Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 26 - ITF ($100K + H) - Southsea, Great Britain Grass


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 315
Date:
Week 26 - ITF ($100K + H) - Southsea, Great Britain Grass


Draw is out:

R16: (WC) Katie Boulter WR 246 vs Andrea Petkovic (GER) WR 86 (CH=9 10/2011)

R16: (4) Ekaterina Alexandrova (RUS) WR 76 (=CH) vs (WC) Laura Robson WR 188

And the Doubles:

QF: Shuko AOYAMA (JPN) [1] Zhaoxuan YANG (CHN) [1] vs Aleksandra PITAK (GBR) (WC) Katarzyna PITAK (GBR) (WC)
QF: Jocelyn RAE (GBR) Laura ROBSON (GBR) vs Makoto NINOMIYA (JPN) Renata VORACOVA (CZE)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 20302
Date:

Ouch !

I pity the Pitak's, Jos and Maria at Ilkley, and now the top seeds.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

I really don't like this event.
How are the points working.
The idea of the ITF is consistent 32 draws throughout.
On the WTA they can have more, with separate points structures, but not fewer.
What are R1 winners receiving?
Is the winner getting the same points as someone winning another $100K+H, even though they have played a round less?
I appreciate the demand they're trying to fill in this particular week, but this invitational, with special rules is a dangerous and unnecessary precedent upon what was a realtively stable infrastructure for draws and points.

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 479
Date:

Is there ever a British event for which KB and LR don't get a wildcard? The most favoured of the favoured! I wonder why?

Also are points awarded for 1st round losers-singles and doubles?



-- Edited by telstar on Monday 26th of June 2017 05:34:12 PM



-- Edited by telstar on Monday 26th of June 2017 05:44:31 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17851
Date:

Points for each round of a ITF $100K+H 16 entries in main draw:- 1, 28, 55, 90, 150

The table doesn't specify the points for a $100K+H doubles but I assume it will be:- 1, 55, 90, 150

__________________


ATP level

Status: Offline
Posts: 3126
Date:

Laura Robson to serve first

0-15

15-15

30-15

40-15

40-30

40-40

adv Alexandrova

1-0

 

0-15

15-15

30-15

30-30

40-30

40-40

adv Alexandrova

2-0

 

0-15

0-30

15-30

30-30

30-40

40-40

adv Robson

2-1



__________________


ATP level

Status: Offline
Posts: 3126
Date:

0-15

0-30

15-30

30-30

30-40

40-40

adv Robson

2-2

 

15-0

30-0

40-0

3-2 Robson



__________________


ATP level

Status: Offline
Posts: 3126
Date:

15-0

30-0

40-0

3-3

 

0-15

0-30

0-40

15-40

30-40

4-3 Alexandrova



__________________


ATP level

Status: Offline
Posts: 3126
Date:

0-15

15-15

30-15

40-15

5-3

 

15-0

30-0

30-15

40-15

5-4

 



__________________


ATP level

Status: Offline
Posts: 3126
Date:

0-15

15-15

30-15

40-15

6-4

 

Alexandrova wins first set

6-4



__________________


ATP level

Status: Offline
Posts: 3126
Date:

2nd set

Robson to serve first

play supended 

.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6852
Date:

rain delay? No attempts to cover court though .

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

Laura consistently being able to be competitive against solid top 100 players, but not quite good enough, going back to lower grade itf's after Wimby should be ideal, and I suspect by the time of the US open, she maybe able to win some of these types of matches.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6852
Date:

philwrig wrote:

Laura consistently being able to be competitive against solid top 100 players, but not quite good enough, going back to lower grade itf's after Wimby should be ideal, and I suspect by the time of the US open, she maybe able to win some of these types of matches.


 She hasn't lost this one yet.  Or has she ?  I agree with the general sentiment though, it does appear that way and you have seen her play live so definitely have a better picture.

 



__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

Absolutely not lost yet, and fingers crossed she can win the final 2 sets, but there does seem a general trend developing, but one with an upward curve which is encouraging.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard