Not sure how much Mr Downey really wants to hear the views of pros. He was pretty diverting in the early question about whether he'd like to hear Andy's views in more depth, talking about Andy being a very busy guy, new father and that his lead would be by example on the court.
And a bit of waffle at the end about the lack of real tennis folk on the LTA board. Oh a couple have played at county level you know and it's good to be diverse. As Mr Fuller said without getting anywhere shouldn't diverse include some with real professional tennis experience. Fuller actually on a few occasions started on points such as also the confused / inappropriate role of Bob Brett, only to be a bit drowned in Downey waffle and not get anywhere. Jonathan Overend might indeed have been better.
Yes, was quite a lot of sort of agreement in their different ways that tennis should be more "fun" at younger ages.
Naomi repeating some of her blog stuff like the constantly changing plans from one extreme to another being very unhelpful. Not sure Mr Downey convinced that having an interim Performance Director in place would create more ongoing certainty, that even if Mr Keen leaves much of his work will be the framework for the future.
A brief mention from a club coach, not followed up by anyone, about the almost total lack of communication from the LTA apart from just learning such and such has now changed ( often radically ) and a tennis ( now rower ) father said Alan Jones and Naomi spoke the most sense he'd heard in many a day. Well I'd say maybe more Naomi. Alan Jones seemed proud to plough his own path and just leave us alone, LTA.
Some seeming acknowledgement from Downey re how frustrating it has often been that young 'stars' have been taken away from the coaches and environment that has nurtured them but very unclear what the future plans are to turn around the barren boys years after Kyle's year. Some things are just cyclical said Mr Keen ( I think it was he ) or words to that effect, hmm.
-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 3rd of March 2016 11:15:23 PM
One word that seemed to crop up a lot was "status". I dare say it applies as much to the hiring of Canadian chief execs, high profile star coaches, even talented Performance Directors from other sports, as it does to spending £600 on travel etc so your son/daughter can win funding of £500 for being part of a group seen as having certain status. The LTA's hiring policies seem to scream short term, yet the language from those appointees is very much 7 years, 8 years, 10 years to achieve anything.
Naomi and Alan came over very well, but I got the impression that they are happy in their own little bubble(private coaching) and don't necessarily see the bigger picture with the less privileged.
Peter Keen seems very articulate and seems to know what he is doing, Michael Downey was disappointing. I got the impression he lacked knowledge about the previous issues and ended up trying to defend areas from the past. He didn't really look forward. I get the impression he is a money man and not a tennis man.
I do think things are changing, but the communication from the top is severely lacking - i.e nobody seems to know about the impending changes to junior funding.
Nice plug from Alan Jones about Finn Bass(although he didn't name him)
Pretty much agree with that summary, Paulisi. I was surprisingly impressed by Peter Keen. Think Alan J was saying that what makes a professional is their attitude, talent and the right coaching and that will never change and that some of the myriad of LTA initiatives just miss that point. Thought his plug described Alistair Gray though rather than Finn, as Finn has had a lot of official support and, because of his small physique Alistair did not. He also has a very tall mother!
-- Edited by The Optimist on Friday 4th of March 2016 07:23:34 AM
Going back to the new LTA policy; in some ways, it seems to make more sense than many that have preceded it. Firstly, it recognises that there may be 'senior pros' that need support - so presumably no more saying that if you leave the US system and start off at 23, you're going to be out of the matrix before you've even had a chance to get started. Secondly, while the 'aspirant' may be a bit vague, it means that you don't have the ludicrous situation where if you're at 225 you can't get funding and if you're at 199 you can. Personally, I'd like to have seen a little more flexibility with the 'senior' pros - it is ludicrous to me that Colin Fleming - ex-top-20- who had the hardest of knocks when his excellent partnership dissolved through no fault of his own, would fall entirely outside the funding system because he's at 58. A wee bit of investment in the Fleming/Erlich partnership would seem only sensible - and very likely to receive payback. Ditto Jonny Marray and the Skupskis.
Meanwhile Colette Lewis has published an interview with Martin Blackman, head of USTA player development. True, it is a lot easier when you start off with the USTA's situation. But even so - he seems, from the outside at least, to make a lot of sense: www.tennisrecruiting.net/article.asp. Valuing every player ... bringing more women into coaching ... using your former pros ... providing key support to Challenger-level players ... working with, not against, juniors' own coaches ...having a players council to give feedback on USTA decisions ... prioritising communication ...
And I particularly liked this:
CL: Have you made any mistakes in the last eight months?
MB: I've made a lot of mistakes ... None that I'm going to own up to, but I will say my approach to making mistakes is that when you recognize you've made a mistake, or someone points it out to you, you own up to it and you pick up the phone and you call the people that are affected immediately. That mitigates the effect of whatever it is. When you don't do that, try to justify it, or make excuses for it, or scapegoat people, then it becomes a major issue ....
-- Edited by Spectator on Friday 4th of March 2016 07:25:46 AM
The other thing that annoyed me was a fairly typical comment from Imogen Magner's dad that as Imogen progressed she had to play further away to find players of a similar level and costs increased.
Why not stay locally and play older players rather than stay in the age group.
I think his mentality is starting to change and more players are playing open age.
Another thing that I picked up on was trying to get more school children to play tennis.
There are several issues with this.
Firstly as stated in another thread, young players tend to start playing early if they are from a tennis background, i.e if their parents/family play. The big aim some be to attract people in their 20-40's back into the game, which would bring the uptake up when there children become interested.
If you start pushing tennis into schools, you have several issues:
1 - lack of facilities
2 - even with outdoor facilities you only have a short window to play
3 - even with four courts, you would struggle to get a full class on the courts at one time
4 - PE teachers are generally not trained to coach tennis - more the populist sports - football, rugby, athletics, cricket
5 - you have competition against numerous other sports
It is still very difficult for a talented tennis player at a state school to progress as you need so much time to play tournaments these days. Therefore I see that most of the kids playing tennis Europe or ITF juniors are home schooled or go to tennis academies or private schools that encourage these events and the time off.
It is a very expensive sport - coaching/equipment/court hire/travelling that it really is only open to the elite in this country even at junior level and this should be the big focus for the LTA.
if it is free or relatively cheap you will get lots more players turning up.
You receive funding up until the age of 25, if by that point you have not made enough (eg in top 100) to live off prize money, then your funding is stopped.
Far too soft in this country.
For all we know, we could still be funding Jamie Delgado, as he has a promising doubles career ahead.
Martin Weston
Jane O'Donoghue
Nick Weal
Jo Durie - may also be there.
Not easy to identify the players - Esther Adeshina is definitely there and the two other girls in the photos look like Hannah McColgan and Gemma Heath, but not 100% sure.