Not an easy draw, but then there aren't many of them at this level. And Andy sometimes seems to make a hows-yer-father of what seems an easy draw anyway.
Nalbandian is one of those players - like Hewitt and Ferrer - where you wonder how the hell they do it.
He has no "weapons" (sorry to use that ghastly cliche), he's noticeably overweight, and he doesn't seem to give a damn. In spite of that, he's been at the top of the game for what seems like forever.
My money's on him to beat Andy. Or it would be if I was sad enough to do betting.
__________________
"Where Ratty leads - the rest soon follow" (Professor Henry Brubaker - The Institute of Studies)
Nalbandian is one of those players - like Hewitt and Ferrer - where you wonder how the hell they do it.
He has no "weapons" (sorry to use that ghastly cliche), he's noticeably overweight, and he doesn't seem to give a damn. In spite of that, he's been at the top of the game for what seems like forever.
My money's on him to beat Andy. Or it would be if I was sad enough to do betting.
My fictional money is on Andy. Out of interest why do you call betting "sad" ?