Anyd proving himself to be a true Brit - indeed losing to a lower-ranked player when you were due to play Rafa in your next match and he's just gone out is up there with Tigger's loss at the AO when he was the top seed left a few years back.
john wrote:
He moonballs and moonballs away and when he tries to up the pace on a shot he almost certainly misses. The odd time he does hit and get back into the game he then goes back into negative mode and moonballs again.
I didn't see the match, but if that's what he was up to again, I have no sympathy for him whatsoever.
I can confirm that Hamburg is slower than Rome btw.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
I didn't see all of the match, just most of the second set, but I didn't see all that much moonballing. What was obvious to me was that Stan could hit the ball much harder.
I think most of the mooballing is done on the big points. On break points for and against and on big points in the tiebreak, you rarely see him attacking and hitting big shots. Hopefully this is merely a sign of a slight lack of confidence and a few big wins will see him get over it
__________________
Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive.... those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience
Wawrinka just beat JCF in straight sets. Watching him against Andy, he was playing at a fairly high standard and it was not surprising that he had too much for Murray. Right now Wawrinka could well be a top 10 clay player and Murray's lack of a decent forehand makes it very difficult to beat competent clay court players.
I think the big mistake Andy made was not following up his performance against Nadal at the Aus Open with more displays of a similar nature. By going back to his passive tennis, he has left himself in a position where he finds it difficult to playing attacking tennis when needed. His double-handed backhand is a great shot but it would be a lot more reliable if he used it in an aggressive fashion match after match.
Murray. Pro - He's British. Anti - He has the most obnoxious on-court presence of any top player. He seems to be incapable of losing a point without whinging, whining, muttering and swearing. (The BBC have got a serious problem looming for their Wimbledon coverage, because I think they can get fined for broadcasting swearing before 9PM - remember how they got into hot water when Rusedski let fly a few years ago). He's a scruffy so-&-so, and his body language is dreadful.
Wawrinka. Anti - He's not British. Pro - Everything else. Impeccable behaviour, and he seems like a thoroughly nice guy. Totally professional on court presence.
I'm going with the nice guys. Safin managed to get away with similar kind of behaviour without alienating the fans, because he came across as passionate rather than obnoxious.
__________________
"Where Ratty leads - the rest soon follow" (Professor Henry Brubaker - The Institute of Studies)