Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 35-36: US Open - Hard
RJA


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9639
Date:
RE: Week 35-36: US Open - Hard


Actually I am not one of those people who bitches about "Super Saturday". Yes I know it is done almost solely for TV and yes playing the SF and Final back to back is a tough ask but no one said that winning a Grand Slam was supposed to be easy. It is essentially the same for both finalists, yes playing Wed-Sat-Sun is probably better than Thur-Sat-Sun, but almost no scheduling is entirely fair.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39512
Date:

Oh, its much better nowadays than in the past when the second men's semi final was a night match, played after the women's final ! 

While it may be largely the same now for both players, I would prefer the players to be more rested for the final and in better condition to give of their best in the final. 

But I admit I do not understand any of the details about how much they would lose TV money etc  if switching to a more player friendly ( and possibly better quality tennis ) schedule.

I guess I'm saying in an ideal world, you just wouldn't...



__________________
RJA


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9639
Date:

indiana wrote:

Oh, its much better nowadays than in the past when the second men's semi final was a night match, played after the women's final ! 

While it may be largely the same now for both players, I would prefer the players to be more rested for the final and in better condition to give of their best in the final.


 

I don't recall them ever playing a SF on a Saturday night (I could easily be wrong) but I do remember them playing one SF on the Friday night and one on the Saturday afternoon.

As for the players being rested. I undertsand that argument but part of me likes the idea of great touraments offering a unique challenge that isn't faced elsewhere.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39512
Date:

Stosur rapped up her match in plenty of time for Andy to get going at 6 pm BST as scheduled.

Then the heavens opened and are still open, so sometime.....



-- Edited by indiana on Monday 27th of August 2012 04:55:10 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39512
Date:

Andy sounded and looked very relaxed and at ease with himself on Eurosport in an interview with Mark Petchey recorded yesterday.

He said Arthur Ashe is playing a bit slower this year with the other two main courts noticeably faster.  Re speed, he said Cincinnati was just two quick this year, partly to do with the balls they were using as well as the court itself, with not really enough time to react and get in position, and it will be better here.

Interesting, in that I have always though fast hard courts suited Andy and one reason he usually did well at Cincinnati, since he has such ball sense and good reactions.  I tended to believe that the seeming general slowing of Slam courts ( actually excluding the French Open ! ) was to his disadvantage.



-- Edited by indiana on Monday 27th of August 2012 05:12:26 PM

__________________


Specialist Reporter + Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
Date:

Spectator wrote:

For those who can see what is happening, is Mr Murray playing as ... rustily ... as the live scores would suggest?


 Yes. It's ugly. First set contained a series of extraordinary points that Andy had total control of then would put a drop shot wide, or a pass wide, when he had no need to go anywhere near the line as Bogomolov was on the other side of the court. Some of Andy's shots have missed the target by more than 6ft! While serves from the deuce court down the middle were, at times, going straight down the court, not moving an inch towards the target destination.

6-2 6-4



-- Edited by kundalini on Monday 27th of August 2012 09:14:27 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39512
Date:

The overall tale :  ( The receiving points won are wrong, should be 52 / 93  and  39 / 92, but for some nonsensical reason DFs here get counted twice in the number of total points, which is err just plain wrong, and I'm sure I've seen this before. You could vaguely make an arguement for taking the DFs off the receiving points "won", but not adding to the total points played ).  Clear that Andy was well on top of Bogomolov's 2nd serve as kundalini said : 

Andy Murray (GBR) Alex Bogomolov Jr. (RUS)
7 Aces1
5 Double faults2
45 of 92 = 49 % 1st serves in67 of 93 = 72 %
30 of 45 = 67 % 1st serve points won36 of 67 = 54 %
23 of 47 = 49 % 2nd serve points won5 of 26 = 19 %
132 MPH Fastest serve122 MPH
109 MPH Average 1st serve speed106 MPH
85 MPH Average 2nd serve speed91 MPH
18 of 25 = 72 % Net points won28 of 42 = 67 %
9 of 19 = 47 % Break points won4 of 12 = 33 %
52 of 95 = 55 % Receiving points won39 of 97 = 40 %
46 Winners24
31 Unforced errors35
105 Total points won80

 



-- Edited by indiana on Monday 27th of August 2012 09:45:24 PM

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

Ugly is the word, hopefully he'll be reenergised for his next match.

My limited theory at this point, is could he be still mentally drained from doing so well at Wimby and the Olympics? Never has had time to recover from either tournament properly. Spoke on Sky about needing to have just a few days by himself last weekend. Just a theory, hopefully a completely bogus one and we'll see a much better performance in the next round.



-- Edited by philwrig on Monday 27th of August 2012 11:19:03 PM

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

indiana wrote:

Andy sounded and looked very relaxed and at ease with himself on Eurosport in an interview with Mark Petchey recorded yesterday.

He said Arthur Ashe is playing a bit slower this year with the other two main courts noticeably faster.  Re speed, he said Cincinnati was just two quick this year, partly to do with the balls they were using as well as the court itself, with not really enough time to react and get in position, and it will be better here.

Interesting, in that I have always though fast hard courts suited Andy and one reason he usually did well at Cincinnati, since he has such ball sense and good reactions.  I tended to believe that the seeming general slowing of Slam courts ( actually excluding the French Open ! ) was to his disadvantage.



-- Edited by indiana on Monday 27th of August 2012 05:12:26 PM


 Interesting, sounds like the exact same interview they just used on Sky.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39512
Date:

Breakee break,  2 games all with 4 breaks !

Andy 2 points from 10 on serve, 3 first serves in.

Early days  smile



__________________


Specialist Reporter + Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
Date:

I noticed that the US Open website has one of the keys to a Murray victory being "Keep first serve percentage more than 67%". Currently it is 28% and he's winning 5-2*

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39512
Date:

Yes, was just going to mention that 1st serve % !    Ah, well at least the breaks became one way.  6 - 2 the first set.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

For those who can see what is happening, is Mr Murray playing as ... rustily ... as the live scores would suggest?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39512
Date:

Wey, overall Ist serve % now hits 50%  ( 43 / 86 )     4 - 1 *   third set



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Must be nice to be able to play a stinker (in your own exalted terms) and still beat a top 100 player 2, 4 and 1. Glad he's through, and hope he's got his jitters all out in that match!

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 431  >  Last»  | Page of 31  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard