Harriet has done very well to get to where she is, I haven't seen her play for 6 months but at that point she was very consistent no major weapons but making very few errors.

The question is how do you push on through to the top 200 and is that possible for her? I think the discussion should be much more about potential for development and where does she look to do that, why have the results the last 6 months not matched up to the first? Is the difference on the court or in the head? What can she improve to make that next step, is there anyone at the next level with a similar game or will she have to do something different tactically or is that what she has been trying?

You look at Freya's game and you can see that consistency but playing the way she can play would take her into the top 200, Harriet probably has to look elsewhere to make that step. I believe she was pretty close to going to Texas Tech and they would have been delighted to have (I am sure she would have been very successful at that level) her but already she is probably much more advanced from a professional tennis perspective than she would be if she'd gone.