Actually I am not one of those people who bitches about "Super Saturday". Yes I know it is done almost solely for TV and yes playing the SF and Final back to back is a tough ask but no one said that winning a Grand Slam was supposed to be easy. It is essentially the same for both finalists, yes playing Wed-Sat-Sun is probably better than Thur-Sat-Sun, but almost no scheduling is entirely fair.
Oh, its much better nowadays than in the past when the second men's semi final was a night match, played after the women's final !
While it may be largely the same now for both players, I would prefer the players to be more rested for the final and in better condition to give of their best in the final.
But I admit I do not understand any of the details about how much they would lose TV money etc if switching to a more player friendly ( and possibly better quality tennis ) schedule.
I guess I'm saying in an ideal world, you just wouldn't...
Oh, its much better nowadays than in the past when the second men's semi final was a night match, played after the women's final !
While it may be largely the same now for both players, I would prefer the players to be more rested for the final and in better condition to give of their best in the final.
I don't recall them ever playing a SF on a Saturday night (I could easily be wrong) but I do remember them playing one SF on the Friday night and one on the Saturday afternoon.
As for the players being rested. I undertsand that argument but part of me likes the idea of great touraments offering a unique challenge that isn't faced elsewhere.
Andy sounded and looked very relaxed and at ease with himself on Eurosport in an interview with Mark Petchey recorded yesterday.
He said Arthur Ashe is playing a bit slower this year with the other two main courts noticeably faster. Re speed, he said Cincinnati was just two quick this year, partly to do with the balls they were using as well as the court itself, with not really enough time to react and get in position, and it will be better here.
Interesting, in that I have always though fast hard courts suited Andy and one reason he usually did well at Cincinnati, since he has such ball sense and good reactions. I tended to believe that the seeming general slowing of Slam courts ( actually excluding the French Open ! ) was to his disadvantage.
-- Edited by indiana on Monday 27th of August 2012 05:12:26 PM
For those who can see what is happening, is Mr Murray playing as ... rustily ... as the live scores would suggest?
Yes. It's ugly. First set contained a series of extraordinary points that Andy had total control of then would put a drop shot wide, or a pass wide, when he had no need to go anywhere near the line as Bogomolov was on the other side of the court. Some of Andy's shots have missed the target by more than 6ft! While serves from the deuce court down the middle were, at times, going straight down the court, not moving an inch towards the target destination.
6-2 6-4
-- Edited by kundalini on Monday 27th of August 2012 09:14:27 PM
The overall tale : ( The receiving points won are wrong, should be 52 / 93 and 39 / 92, but for some nonsensical reason DFs here get counted twice in the number of total points, which is err just plain wrong, and I'm sure I've seen this before. You could vaguely make an arguement for taking the DFs off the receiving points "won", but not adding to the total points played ). Clear that Andy was well on top of Bogomolov's 2nd serve as kundalini said :
Ugly is the word, hopefully he'll be reenergised for his next match.
My limited theory at this point, is could he be still mentally drained from doing so well at Wimby and the Olympics? Never has had time to recover from either tournament properly. Spoke on Sky about needing to have just a few days by himself last weekend. Just a theory, hopefully a completely bogus one and we'll see a much better performance in the next round.
-- Edited by philwrig on Monday 27th of August 2012 11:19:03 PM
Andy sounded and looked very relaxed and at ease with himself on Eurosport in an interview with Mark Petchey recorded yesterday.
He said Arthur Ashe is playing a bit slower this year with the other two main courts noticeably faster. Re speed, he said Cincinnati was just two quick this year, partly to do with the balls they were using as well as the court itself, with not really enough time to react and get in position, and it will be better here.
Interesting, in that I have always though fast hard courts suited Andy and one reason he usually did well at Cincinnati, since he has such ball sense and good reactions. I tended to believe that the seeming general slowing of Slam courts ( actually excluding the French Open ! ) was to his disadvantage.
-- Edited by indiana on Monday 27th of August 2012 05:12:26 PM
Interesting, sounds like the exact same interview they just used on Sky.
I noticed that the US Open website has one of the keys to a Murray victory being "Keep first serve percentage more than 67%". Currently it is 28% and he's winning 5-2*
Must be nice to be able to play a stinker (in your own exalted terms) and still beat a top 100 player 2, 4 and 1. Glad he's through, and hope he's got his jitters all out in that match!