sadly Joe lost, so we're still on 11. Maximum possible now (dare I say it??) 13.
Didn't you get .Melbourne correct on 13 miriambee?!
I think i did win a poll earlier this year. But I shan't win this one as I said 16, and they're not going to count mixed or each individual doubles player, if they were I would be very close. i do hope "they" whoever they are? in the next polls count each player for doubles, as this is British tennis, each individual player is important so 2 british doubles players playing together should count as 2 wins, not 1.
sadly Joe lost, so we're still on 11. Maximum possible now (dare I say it??) 13.
Didn't you get .Melbourne correct on 13 miriambee?!
I think i did win a poll earlier this year. But I shan't win this one as I said 16, and they're not going to count mixed or each individual doubles player, if they were I would be very close. i do hope "they" whoever they are? in the next polls count each player for doubles, as this is British tennis, each individual player is important so 2 british doubles players playing together should count as 2 wins, not 1.
They is me miriambee. .
I take the point and will dwell before Wimbledon on both points.
So we end with 11 wins at RG this year, which fell neatly between all our predictions and nobody got it right.
Jo is undoubtedly our player with the most wins, as Jamie was in Melbourne. Hopefully we will many more wins at Wimbledon.
Acceding to well intended pressure, I WILL count mixed there! I dont feel I will change the other parameters eg how I count doubles wins however, but mixed will be on the table now !
For what it is worth Melbourne gave us 5 mixed wins and thus if it had been counted then we would have had 18 wins in total.
In Paris we had 2 mixed wins, taking us to 13 wins in total.
-- Edited by JonH on Friday 7th of June 2019 06:16:53 PM