And, yes, I know it's just one. So I'll tick Hev when it comes to it. But that's my top three, whatever....
Ps very close between Dan and Hev.....Dan's beaten far better people, and I loved his matches. But a title is a title....
And, yes, I know it's just one. So I'll tick Hev when it comes to it. But that's my top three, whatever.... Ps very close between Dan and Hev.....Dan's beaten far better people, and I loved his matches. But a title is a title....
Hey let's not influence the voters just yet , the polling police are watching closely !
And, yes, I know it's just one. So I'll tick Hev when it comes to it. But that's my top three, whatever.... Ps very close between Dan and Hev.....Dan's beaten far better people, and I loved his matches. But a title is a title....
Hey let's not influence the voters just yet , the polling police are watching closely !
I can't believe my opinion has any influence!!!
And, anyway, it's good to put it out there. Open discussion encouraged !
Welcome Christine and Billy will be added to the list.
As Christine points out, and mentioned somewhere up the thread, anyone can nominate a player for whatever reason they feel is worthy. Winning an event doesn't automatically get them on the list, we may have many winners and only some may get nominated for whatever reason. Similarly, not winning an event doesnt preclude anyone. It may well be , a "body of work" over the month (Dan is an example) or some really credit worthy individual wins (again, Dan comes to mind) which get them on the list.
I am just adding Billy and his record and later this evening will post the poll and the summary of their performances!