Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 34 US Open Qualifying


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 708
Date:
Week 34 US Open Qualifying


Another short match for Harriet in just 2.5hrs in straight sets. She plays so many long matches and hasn't been injured in as long as I remember?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18097
Date:

Q2: BURRAGE, Jodie (GBR) 235 lost to VOEGELE, Stephanie (SUI) 18 128 6-3 4-6 6-7(4)
Q2: RADUCANU, Emma (GBR) 31 150 def BOLKVADZE, Mariam (GEO) 167 6-3 7-5
Q2: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 180 def DIATCHENKO, Vitalia (RUS) 24 139 6-2 5-7 6-4
Q2: DART, Harriet (GBR) 32 151 def STEFANINI, Lucrezia (ITA) 213 7-6(1) 7-6(5)
Q2: MURRAY SHARAN, (GBR) PR 263 lost to NICULESCU, Monica (ROM) 216 4-6 6-3 3-6
Q2: JONES, Francesca (GBR) 170 lost to CRISTIAN, Jaqueline Adina (ROM) 26 142 4-6 4-6

Q3: RADUCANU, Emma (GBR) 31 150 =CH {18yo JCH= 20} v SHERIF, Mayar (EGY) 4 95 (CH=94 2021)
Q3: BOULTER, Katie (GBR) 180 (CH=82 2019) v KUCOVA, Kristina (SLV) 8
Q3: DART, Harriet (GBR) 32 151 (CH=121 2019) v TOMOVA, Viktoriya (BUL) 12 117 (CH=104 2021)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42027
Date:

Thats one above seedings. Incl mens , its spot on with 3 making it through.

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 806
Date:

When was the last time we had 3 women in the FQR of a slam? I feel like it happened recently....

__________________
Come on brits :D


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1505
Date:

Relieved Katie made it through, a shame about Jodie and Fran.

__________________


Specialist Reporter + Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 2427
Date:

Sam - played better than I expected, a few poor volleys cost her in the 3rd set. Lots of super tennis from her. A good effort.

Emma - Struggled in the heat. Started the match dominating the play then went passive for a lengthy spell, relying on errors from Mariam for the break to make it *5-3. Combination of serve out wide followed by either a forehand into the vacant space or a back behind Mariam, worked well throughout the match. Recovered well after being broken for 2-4* in the 2nd set, aggressive tennis winning her all four points as she broke to love. Mariam gifted her the break for *6-5 with two forehand errors and then two dfs.

Fran - Jaqueline had too much quality. Fran played a few good points.

Jodie - So close. Great first set. Could have done with serving better at the start of the 2nd set. Was playing well in the third but never threatened a two break lead. A poor forehand error into the net at 0-30 6-5* was costly, although she did force one mp in that game.

Harriet - Got the win. A horrible match to watch. 43% first serve percentage.

Katie - Brutal ball striking from both players. Some incredible shots from Vitalia, especially during her 2nd set comeback.

__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3384
Date:

Jiwan wrote:
jb288 wrote:

Amazing that for all our talk about Harriet's second serve ..she still wins a higher percentage on it than her first :)


 I've heard somewhere that she really goes for her second serve. Otherwise her second serve is rolled in


 If you go to page 4 of the Chicago 125k thread we have a brief discussion of why that might be.

https://britishtennis.activeboard.com/t67819116/week-33-wta125-chicago-usa-hard/?page=4&sort=oldestFirst



__________________


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3384
Date:

Went to bed with Jodie 4-1 up in the 3rd set, Katie cruising and wake up to drama. The 3 that I 'expected' to get through, did. Shame for Jodie but 3 of our Women have 20 points more than I expected so a reasonably successful trip.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55410
Date:

Yes. A great set of results. Fran played fine but was beaten faire and square. Sam played better than expected - I think her husband has had an influence - she comes in a lot more, often very effectively - wouldn't be surprised if that's him
Emma was always winning, imo, even if not in style always. Harriet too was the better player overall. Didn't see Katie's third set but she should have won in two.
Only jodies is the heart breaker. And tbh no one expected her in that round, or to be that close.

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:

It is the first time that Emma has been in qualifying in a Grand Slam other than Wimbledon. So a win today would be  her 1st Grand Slam qualification. However Katie has been playing considerably longer and has  never qualified in any Grand Slam. By way of contrast Harriet has qualified for both Australia and US Opens in fhe past.



__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:
wales1994 wrote:

Great match point, but unfortunately goes the other way. Did Jodie choke this win away or did her opponent play well to get it back?


 Yes, agree with PaulM

This was not a choke (I'd say Katie's second set end was more of a choke - and LOVE the Jeremey Bates quip - I'm rather afraid Katie's mum is too matey and rather in awe of Jeremy - it would Katie good to have a change, even if you're a Jeremy fan - are there any?)

But back to Jodie.... 

Yes, you can say that from that lead in the third she 'should' have done better. But it was only one break. 

She didn't lose her cool. She played her game - went for shots, without being crazy. 

The only thing that I feel cost her was that she made way too many mistakes off the serve, particularly the second serve. You can't just keep missing so many second serve returns. She needed to 'enfonce le clou' as the French say i.e. hit her when she's down, drive it home, not give her wriggle room. 

And, yes, Stef was quite wily and played her percentages. Mind you, she looked very relieved - and a little surprised - to have won. 

But Jodie really played some excellent tennis. 


 I preferred Jeremy Bates as a player than a coach. Has he actually achieved anything as a coach? 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55410
Date:

I honestly believe he far prefers being a player than a coach.

Which isn't a criticism. Just don't be a coach.

About 5 years ago, I was next to him (happy days!) for a couple of hours, watching Katie Boutler - I've never seen such a dour, miserable, face and demeanour - and everything he said (to her, to her mum, to anyone) was like a load of wet fish. She lost.

THEN it started to rain and we were all in the clubhouse - and a couple of older top players were around and they were chatting (they might all have been still playing the veteran circuit) - and, my god, he was animated, he was happy, talking about matches, and joking with mates, etc. etc.

The man's a good veteran (now) tennis player, not a coach of youngsters.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23351
Date:

I've seen him at two or three tournaments watching Emily Appleton, and, yes, miserable old sod, never a smile.

__________________
Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7945
Date:

Phew! Well done Katie and Harriet! Fabulous news.
So close for Jodie...

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 450
Date:

Hope Jodie is not too disappointed - because her performances have shown real progress. Hope she can push forward now into the top 200 and beyond.

__________________
«First  <  118 19 20 21 2231  >  Last»  | Page of 31  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard