Sadly Andy has zero chance of winning SPOTY, because the US open is not Wimby and not being popular with the masses. It's either going to be Mo or Bradley Wiggins.
Still hasn't sunk in, probably going to take a few months. I actually started following Andy closely from June 2005 onwards, not as impressive as Maddy !
I really do think Andy's got much more chance than you suggest, Phil. I think there was wide awareness that he was a non slam winner, including wide reasonable and unreasonable criticism. And now wide recognition that he has now got that monkey off his back on top of his Wimbledon final and Olympic gold, which of course were much more in the public eye.
In much more general forums i have been in I see that recognition and his name being quite generally banded with Wiggins and Farah. Of course, the US Open is far from Wimbledon in the overall general British mindeset, and I think he might well lose out, but I am sure that he will get a very strrong vote this year and I think top 3 more than likely.
I was pleasantly surprised that he came 5th last year, OK with Cav beating everyone by a mile, so even allowing for the tremedous general Olympic achievements ( including his own ! ), I put him right up there in the way I suggest.
-- Edited by indiana on Tuesday 11th of September 2012 04:36:43 PM
I agree that top 3 is probable, and maybe it's a bit extreme to say no chance, but the Olympics is just going to dominate that awards ceremony so whereas the bookies give him a decent outside shot I think he'll do well but fall short at the end of the day.
I think its also the case that this is fresh news, so people are bound to talk about it. I remember when Laura won junior Wimby and I thought she's a dead cert to win YSPOTY award but Ellie Simmonds won it comfortably. I really hope Andy gets very close to winning but would be shocked if he were actually to do so.
-- Edited by philwrig on Tuesday 11th of September 2012 06:08:27 PM
it shows that really it's a bit silly, Greg won it for reaching a final (nothing to disrespect Greg was and still is a great achievement). Didn't Zara Phillips win it, along with Ryan Giggs recently? Yes it's an Olympics year, maybe they need to do 2 separate ones or something.
Possibly Murray needs a new wining 'trademark', the twin finger sky point just doesn't have the same panache as a mo-bot.
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
it shows that really it's a bit silly, Greg won it for reaching a final (nothing to disrespect Greg was and still is a great achievement). Didn't Zara Phillips win it, along with Ryan Giggs recently? Yes it's an Olympics year, maybe they need to do 2 separate ones or something.
Possibly Murray needs a new wining 'trademark', the twin finger sky point just doesn't have the same panache as a mo-bot.
Sadly Andy has zero chance of winning SPOTY, because the US open is not Wimby and not being popular with the masses. It's either going to be Mo or Bradley Wiggins.
Still hasn't sunk in, probably going to take a few months. I actually started following Andy closely from June 2005 onwards, not as impressive as Maddy !
Suddenly things seem to be opening up for Andy - the seemingly unpassable wall of the big 3 seems to be dispersing :
Fed - Winning Wimby might have been his last hurrah, certainly a gold medal and slam winning Andy won't have any fears now of an aging Fed who he whipped in 3 straight on Fed's home turf.
Rafa - Legs have gone. He'll pop up from time to time and keep winning RG of course, but I can't see him winning that many more non RG slams. He'd clearly not been fit for 2 of the 3 non clay slams this year.
Djoko - He's still the problem, but showing a few weak spots now after his near 4 slam run. Breaking his duck by beating Djok in a slam final certainly evens up up a bit against him now. Andy can go in against him feeling its an even match from now on.
Summary - it's now a big 4 now and once Andy gets the number 2 spot he'll have an easier run to GS finals where there's no one who he won't fancy beating now.
it shows that really it's a bit silly, Greg won it for reaching a final (nothing to disrespect Greg was and still is a great achievement). Didn't Zara Phillips win it, along with Ryan Giggs recently? Yes it's an Olympics year, maybe they need to do 2 separate ones or something.
Possibly Murray needs a new wining 'trademark', the twin finger sky point just doesn't have the same panache as a mo-bot.
or do a tsonga?
God forbid. I like Tsonga, but every time he does that daft dance I want to slap him!
