There will always be unfairnesses but it seems silly to artificially disadvantage your own players. I understand your view but just can't agree with it.
To be fair, Nix, this is what Dan Evans basically said
He absolutely did and I thought that was really unfair too.
Not trying to start an argument, just wanted to offer another perspective. I don't think the facts on the basis of what I know, (and I'm happy to be wrong if there's evidence to the contrary) support his claims. If it's not true, then it might be obscuring a more pressing issue, which is why they are all getting injured.
And I love Paul's 'rant' - you can tell it comes from the heart
I've got a slighlty open mind
If not deliberate, maybe the players are subconsciously affected by having the comfort of wildcards? Indeed, if they all come from well-heeled backgrounds - as Paul suggests - maybe that's the issue and not the wildcards.
i.e. it doesn't mean they're not grafting as much as they can. But maybe their personal limits of 'as much as they can' is lower than some others?
Again, I'm not saying I agree or think this - just that all aspects are worth considering....
Also, just to note, Dan Evans is one of the few GB players who doesn't come from a well-off upper middle class sort of family - is that pertinent?
Although Dan came from a suburb of Birmingham (and has a strong Brummie accent,) the area where I went to school, he joined the much more well-heeled neighbouring tennis club in Solihull.
And I love Paul's 'rant' - you can tell it comes from the heart
I've got a slighlty open mind
If not deliberate, maybe the players are subconsciously affected by having the comfort of wildcards? Indeed, if they all come from well-heeled backgrounds - as Paul suggests - maybe that's the issue and not the wildcards.
i.e. it doesn't mean they're not grafting as much as they can. But maybe their personal limits of 'as much as they can' is lower than some others?
Again, I'm not saying I agree or think this - just that all aspects are worth considering....
Also, just to note, Dan Evans is one of the few GB players who doesn't come from a well-off upper middle class sort of family - is that pertinent?
I agree this is a really interesting discussion driven I would say by some frustration that currently due to injury or some other mishap our British women arent performing. Surely the question is why? Katie B was doing well last year and Harriet and it all seems to have fallen apart. Fran Jones in my honest opinion is beyond criticism as I think it is amazing how she manages to play at all and is a credit to the game. But why are they so prone to injury? Surely there must be a reason - is it how we develop our players through juniors? I cant think it us just the silver spoon scenario tbh - I think it maybe more complex than that.
And I love Paul's 'rant' - you can tell it comes from the heart
I've got a slighlty open mind
If not deliberate, maybe the players are subconsciously affected by having the comfort of wildcards? Indeed, if they all come from well-heeled backgrounds - as Paul suggests - maybe that's the issue and not the wildcards.
i.e. it doesn't mean they're not grafting as much as they can. But maybe their personal limits of 'as much as they can' is lower than some others?
Again, I'm not saying I agree or think this - just that all aspects are worth considering....
Also, just to note, Dan Evans is one of the few GB players who doesn't come from a well-off upper middle class sort of family - is that pertinent?
I agree this is a really interesting discussion driven I would say by some frustration that currently due to injury or some other mishap our British women arent performing. Surely the question is why? Katie B was doing well last year and Harriet and it all seems to have fallen apart. Fran Jones in my honest opinion is beyond criticism as I think it is amazing how she manages to play at all and is a credit to the game. But why are they so prone to injury? Surely there must be a reason - is it how we develop our players through juniors? I cant think it us just the silver spoon scenario tbh - I think it maybe more complex than that.
And whether it is relevant here, I dont know, but Jack D is more regularly injured than many of them, Emma included, Paul Jubb is another, Ali Gray maybe as well. Its maybe not as prevalent in the men but its there. Liam recently as well has gone through it.
Surbiton doubles acceptance list is published on the ITF website and has a few hints at pairings for Wimbledon doubles. Room for some GB wikdcards there as well.
We know winners of the challenger grass events like Ilkley will get wild cards
If they arent already ranked high enough to get in; what happens if a complete outsider wins an event like the Italian 125 or s-hertogenbosch? Will they get a wild card?
Surbiton doubles acceptance list is published on the ITF website and has a few hints at pairings for Wimbledon doubles. Room for some GB wikdcards there as well.
Interesting that several - Eden, Katie S & EWS - have gone with 'new' non-Brit partners, which puts them way down the wildcard priority list (I'm sure EWS has played with Kempen before but possibly not enough to meet the requirement). However, I'm sure we'll see some flexibility if there are good results.
Yes. While it's often stated there are WCs reserved for the winners of the Trophy events, that's only because winners of the other events are expected to be already in the main draw. AELTC will give a WC to the winner of any of the lead in grass events that isn't already in the MD - for example when Samsonova won Berlin in 2021. I believe AELTC partially fund, licence or are the rights holder of many of the European grass events so they wouldn't look at them any differently to the GB events.
Surbiton doubles acceptance list is published on the ITF website and has a few hints at pairings for Wimbledon doubles. Room for some GB wikdcards there as well.
Interesting that several - Eden, Katie S & EWS - have gone with 'new' non-Brit partners, which puts them way down the wildcard priority list (I'm sure EWS has played with Kempen before but possibly not enough to meet the requirement). However, I'm sure we'll see some flexibility if there are good results.
There is also the possibility of some junior pairs being in the running, and I see that Holly Hutchinson and Madeleine Brooks are climbing the rankings as an established pair this year (both with big jumps in CH's on Coric live rankings)
Yes. While it's often stated there are WCs reserved for the winners of the Trophy events, that's only because winners of the other events are expected to be already in the main draw. AELTC will give a WC to the winner of any of the lead in grass events that isn't already in the MD - for example when Samsonova won Berlin in 2021. I believe AELTC partially fund, licence or are the rights holder of many of the European grass events so they wouldn't look at them any differently to the GB events.
Thanks Lambda - that makes sense and , tbh, I am pleased to see that all could treated in this way. As you say, probably unusual as most event winners will already be ranked high enough, but worthy of note as it will detract from available wild cards - the little Italian W125 event in Gaiba would seem the most likely to me to throw up a lower ranked winner?
Venus has a WC to 's-Hertogenbosch so I think it's likely she has a Wimbly WC.
If Venus and Svitolina have a WC and WCs are needed for Surbiton and Ilkley winners then either Hev or Katie S could miss out as there would only be room for 4 Brits.
And she has a WC for Birmingham. The LTA say 2 major wild card additions have been confirmed for Birmingham but only name Venus.
Emily App must think she and Lohoff have a shot at getting a wildcard for her to have not started up an all-GB pairing (would guess it would have needed to be Eden or EWS)? Or they are just trying to keep the partnership rolling as long as they can but she'll enter Wimbledon with a Brit.
But Freya/Ali, Naiktha/Maia and Heather/Harriet all seem nailed on.
Jodie will be able to choose a partner (most likely Katie B? But she could go with Eden) I think if she's defacto GB #1.
Venus has a WC to 's-Hertogenbosch so I think it's likely she has a Wimbly WC.
If Venus and Svitolina have a WC and WCs are needed for Surbiton and Ilkley winners then either Hev or Katie S could miss out as there would only be room for 4 Brits.
Any chance of eeing Mirra Andreeva before Wimbeldon - would love to see her at Eastbourne.
And she has a WC for Birmingham. The LTA say 2 major wild card additions have been confirmed for Birmingham but only name Venus.
Emily App must think she and Lohoff have a shot at getting a wildcard for her to have not started up an all-GB pairing (would guess it would have needed to be Eden or EWS)? Or they are just trying to keep the partnership rolling as long as they can but she'll enter Wimbledon with a Brit.
But Freya/Ali, Naiktha/Maia and Heather/Harriet all seem nailed on.
Jodie will be able to choose a partner (most likely Katie B? But she could go with Eden) I think if she's defacto GB #1.
I agree with these choices, and hopefully Lissey and Liv will get in directly and not need a wildcad (their ranking has slipped back a little over the clay season).
I think Jodie and Katie S might be a pairing that would do well. Then there is Eden and Beth (if Beth plays), Lily and Lauren and Emily W-S with Magali Kempen. Next in line I would put Holly and Madeleine who are roaring up the rankings. And then there are the juniors - who may get one or two of the wildcards.
Not all of the above will be successful, but perhaps performances at Surbiton next weel will give an indication.