British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

wolf wrote:

---

The second one.

The purpose of doping would be to improve your fitness.

Tara's fitness is not very good.

And the fact her fitness is not good ties in with what she says about eating a lot of meat.

Isn't the answer obvious?

---

 Understand the logic - but presumably anyone caught doping (whether they deliberately did so or not) wouldnt continue to dope after being caught and whilst under ongoing appeal? That would be madness. So I cant imagine for one moment she was doping when at Ilkley, if she doped before. 

I think I also mentioned she appeared to be eating some sort of chicken curry wrap at Ilkley, the same as the lady with her (I think it was Sam Murray-Sharan, but dont know the players well enough to be sure) 

wolf wrote:

---

The second one.

The purpose of doping would be to improve your fitness.

Tara's fitness is not very good.

And the fact her fitness is not good ties in with what she says about eating a lot of meat.

Isn't the answer obvious?

---

 She was presumably not doping when Jon saw her!

I don't know when that was but wasn't it far removed from that Bogota tournament?

I don't think there is any obvious answer here on what we know.

wolf wrote:

---

I'm saying she's NOT doping.

Jeez.

---

 That's a bit unfair, Wolf. 

Per Indy, Ilkley was just weeks ago, and she didnt appear to be eating lots then. 

BTW, read your note again and understand the point better. But I do think saying jeez is a bit over the top; don't you? Perhaps you are just having a bad day!   

Anyway, what I am saying is clearly she isnt doping now, but that doesnt mean she wasnt doping around the time she got caught