Yeah - people who support James. Part of being a fan is taking the rough (various horrid losses over the years) with the smooth (e.g. Queens semi, breaking the top 100).
Yeah - people who support James. Part of being a fan is taking the rough (various horrid losses over the years) with the smooth (e.g. Queens semi, breaking the top 100).
The contrast between the men and women is noticeable in that the older players in the mens are moving up the rankings on their comebacks in the shape of James and Dan, whereas in the women its the younger players. Still waiting for some of the younger males to push on, think we will have to hope on Aidan and George.
Yes it is very much the old guard enjoying success so far. Though I have to say Im delighted to have James and Dan to follow again. Theyve both - especially Dan - always been the players Ive most enjoyed watching on the tour :)
Just watching some of dan playing (whilst working) and they are 4-4 first set. Dan's game is so elegant to watch, opponent looks cumbersome and slow but I think it is that Dan's shots are never obvious and v precise. Although it is close, it is clear who the better player is, although that doesnt always determine the winner as we know.
I know where you are coming from but to me the better player, at least on the day, generally is the winner even if that is say a serve bot. Different ways ...
If they are good enough to get to the position of their last point being the winning point then they've done the business.