Looking ahead I wonder if the players will pick and choose some of the Masters events going forwards - the top players I mean.
Miami follows IW at 3 days gap. Monte Carlo is 7 days after Miami Madrid is 10 days after MC Rome is 3 days later. Roland Garros is just a week after that
Canada and Cinci are back to back, one starts as the other completes The US Open starts 7 days after Cinci finishes
Some of these will prove punishing for players doing well, hard to see how players will be able to perform week in week out. Look out for lots of upsets
Nothing new here Most of the top players will play them all, except perhaps Monte Carlo, as I am pretty sure 'the big 4' did year after year, while doing very well, during the first half of their careers. It is only in latter years there is likely to be picking and choosing amongst these events
Other than Monte Carlo they are of course also mandatories unless some exemptions have been gained which also come with age and time on tour.
Looking ahead I wonder if the players will pick and choose some of the Masters events going forwards - the top players I mean.
Miami follows IW at 3 days gap. Monte Carlo is 7 days after Miami Madrid is 10 days after MC Rome is 3 days later. Roland Garros is just a week after that
Canada and Cinci are back to back, one starts as the other completes The US Open starts 7 days after Cinci finishes
Some of these will prove punishing for players doing well, hard to see how players will be able to perform week in week out. Look out for lots of upsets
Nothing new here Most of the top players will play them all, except perhaps Monte Carlo, as I am pretty sure 'the big 4' did year after year, while doing very well, during the first half of their careers. It is only in latter years there is likely to be picking and choosing amongst these events
Other than Monte Carlo they are of course also mandatories unless some exemptions have been gained which also come with age and time on tour.
The difference is Madrid and Rome are now two week (or 10 days) events and thus crush the clay court season. Theres no space to breathe. Id say that is new.
Looking ahead I wonder if the players will pick and choose some of the Masters events going forwards - the top players I mean.
Miami follows IW at 3 days gap. Monte Carlo is 7 days after Miami Madrid is 10 days after MC Rome is 3 days later. Roland Garros is just a week after that
Canada and Cinci are back to back, one starts as the other completes The US Open starts 7 days after Cinci finishes
Some of these will prove punishing for players doing well, hard to see how players will be able to perform week in week out. Look out for lots of upsets
Nothing new here Most of the top players will play them all, except perhaps Monte Carlo, as I am pretty sure 'the big 4' did year after year, while doing very well, during the first half of their careers. It is only in latter years there is likely to be picking and choosing amongst these events
Other than Monte Carlo they are of course also mandatories unless some exemptions have been gained which also come with age and time on tour.
The difference is Madrid and Rome are now two week (or 10 days) events and thus crush the clay court season. Theres no space to breathe. Id say that is new.
Yes, I must admit I hadn't fully taken in the schedule and had forgotten about the changes this year.
However,these changes really give more room to breathe through Madrid, Rome and Roland Garros These traditionally had a later start after a bigger break between Monte Carlo and Madrid. But then successive hectic one week events in Madrid and Rome, one week off, then onto Roland Garros ( i.e. similar to Canada, Cincy, US Open ).
Looking ahead I wonder if the players will pick and choose some of the Masters events going forwards - the top players I mean.
Miami follows IW at 3 days gap. Monte Carlo is 7 days after Miami Madrid is 10 days after MC Rome is 3 days later. Roland Garros is just a week after that
Canada and Cinci are back to back, one starts as the other completes The US Open starts 7 days after Cinci finishes
Some of these will prove punishing for players doing well, hard to see how players will be able to perform week in week out. Look out for lots of upsets
Nothing new here Most of the top players will play them all, except perhaps Monte Carlo, as I am pretty sure 'the big 4' did year after year, while doing very well, during the first half of their careers. It is only in latter years there is likely to be picking and choosing amongst these events
Other than Monte Carlo they are of course also mandatories unless some exemptions have been gained which also come with age and time on tour.
The difference is Madrid and Rome are now two week (or 10 days) events and thus crush the clay court season. Theres no space to breathe. Id say that is new.
Yes, I must admit I hadn't fully taken in the schedule and had forgotten about the changes this year.
However,these changes really give more room to breathe through Madrid, Rome and Roland Garros These traditionally had a later start after a bigger break between Monte Carlo and Madrid. But then successive hectic one week events in Madrid and Rome, one week off, then onto Roland Garros ( i.e. similar to Canada, Cincy, US Open ).
Well I guess whether better or worse , it is still hectic for mens and womens (which have Doha/Dubai just before IW). Throw in olympic years and it has dawned on me more than other years how crammed it is. Cant be good for the players whatever the money.
Taro Daniel is playing a very tight, efficient game, beguiling the huge ranking gulf between the two players. Cam is going to have to work to win this first set off him. 4-3 Cam.
Taro Daniel is playing a very tight, efficient game, beguiling the huge ranking gulf between the two players. Cam is going to have to work to win this first set off him. 4-3 Cam.
To be fair, even though he's a qualifier, he managed to beat Roberto Carballés (WR 79) & Matteo Berrettini (20/WR 23) on his way to the last 32...
-- Edited by Stircrazy on Sunday 12th of March 2023 07:19:08 PM
Taro Daniel is playing a very tight, efficient game, beguiling the huge ranking gulf between the two players. Cam is going to have to work to win this first set off him. 4-3 Cam.
To be fair, even though he's a qualifier, he managed to beat Roberto Carballés (WR 79) & Matteo Berrettini (20/WR 23) on his way to the last 16...
You gotta fancy Cam to nick the tie break though...
Taro Daniel is playing a very tight, efficient game, beguiling the huge ranking gulf between the two players. Cam is going to have to work to win this first set off him. 4-3 Cam.
To be fair, even though he's a qualifier, he managed to beat Roberto Carballés (WR 79) & Matteo Berrettini (20/WR 23) on his way to the last 16...
Taro Daniel is playing a very tight, efficient game, beguiling the huge ranking gulf between the two players. Cam is going to have to work to win this first set off him. 4-3 Cam.
To be fair, even though he's a qualifier, he managed to beat Roberto Carballés (WR 79) & Matteo Berrettini (20/WR 23) on his way to the last 16...
You gotta fancy Cam to nick the tie break though...
Perhaps not: 6-7(5).
Off topic, did you mean "belying", not "beguiling", in your original post?
Taro Daniel just keeps coming, Cam can't shake him off and the Japanese deservedly takes the tie break 7-5. Cam's got to hope Daniel's level drops at some point.