I think as much as anything, it is the fact that the players on the tour are having longer careers now, even on the women's side, making the path to success longer and harder. The structure of points and spread of tournaments on the women's side also make the jump from 25K to 60K very hard. I think a lot of the top girls going to college are hoping to avoid several years in the lower levels and be able to get through them really quickly when they leave, maybe having built up a ranking in the holidays or events local to their colleges. There's also the financial aspect of a longer road to the top now, although I'm sure Emily Appleton would have been helped by the LTA in this regard (although maybe not given that Jay C struggled to get help). Plus its very attractive to the youngsters to grow up and grow their game out of the limelight of being one of the UK's next great hopes with all the public scrutiny that entails. I've heard another of our top girls is also being heavily recruited and seriously considering this route (no names as i have not seen it anywhere publicly) and with Jack Draper heading off too I think you are right that this now seems the way to go.
-- Edited by The Optimist on Saturday 4th of February 2017 08:56:04 AM
I can't see any reason why anyone other than a Bellis/Day/FAA/Shapovalov type wouldn't go to university. In addition to all the things you cite, Optimist, people are coming out with degrees - some from very good universities indeed - so that when they are finished playing tennis they should have no difficulty making the transition into other work if they want to do so. There's also the team aspect: I'm struck that players who have been together, especially those who have been together over four years, often seem (from what one reads) to be very mutually supportive. And that's a nice thing when you're on tour in a competitive individual sport.
And that's even assuming they stick it through 4 years to get a degree.
The credit system is so flexible that you can do 1 year or 2 years or whatever, and then bank your credits for later in life and finish your degree of then, if you want to. i.e. you're not making a firm four year commitment.
My hope, more importantly, is that the chance of going to college, or the great opportunity it presents, will make our players (and others, but British ones in particular as it seemed a real problem here) at least stay in education long enough to give themselves the chance.
If it stops them dropping out at age 15 or 16, then I think US college tennis will have done them a huge benefit, even if they never end up going.
Well Emily will get a thorough grounding in country and western and Vandy become an NCAA threat, she will have a great time. Vandy is a path well trodden by a number of the better British girls in US college tennis.
She is not in a dissimilar position to Cam and I am sure a similar amount of thought has been put into the decision.
What would be very interesting would be if Jodie chose the futures route, I feel their talent level is very similar. Good luck to both which ever route they choose.
-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Saturday 4th of February 2017 11:06:00 PM
Latest college rankings. These are based on results in the college system only, hence Cam's lowly position - he has hardly played within the college system this academic year.
Emily Arb in dubs is W6 / L2 but the strength of the opponents is taken into account as far as ranking points are concerned. Seems to be paired regularly with Taylor Davidson and they are playing at #1 in the lineup so they will get quality opponents as the season rolls on and I've no doubt they'll be ranked before too long.
The Women's Indoor Team Championships took place this weekend at Yale (teams qualified as a result of their efforts during the recent Kick-Off Weekend)
R16
#6 Georgia bt #10 Duke 4-1
Playing at line 6 #6 Mariana Gould (Georgia) bt Rebecca Smaller (Duke) 6-1, 6-3