Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 30 - WTA Premier 5 ($2.7M) - Montreal, Canada - Hard


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:
Week 30 - WTA Premier 5 ($2.7M) - Montreal, Canada - Hard


Jaggy1876 wrote:

I thought Heather had points coming off though? You are probably right though. Having said that only a matter of time I think until Naomi takes 2nd I think. The fact she can get results by not playing with with her ugly game helps. We don't have many players that win ugly.


 Except I don't think Hev has much to defend until the end of the year, and Naomi does.



-- Edited by philwrig on Tuesday 26th of July 2016 04:49:35 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23399
Date:

philwrig wrote:
Jaggy1876 wrote:

I thought Heather had points coming off though? You are probably right though. Having said that only a matter of time I think until Naomi takes 2nd I think. The fact she can get results by not playing with with her ugly game helps. We don't have many players that win ugly.


 Except I don't think Hev has much to defend until the end of the year, and Naomi does.



-- Edited by philwrig on Tuesday 26th of July 2016 04:49:35 PM


 According to the guru, Heather was only defending one point from this week, and next off is 90 from 15th August. But Naomi has 48 to defend from the week before, so it is going to be pretty close between them - if Naomi can keep winning.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40936
Date:

Naomi has overall quite a lot more points to defend by year end, just slightly alleviated by better scores in reserve.

210 of Heather counting points are due off by year end compared to 308 of Naomi's. And after Heather's 90 points on 15/08 Naomi's points are generally coming off earlier with all 308 points due off by the end of September. 

But in the short term if Naomi did beat Muguruza she would certainly go GB #2, not enough in itself for this coming Monday, but certainly for 15/08 since with the Olympics Heather will get in no prior defense of her 90 points due off then. So to that extent Jaggy is right, beat Muguruza and Naomi will be #2. To be fair he didn't actually originally say this coming Monday so I guess he'd win on that one  

www.britishtennis.net/stats/ptdf.htm?n=1

Anyway, let's hope they both find both better and winning form. Naomi's managing the latter pretty well just now.



-- Edited by indiana on Tuesday 26th of July 2016 08:23:33 PM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

JoKo up! Coverage available.
I don't expect much from her this week, might even lose or retire today. Rogers had some good wins here before, beating Genie in front of an adoring crowd, in her back yard at the top of her form.
Points here as it's Premier 5 are very quick to accumulate, so here's hoping for a Naomi v. JoKo R3!

__________________


ATP level

Status: Offline
Posts: 3128
Date:

Konta 2 - 1 up and serving

 

0-15

15-15

30-15

30-30

40-30

3-1

 

0-15

15-15

15-30

30-30

40-30

3-2

 



__________________


ATP level

Status: Offline
Posts: 3128
Date:

15-0

30-0

30-15

40-15

4-2

 

15-0

30-0

40-0

40-15

4-3



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2442
Date:

Extraordinarily unfair that Jo has to play the woman whose name is already on the trophy.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

wimdledont wrote:

Extraordinarily unfair that Jo has to play the woman whose name is already on the trophy.


Nice efficient set from Jo, pretty nondescript set; just got the job done without dramas. 6-4

Edit: add score



-- Edited by AliBlahBlah on Tuesday 26th of July 2016 08:59:15 PM

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11722
Date:

Does anyone know what happened to Katy D's doubles? It was supposed to be on before Em's doubles but no score was shown.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

DF wrote:

Does anyone know what happened to Katy D's doubles? It was supposed to be on before Em's doubles but no score was shown.


No idea. Pretty sure it wasn't moved to Montreal though

5 consecutive breaks to open set 2, the last by Jo in 5 points from 0-40*. Quality is pretty low. 6-4 *3-2



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Johanna working quite hard now to try and motivate herself and just get through, geeing herself up, as she's only playing about 40% of what she had in Stanford, which is understandable.
Just getting enough out of herself at the moment, 6-4 4-2*

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Consecutive DF from Shelby hand Jo the insurance break, 6-4 *5-2

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11722
Date:

AliBlahBlah wrote:
DF wrote:

Does anyone know what happened to Katy D's doubles? It was supposed to be on before Em's doubles but no score was shown.


No idea. Pretty sure it wasn't moved to Montreal though ;-


 Oops! Sorry!

Jo wins 6-4 6-2



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

Nicely done Jo
Adjusting from the lightning quick Stanford courts so quickly and all the elation and hullabaloo of the title can't be easy, so a good grounded professional performance today.

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2442
Date:

Happy days when an under-par performance fromm Jo results in a routine easy win over a decent top 60 player. 6-4, 6-2

I believe I overheard her complaining to her coach that she was having trouble adjusting to the bounce; so that'll get better. And she just kinda dozed off at the start of the second set.

But even without Serena, she has a lousy draw, with probably Babos next, to be followed an all-Brit clash in R3, unless Garbine beats Naomi.

__________________
«First  <  17 8 9 10 1120  >  Last»  | Page of 20  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard