"....we know that we need to offer support to two categories of professional player who are above the age and performance level of the PSP pilot. These are:
Aspirant Pro: Players over 16 who are aspiring to break into the top 200 singles or top 50 doubles (Top 200S/50D)
Senior Pro: Players with an end of year ranking in the Top 200S/50D seeking to significantly improve their performance and ranking."
It then lists three different ways it intends to help (coaching, facilities etc) and also:
4. Direct financial support to help players reach a standard of performance likely to provide stable and complete financial independence from the LTA in the future. For players in the Top 200S/50D this will take the form of an annual underwrite of at least 50% of the costs associated with hiring personal coaching and support services, linked to an end of year Tour prize money payback. For players outside of the Top 200S/50D financial support will be in the form of a Career Development Grant.
Of course, a little transparency as to who has been selected etc. would be welcomed...
-- Edited by Coup Droit on Sunday 21st of February 2016 01:27:39 PM
The transparency is in the new numbers. Above and below 200 for singles. It's offered to anybody who meets the criteria.
It says 'aspiring to break into the top 200' for the first group - well that's absolutely everyone, surely. Right down to beginners.
And it says 'seeking to significantly improve their performance and ranking' for the second.
This is also subjective - they will all claim to be.
Even if you are right for the second group, (which you may well be) the key thing, for me, is the first group and this is most certainly not clear - there is no clear criteria except to be 'aspiring' to the top 200. I say that's the more important group because those in the top 200 (singles) have already, just about, managed to hack it, whether backed or not.
"Aspirant" and "aspiring" are terribly inappropriate words unless they intend to fund a heck of a lot of players. I assume it's those who they in their wisdom judge to have clear top 200 potential.
And I doubt there are that many senior pros not "seeking to significantly improve their performance and ranking", as if many top 200ers couldn't really care about that. More daft wording, and yes, another subjective call.
I wonder who wrote and signed off such piffle, which read logically questions whether most players are really out to be all they can be. They no doubt wanted to try and dilute the fact that so much remained subjective, but could have still done a much better wording job.
-- Edited by indiana on Sunday 21st of February 2016 04:01:26 PM
There is a limit on the money they are making available so it's going to be about 10 players from men, women (singles and doubles). A lot will depend on whether they have a team capable of helping them reach the target. I do wonder if the names of those given the grants will be made public
It's not exactly LTA funding but Maia is obviously getting a big lot of financial help from Tennis Scotland and the Scottish sports scholarship programme for student athletes, Winning Students
Great for Maia but compare and contrast with Johnny O'Mara. Same old same old, some get everything put in place to help them succeed and others sweet nothing. Maybe Maia is a vastly better prospect than Johnny. I couldn't say. I know Maia's game well but not Johnny's. But somehow I would imagine that any gulf in potential between them is not so great as the gulf in attitude and support would suggest.
Yes. Exactly. Although it does say that Maia seems happy to use the Stirling uni players as hitting partners and Jonny isn't.
And the Winning Students grant is obviously for elite sportspeople on academic courses, so Jonny wouldn't be entitled to that.
I completely agree, however, that the 'all or nothing' approach of the tennis authorities is daft and counter-productive in the big picture. And people like Jonny seem to be squeezed out, which is a real shame for the depth of our tennis.
Mind you, I will be interested to see of Jonny has chosen to play European team tennis this year. It seems harsh but I can't take anyone's complaints of lack of money too seriously if they don't.
NB I think the LTA are completely at fault in having a system where the players HAVE to play European team tennis.
But, from the players points of view, if you're committed and need the funds, take the simple choice and go where the funds are; if not, don't.
It can also tie in to be a perfect training block, with excellent hitting partners, and coaching. Most clubs would provide accommodation for the weeks of the league season (after all, they're paying airfares if not). Teams will get coaching throughout the period (and throughout the year). The other team members are automatic perfect level hitting partners. So, go there for a month, train, be coached, play competitive matches once a week (and be guaranteed paid for it).
Mind you, I will be interested to see of Jonny has chosen to play European team tennis this year. It seems harsh but I can't take anyone's complaints of lack of money too seriously if they don't.
Germany was mentioned in a conversation I had with Jonny a few days ago.
Good to have Naomi. Current active player might have added interest though probably easier for Naomi and she's pretty fresh from the coalface and has the ability to make a very good contribution.
Certainly will give it a listen, thanks.
Anyway look at the girls this week and the guys are beginning their Davis Cup defense. All's great
-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 3rd of March 2016 08:07:19 PM
Maia does have the advantage that at Stirling she can hit with guys, Johnny does not have that luxury in that technically the boys at Stirling are unlikely to be of a standard to facilitate evolution through the ITF to challenger level.
Not sure there was that much difference between the visions of Downey/Keen and those of Jones/Cavaday. The use of language was different; one side full of MBA/Management consultancy jargon, the other at times getting close to a Monty Python sketch on difficult childhoods.
The bit that resonated for me, was Alan Jones' comment about tennis being an incredibly tough sport at the professional level.
-- Edited by kundalini on Thursday 3rd of March 2016 10:23:22 PM