Katie Boulter lost a very tight match 6-7(5) 6-7(2)
A pretty encouraging scoreline considering how good Katerina Stewart is. Her having already beaten Saisai Zheng and Mathilde Johansson this year, both ranked in top 150 WTA at the time, as well as the Beygelzimer result noted elsewhere.
Katie Boulter lost a very tight match 6-7(5) 6-7(2)
A pretty encouraging scoreline considering how good Katerina Stewart is. Her having already beaten Saisai Zheng and Mathilde Johansson this year, both ranked in top 150 WTA at the time, as well as the Beygelzimer result noted elsewhere.
But she's top 450 pro singles herself with many of posters on this forum tipping her for top 100 hood....... and having got to 2 TBs, lost them both. It's a loss in the first round of a Grand Slam she's travelled thousands of miles to play in.......surely she'd be disappointed rather than encouraged.
You've got a point, Korriban. I'd hardly call the score encouraging - 'respectable', yes, but not encouraging.
A propos of nothing, in her plans at the start of the year, in fact, she said she wasn't going to play the US juniors, but was going to stop all juniors after Wimbledon. Wonder why her plans changed ?
Katie Boulter lost a very tight match 6-7(5) 6-7(2)
A pretty encouraging scoreline considering how good Katerina Stewart is. Her having already beaten Saisai Zheng and Mathilde Johansson this year, both ranked in top 150 WTA at the time, as well as the Beygelzimer result noted elsewhere.
But she's top 450 pro singles herself with many of posters on this forum tipping her for top 100 hood....... and having got to 2 TBs, lost them both. It's a loss in the first round of a Grand Slam she's travelled thousands of miles to play in.......surely she'd be disappointed rather than encouraged.
I'm sure there's room for both: the former short-term, the latter long-term.