Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 26 & 27 - Wimbledon - main draw (grass)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39466
Date:
Weeks 26 & 27 - Wimbledon - main draw (grass)


Ax well as disappointing general commentary, it seems to me the amount of bull**** regarding facts and figures this year from the BBC commenttators and pundits is at an all time high and that comes with at times fairly limited watching on my part ( though yes, most of the media come out with rickets quite often ).  

For instance I like John Mac in many ways, but after Dimitrov lost in R3 ( and with his SF points for last year coming off ), he kept repeating that Dimitrov would now be dropping out of the top 25 ( even the top 30 at times ), Err, really ?!



-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 9th of July 2015 10:02:23 AM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39466
Date:

philwrig wrote:

Winning ugly at the moment, just hoping he has another gear to go to, because Fed has been the form player of the tournament, and on what we have seen so far, he would take the semi for me.


 

Yes, Fed has definitely looked better, whereas coming into the event I certainly had Andy marked as favourite if they clashed in the SF. 

I can certainly still see Andy winning, but he needs to be consistently closer to his A game. 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 53005
Date:

insomniacfolder wrote:

I wish I didn't feel so intimidated about ever posting in the Andy Murray section of the Andy Murray forum, but I do - a memorable post from AliBlahBlah summed it up

gerry70 wrote:

Anyone else disappointed with BBC commentators or is it just me? 


Luckily for me I grew up listening to Dan Maskell.
Everyone's always going to be a step down from there, so I just tune them all out these days.
I do wish Jonathan Overend still did regular tennis commentary though, as I found him tolerable.
I know the BBC have no friends here, but only vehement and regular detractors on the forum; I still like their tennis production best though. I don't need anything other than the pictures really, without interruption, be that from advertising, expert analysis or other gimmicks (oh boy! have I ever phrased that sentence very particularly; with malice of forethought even)


Ah, dear old "Ooh, I say" Dan, God rest his soul.  I'll second those sentiments.

I'm not especially anti-Beeb.  I don't have satellite/cable channels, so welcome the "free-to-air", ad-free coverage of Wimbledon.  Nor do I have a problem with Virginia Wade, who seems regularly to get up RJA's nose, & many of the other BBC commentators, with the possible exception of "Bouncy" & John Lloyd, but, as a professional linguist, I find myself tearing my hair out when I hear Sue Barker et al regularly failing to do their homework & referring to Garbiñe Muguruza, for example, as "Garbine", rhyming with "Carbine", or Florin Mergea as "Mer-gay-a"  (it's "mer-dzha", for God's sake [a hardened version of the French word for "I", "je", but not as hard as the "g" in "get"]:  Romanian is a Latin-based language & there's plenty of help available on the Net, if they would but look for it! furious  But then, sadly, I doubt they actually care... disbelief ).  Even the umpires get it wrong, too!  As for the Yanks' innate inability to shorten the "o" sound in names like "Djokovic" (at least our lot get that right...!), I give up... smash.gif 

Am unfamiliar with JO's commentaries, so am in no position to comment.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Like SC, I welcome the BBC coverage ... and especially Five Live. Apart from a certain tendency towards breathless hyperbole re: our own players which must (occasionally) seem a bit much to those not from Britain's shores, it's pretty good. And yesterday, with Rod Laver and Andy Roddick, I thought there were some real gems ... not the quips that seem to be getting attention, but moments where the players offered real insights.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 52448
Date:

I agree, Stircrazy - Sue Barker's pronunciation (and others) drives me mad /makes me laugh.

It even applies to their own team - Marion says she has given up telling everyone her name is Bartoli, Italian, accent on the penultimate syllable - like macaroni. She just knows she's fighting a losing battle and accepts it's Bartoli, like Barnaby.

And why are Lloyd and Castle calling the doubles player ' El - rich' when his name is ' Er - lich' ???

Mind you, does anyone know in Russian, how should the 'ova' names be pronounced?

Why do the commentators say Sharapova (emphasis on a long 'o') ? And yet say 'Kuznetsova' (emphasis on the 'net' and with no long 'o')?

If you go through all the 'ova' names, it seems to be random when they say it one way or the other..... I would have thought they'd be the same . . .



__________________
TMH


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1776
Date:

Yeah I've noticed the 'El-rick' thing too - that's really, really poor from Bradnam. But then he did pronounce it correctly at the interval. Bizarre. Bradnam's actually one of the few commentators I don't particularly mind on the BBC, although that may be because I've not heard him too often.

Murray and Peers lost the first set, levelled it up and have just won 5 games in a row to take a 2-1 lead and break immediately in the fourth. Keep it together boys...

4-6, 6-3, 6-4, 2-0*.

__________________
TMH


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1776
Date:

J&J break again for a *4-1 lead. So close...

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Why, oh why is 5 Live running some question show when Murray and Peers are two games away from making the doubles final?!?!?!?

Edit; In fairness, there are some interesting things being said. But at such a moment to make no reference to what's happening?



-- Edited by Spectator on Thursday 9th of July 2015 06:25:58 PM



-- Edited by Spectator on Thursday 9th of July 2015 06:27:34 PM

__________________


Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:



Mind you, does anyone know in Russian, how should the 'ova' names be pronounced?

Why do the commentators say Sharapova (emphasis on a long 'o') ? And yet say 'Kuznetsova' (emphasis on the 'net' and with no long 'o')?

If you go through all the 'ova' names, it seems to be random when they say it one way or the other..... I would have thought they'd be the same . . .


 I read years ago that it should be pronounced with the emphasis on the second syllable, like Kuznetsova, but that when she moved to the USA the Americans kept pronouncing it with the long "o" and she decided just to accept it. In the same way, Bernard Tomic accepts the Ozzie pronunciation of Tomick instead of Tomitch.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Yes! (Oops - wrong thread. That's in recognition of the J Murray/J Peers victory!)



-- Edited by Spectator on Thursday 9th of July 2015 06:32:54 PM

__________________
TMH


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1776
Date:

They've done it. biggrin

Huge well done to the pair of them. 



__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

TMH wrote:

Yeah I've noticed the 'El-rick' thing too - that's really, really poor from Bradnam. But then he did pronounce it correctly at the interval. Bizarre. Bradnam's actually one of the few commentators I don't particularly mind on the BBC, although that may be because I've not heard him too often.

Murray and Peers lost the first set, levelled it up and have just won 5 games in a row to take a 2-1 lead and break immediately in the fourth. Keep it together boys...

4-6, 6-3, 6-4, 2-0*.


 Bradnam has the advantage of commentating week in week out, although that is mainly the WTA tour, but it still means he's ahead of alot of the rest of the field who mostly don't. Simon Reed's lack of knowledge in particular has stood out for me.



__________________
TMH


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1776
Date:

Only just realised I was posting in the Andy thread earlier. Oops! Oh well.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 52448
Date:

TMH wrote:

Only just realised I was posting in the Andy thread earlier. Oops! Oh well.


 

Don't worry - don't expect Andy will mind smile

Guess he might just have other things on his mind today  . . .



__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

My bold prediction, Fed in 3 or Andy in 4 or 5.

__________________
«First  <  14 5 6 7 8  >  Last»  | Page of 8  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard