Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Wimbledon Juniors 2008.


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 789
Date:
RE: Wimbledon Juniors 2008.


Jade Curtis loses. Disappointing from a girl who looked like she was making strides into the main women's circuit

__________________

I will change the face of tennis



Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3413
Date:

Robson wins 6-0 6-4. Just checked the rankings out today and they have her at 36. Next highest ranked 94 born girl is at 138. Amazing

__________________

Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive....  those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience



Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3790
Date:

And the jump from 138 to 36 is much harder than getting to 138.

It would have been good to put Laura on televised court tomorrow as i think she might struggle but if she goes out and plays her game she could pull off the big upset.

__________________

Good luck Team GBR in 2016!!!



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18651
Date:

Disappointed that Laura v Melanie Oudin is not on a televised court (second match court 7)

Missing results:

Dan Cox won 62 46 62
Michael T lost 61 62
Dan Smethurst won 63 63

Tara/Heather won their doubles
Mathew James/Matthew Short lost to the second seeds

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Laura's ranking is brilliant, but be realistic in one thing - she's older than almost every player in her year who's capable of challenging her talentwise, which is the biggest reason behind her being so ahead of the so called pack.

I'm more impressed about how well she does against girls capble of winning at Tour/Challenger level, like Oudin or Broady.



Shame that you guys can't watch her. cry.gif But it's to be expected because no one in Britain cares about Juniors.

__________________

  



Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 261
Date:

Greenleaf wrote:

Laura's ranking is brilliant, but be realistic in one thing - she's older than almost every player in her year who's capable of challenging her talentwise, which is the biggest reason behind her being so ahead of the so called pack.

I'm more impressed about how well she does against girls capble of winning at Tour/Challenger level, like Oudin or Broady.



Shame that you guys can't watch her. cry.gif But it's to be expected because no one in Britain cares about Juniors.



You're right but she's only 2 months older than Mestach and Gavrilova, probably her two biggest rivals in the 1994 year. Nastja Kolar is also a good player born July 1994 but I don't see her being ranked in the top 40 in 6 months. She may be one of the oldest of the '94 girls but she's also the best (at least right now).



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Yes, no denying that she would have been the best even if they all were of the same age! But not by this much, I'm sure.

Jessica Ren can progress a lot but that'll take some time as she doesn't train full time. Can't complain about that as I have no right to...

__________________

  



Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 261
Date:

Greenleaf wrote:

Yes, no denying that she would have been the best even if they all were of the same age! But not by this much, I'm sure.

Jessica Ren can progress a lot but that'll take some time as she doesn't train full time. Can't complain about that as I have no right to...



True, but can't take away from the fact that she's the youngest girl in the top 100.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Nope!

__________________

  



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Good to see Windley, a qualier, beat Vandeweghe. I love it when these overrated (albeit mega talented) foreigners like her and Boluda who get wild cards in Britain are thumped (not that Coco was thumped). clap.gif Should teach the AELTC a lesson about how much tennis they know.


Second round :

Marcus Willis [24] vs. Hiroyasu Ehara [81] of Japan
Daniel Evans [49] vs. Guillaume Rufin [15] of France
Niall Angus [61] vs. Grigor Dimitrov [13] of Bulgaria
Daniel Smethurst [41] vs. Bradley Klahn [17] of the USA
Daniel Cox [58] vs. Andrew Thomas [39] of Australia

Laura Robson [36] vs. Melanie Oudin [2] of the USA
Johanna Konta [11] vs. Jade Windley [568]
Naomi Broady [740] vs. Zarina Diyas [42] of Kazakhstan


-- Edited by Greenleaf at 06:30, 2008-07-01

__________________

  



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Good luck, Laura. It'll be tough, but you never know!



Biased mini previews for the other matches (Laura's match is a repeat of the Roe final) -


Broady has a tricky match against Diyas, who is extremely impressive on fast surfaces. She's just 14 years old, but picked up the only Grade 1 that's played on Carpet, plus reached the final of Halle G2, which is played on grass, where she lost a close three setter to Mladenovic.

Konta should have enough for Windley, even though she had a great win over Coco. If she takes this, she may have some chance of being the first (I think) British girl to be ranked inside the top 10 under the new system.



Willis should beat Ehara comfortably given that he's badly, badly overranked. That said, he's in good form as he qualified and beat Devin Britton, who's a good grass player, in the first round.

Klahn is a fine player, but hardly unbeatable for Smethurst. Klan beat him in three sets at Eddie Herr, by the way.

I am assuming that this is the first time Coxy faces his nemesis of old since 2004? It could be a good match, this one, and I'll celebrate Dan losing as much as him winning as that'll probably mean that the LTA can't waste his time and their money by making him play USO.

Evo has a toughie against an in form Rufin who won Roehampton. The last sentence from Coxy's paragraph applies here, too.

It's a big ask for Angus against Grigor Dimitrov. Dimitrov is a rising star and a unique one at that since he possesses a one handed backhand! He already has a Futures title and warmed up for this with a wild card at Rosmalen (did okay there - four games off Andreev).

__________________

  



Admin: Moderator+Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 7255
Date:

I was at Wimbledon yesterday and managed to see a few of our juniors. I was impressed by what I saw.

First up it was Jade Windley. I didn't catch much of this match, it was more a case of glancing out the window every now and then as I ate lunch, however she looked more impressive than her opponent, and I had no clue that she'd had to qualify, so well done her!

Later in the day I glanced over at court 19 and (from quite some distance) declared "I think that might be Laura Robson" a quick check of the OOP (and a small wondering about how much of a tennis freak it makes me to be able to recognise our players from about 30 metres when I have quite poor eyesight) and I discovered it was indeed Laura. Great though my view of the court was (I was above it) I didn't have a view of any scoreboard so I had no idea about the scores, and I couldn't hear the umpire either. However, I watched anyway. I saw Laura lose serve a couple of games in (and get quite annoyed with herself, in a positive way I felt) and then come back out and immediately break back, resulting in a couple of fist pumps. Her serve was good, and penetrating (not sure on speed, I found it hard to judge) but it was erratic at times and she did throw in some wild mistakes. However this should be easily corrected with time, just as long as it is corrected. In terms of groundstrokes, they were good, again penetrating and she was constructing points and not simply hitting it back. She wasn't afraid to come into the net and so did so on a number of occasions. At this point I turned away for about 30 secs and when I glanced back the court was empty so I didn't know who won. However, I was pretty sure it would've been Robson and coming home found that that was the case.

Next up on that court was Dan Smethurst. By this time the doubles match on Court 14 was really engrossing (Benneteau/Mahut v Erlich/Ram 5 sets) and so I only glanced at Smethurst and my view was more obstructed. What I did see I was impressed with. Smethurst always looked in control when I was watching and his on court demenor seemed great, really positive and assured. I didn't see the end of the match (had to go back to centre for a certain Mr. M) but based on the body language I was pretty sure Dan was winning and I'm glad to see that was true.

__________________

To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty


Oscar Wilde



Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

Do we usually have this many juniors in the second round? I have only started following the juniors in the last year (thanks to this site, as I could never find anywhere to follow them before).

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Thanks for that, Bethan. smile.gif Especially for the description of La Robson's game.


No, Madeline, not normally. But we did have more than this last year - 7 boys and 3 girls.

__________________

  



Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2446
Date:

Marcus takes 1st set 6-4

Other Brits on today

Boys Singles
Marcus 1st on Court 14
Daniel Evans Second on court 6
Daniel Cox Third on court 7
Niall Second on court 14
Dan Smethurst Second on court 19

Girls Singles
Robson Second on court 7
Jade/Johanna Third on Court 14
Naomi third on Court 7





__________________
«First  <  14 5 6 7 817  >  Last»  | Page of 17  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard