It will be Almagro next for Andy. H2H is 1 all, I think, but Andy lost on clay and won on hard. Both very tight matches if I remember correctly (which isn't a given, by any means)
Last match on Stadium 1 today - which means some ungodly hour of the morning here I suspect!
-- Edited by Madeline on Wednesday 17th of March 2010 10:28:20 AM
Yes, I remember watching Almagro win at Roland Garros in 4 sets in the last 32 in 2008. He sort of ground it out, but I didn't think particularly impressively in more of his environment ( well before Andy, the new claycourter of last year ), and Andy could have won that match.
I see the other was a 7 - 6 6 -2 win to Andy in Cincinnati last August which I don't really recall.
Almagro is a brilliant striker of the ball off both wings with a strong serve but mentally is all over the place, something which has earned him the nickname Al-mug-ro on AM.com and in my mind has asserted his status as probably the no.1 PEM ahead of Rock On and Verdasco
almagro turns on this apparant injury, really annoys me when players do that, he looked fine, certainly didnt restrict his movement, just couldn't take a beatdown
Andy's match is at a watchable time tomorrow, at least if you are not an "early to bed, early to rise" type. It is the third match on Stadium 1, with a ladies match at noon (7pmGMT), the Robredo/Roddick match not before 2pm (9pm GMT) and then Andy. So, 11pm or so?
I'm not prepared to pay the £400 per year to get Sky Sports, so maybe this is an alternative. Does anybody know the bitrate that the ATP streaming service offers? Is the ball clearly visible in a rally? And what about Karlovic serve?
I'm not prepared to pay the £400 per year to get Sky Sports, so maybe this is an alternative. Does anybody know the bitrate that the ATP streaming service offers? Is the ball clearly visible in a rally? And what about Karlovic serve?
Thanks.
Steve
The bitrates available are 450K, 850K and 1 MB and I find the quality of the stream to be excellent, even at full screen - it's a bit blurry at full screen if you're up close, but not that blurry if you view it from the same distance as you would a TV screen of the same size.
The quality of the streams has improved markedly since they first offered them and it's at least as good as SD BBC Iplayer on a full-size TV, if you have any experience of that.
You can clearly see the ball in all the rallies (which wasn't the case when they first started doing it a few years back) - I can specifically check how easy it is to follow the Roddick serve tonight if you want me to.
If you're not watching it full screen you also get massively detailed hawkeye coverage off to one side, which goes way beyond what you see on TV. Their commentators are pretty good too.
I like seagull's idea too, but it depends how many of the Masters tournaments you want to watch.
-- Edited by steven on Friday 19th of March 2010 10:22:00 AM
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Not to mention you get quite a few 500 tournament matches as well. I renewed my subscription without a second thought. We don't have Sky - my husband is totally against putting any money in Murdoch's pocket! - and I don't press for it as all we would watch is the sports channel and you can't get that on its own, which makes it very expensive.
Not to mention the fact that as he is no tennis fan I would have to fight him for the remote control and he is much stronger than I am