Just to make clear to all foreigners logging on here - we are more concerned about Andy's hip for his own sake and the sake of British tennis than we are for our own ranking predictions !
(Although I do think that not entering at all because of it is a bit wimpy - after all, Kyle could trip over a daisy tomorrow and be out for 6 months, Mandy C had a horrible year with injury, we've all had to factor in Alex Ward's chances of his injury recurring, or whether Freya is truly better, or not, etc. etc. - it's just part and parcel of the unpredictability of professional tennis - in some ways Andy's is easier this year because at least it was out in the open, rather than coming on suddenly mid-year).
It occurs to me I have probably miscalculated regarding predicting Andys retirement from the game and his end of year ranking in 2018 as his ranking would not immediately disappear and he be considered inactive until all his ranking points have fallen off. The exception would be if he requested removal in which case he would be immediately considered inactive.
Yes, but he's actually going to have to compete and win matches to have ranking points. As of now, all his current ranking points will be gone by the end of Wimbledon.
Unfortunately ( for Andy !! ) leaving him out all together may prove better than any prediction of him in the top 10.
Interesting that Indiana apart no one trusts Kyle to get higher than around the 30s yet when you compare him to Jack Sock, who I watch a lot, he has a stronger all round game and Sock is a solid 15 (currently 8 after a surprise Paris result where Kyle had him on the ropes).Clearly we think he needs another season to toughen up mentally.
Interesting that Indiana apart no one trusts Kyle to get higher than around the 30s yet when you compare him to Jack Sock, who I watch a lot, he has a stronger all round game and Sock is a solid 15 (currently 8 after a surprise Paris result where Kyle had him on the ropes).Clearly we think he needs another season to toughen up mentally.
I've got Kyle at 42. Hopefully I and others have underestimated. I think the slight backward step in the rankings over last year has probably influenced folk although he undoubtably played very well at times and some have pointed to some improving areas of his game. We apparently average 35 ( ranging from 23 to 52 ) as against his current WR 50 and CH 40.
Certainly he's started the year with two very good looking wins. Very early days but good early signs.
Interesting that Indiana apart no one trusts Kyle to get higher than around the 30s yet when you compare him to Jack Sock, who I watch a lot, he has a stronger all round game and Sock is a solid 15 (currently 8 after a surprise Paris result where Kyle had him on the ropes).Clearly we think he needs another season to toughen up mentally.
Have you got the right year, Toby?
Merv and the Knight have Kyle at 23. JonH and ChrisT have him at 25. The emptyvessel at 27. Paulisi's gone for 28. They're not in the teens but they're pretty optimistic.
Update on the male predictions. FriendofLouieG and Stringbow both pick up a point for Dan Evans as he moves into 12th place in the GB rankings (they predicted GB no. 8), and his ranking should now start to influence the table. Also some points for James Ward now starting to appear.
I have re-inserted Status Quo after accidentally leaving them out of the last update. Only the 3 sharing equal first manage to to better then just going with the rankings as of 1st January, so perhaps next year no need to think too hard.