As I watched in the small hours of last night, I couldn't help remember doing likewise for the Aptos and Binghampton Challengers, and that was only livescores.
Funny, i thought back to those aswell. shredded nerves, mixed with a feeling that he was on the cusp of something big... mixed with late night euphoria when he did it... happy days :)
What a day. What a lovely day, spent at least in part (when not working) reading story after story finally giving credit to Mr Murray. (Steven, if you read this, thanks for your tweets of various stories ... and if you have time, take a look at Le Monde, which has a fantastic article/set of photos, as does the New York Times, on the triumph of British sport overall this summer. Made me think of you, with all your Olympic, as well as tennis, experience!)
I don't follow tennis as much as many of you (though I've followed Murray ever since I wondered who this unknown team was that was beating Erlich and Ram in the Davis Cup ... and then through this website learned more about and began to follow GB's various men and women players). And I don't know as much as ... well pretty well any of you on this board. But it's been really lovely to share the amazing British Tennis accomplishments of this summer -- from Watson, Murray and Marray at Wimbledon to Murray and Robson at the Olympics to Robson, Konta, Broady, Edmund and Murray at the US Open -- with such a knowledgeable, witty and kind group of people, and to know when the fifth set ended this morning at 2:00 am that there were lots of other people equally (or more) excited. Even if the excitement is much wider now than it used to be ... the person with whom I share an office arrived this morning grinning from ear to ear and an elderly neighbour, when I said I'd had a long night, said "For the obvious reasons, I assume!" ... the board members who have been following players at all ranks and with a genuine respect for their talents and personality are the people with whom one can best rejoice. Thank you!
-- Edited by Spectator on Tuesday 11th of September 2012 11:04:28 PM
As I watched in the small hours of last night, I couldn't help remember doing likewise for the Aptos and Binghampton Challengers, and that was only livescores.
Funny, i thought back to those aswell. shredded nerves, mixed with a feeling that he was on the cusp of something big... mixed with late night euphoria when he did it... happy days :)
Those dedicated tournament threads with his current ranking and all the "what ifs" depending on how the players within a few places above and below him did, and following it round by round. Yes, folk he really might get to WR 46 this week, but only if...
Sadly Andy has zero chance of winning SPOTY, because the US open is not Wimby and not being popular with the masses. It's either going to be Mo or Bradley Wiggins.
Still hasn't sunk in, probably going to take a few months. I actually started following Andy closely from June 2005 onwards, not as impressive as Maddy !
I really do think Andy's got much more chance than you suggest, Phil. I think there was wide awareness that he was a non slam winner, including wide reasonable and unreasonable criticism. And now wide recognition that he has now got that monkey off his back on top of his Wimbledon final and Olympic gold, which of course were much more in the public eye.
In much more general forums i have been in I see that recognition and his name being quite generally banded with Wiggins and Farah. Of course, the US Open is far from Wimbledon in the overall general British mindeset, and I think he might well lose out, but I am sure that he will get a very strrong vote this year and I think top 3 more than likely.
I was pleasantly surprised that he came 5th last year, OK with Cav beating everyone by a mile, so even allowing for the tremedous general Olympic achievements ( including his own ! ), I put him right up there in the way I suggest.
-- Edited by indiana on Tuesday 11th of September 2012 04:36:43 PM
agree as well, most people on my facebook were talking about it and most i'd have though wern't tennis fans beyond wimbledon, i think 4 or 5 years ago this would have been the case but whenever murray is in a slam it seem the country now goes tennis crazy! (mind you i am from scotland and he is treated like a god up here!)
To be honest I expect Wiggins to win it and frankly I wouldn't have a problem with that. Winning the Tour de France was a massive achievement that is at least on par with Andy winning the US Open.
To be honest I expect Wiggins to win it and frankly I wouldn't have a problem with that. Winning the Tour de France was a massive achievement that is at least on par with Andy winning the US Open.
If I didn't vote for Andy I'd vote for Mo. I believe our cyclists success is primarily a by product of a world class system. We seem to have a plethora of world class cyclists which suggests to me we do not have individual brilliance rather a system headed by arguably the world's best coach in Brailsford achieving world class results.