Played well. Roger rather fell to pieces after missing out on his 3 bps in that one game in the 2nd set. Mentally, Federer seems fragile while Andy appeared confident in his own ability.
Backhand perhaps wasn't as good as it might have been but the serving was excellent and his forehand is beginning to look like a good shot.
It seems to me that Andy really has Roger's number. The two Federer wins are back when Andy was a baby tennis player not yet in the top 100 and at the US open when nerves got the better of him (and Fed suddenly realised he had one match to win or fail to win a grand slam in 2008).
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
At this point I like Andy in a best of 3 against anyone. However he has to watch for a let down and if he doesnt return well agains Roddick he may not win easily. But he should!
I think Andy has always played well against 'big' opponents and often lost to players well below him on the rankings. The difference in the last year is that he has started to show some consistency, and is beatng the people he should. Federer just looked like he couldn't be ars*d at times. Sometimes we all feel that way