Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: ATP Indian Wells R4 - Murray v Davydenko
Who is up for the QFs ? [23 vote(s)]

Andy revolts in style to the Czar of Russia...wins in 2 !
34.8%
Andy the Bolshevik curbs the Cossack in 3 !
34.8%
The Donkey kicks ass...Davy in 2 !
17.4%
The Donkey makes a rear-end of Murray...Davy in 3 !
13.0%


Specialist Reporter + Intermediate Club Player

Status: Online
Posts: 2422
Date:
RE: ATP Indian Wells R4 - Murray v Davydenko


So victory for Andy Murray over Nikolay Davydenko 7-6 6-4 but in truth this was a match lost rather than won. The contest was packed full of errors, some forced by a change of pace, a high bouncing ball, or a shot landing deep to the baseline. But far too many were unforced, simply dumped in the net, pushed wide, or yards long under little or no pressure. Both players were guilty though Davydenko contributed far more than his fair share.

Murray chose to position himself deep behind the baseline, hoping to lure his opponent into the net. Davydenko pressed from just inside the court, venturing forward only when Murray was out of position. Despite an unorthodox volleying technique Nikolay won the vast majority of these points at the net. Yet winning the tactical battle was not enough to secure victory in a tightly fought contest desperately short of quality.

The early games hinted at what was to come. Murray produced an ace to go 30-0 then needless errors took the score to 30-40 at which point he double faulted to concede the first break. Davydenko found himself break point down in his first service game but continued to attack and was rewarded. His second was less impressive; a double fault and two horrible groundstrokes gifting Murray the break back.

Serving at 4-5 Davydenko started with a couple of ugly forehands then lost an incredible point as he first attacked the net only for Murray to lob, Davydenko came up with a high backhand smash, Murray another lob, Davydenko another smash, Murray a third lob that Nikolay proceeded to smash into the net. At 0-40 the set should have been Andy's but he chose to wait for the error rather than making anything happen himself; it never came.

By now the russian was in complete control of the points. A couple of blistering forehand winners took him to 30-40 on Murray's serve and Andy handed him the break with a forehand into the net. Attempting to serve out the set Davydenko's game collapsed; a double fault and two unforced errors taking it into a tiebreak.

Murray's first serve which had been patchy up to this point, came good in the tiebreak. An ace and two unreturned serves making the difference amongst yet more unforced errors from both players.

The second set began with another break of serve. A couple of impressive groundstrokes from Murray got him to 30-30 and errors from his opponent did the rest. The pattern of play was unchanged from the first set. Davydenko pressing, Murray looping high balls that Nikolay struggled to deal with, bouncing up above his shoulder.

An extraordinary spell in which Andy missed 14 first serves in a row yet somehow managed to hold serve. At 4-3 he faced break point but came up with a rare piece of aggression, firing a double-handed backhand crosscourt that Davydenko couldn't deal with. Serving for the match a series of challenges confused all. Davydenko won a challenge, Murray then won an ace on the replay again with a challenge, lost the next point despite a challenge, and would have won another ace had he had any challenges left to contest the call. Completely out of character with the rest of the match, Andy finished with an ace for a 7-6 6-4 victory.

So how did Murray win the match? Neither player played anywhere near their usual standard. Murray's first serve percentage was a shocking 42% while Davydenko's was low by his standard at 59%. The main difference was points won on 2nd serve: Andy 59%, Nikolay 43%. It was noticeable that Davydenko struggled trying to return Murray's kicked second serve and was unable to attack what is often a vulnerable aspect of Andy's game.

For all his talents, this was a match to forget for Andy. A handful of big first serves and a couple of heavy double-handed backhands and that was it. The rest was clever variations of pace and spin that a desperately poor Davydenko could not deal with. Andy got lucky, very lucky.


-- Edited by kundalini at 00:13, 2007-03-15

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 923
Date:

"For all his talents, this was a match to forget for Andy. A handful of big first serves and a couple of heavy double-handed backhands and that was it. The rest was clever variations of pace and spin that a desperately poor Davydenko could not deal with."

I totally disagree Kundalini - this is a match Andy should remember - a match against a top 4 player, Andy not at his best, especially on serve, but finding a way to come through pretty comfortably.

A number of points shown from the court side camera emphasised just how varied Andy's play was, and on a slow court against a top player who can hit winners at will against flat shots on either side, and will demolish almost every player in the world if he hits his rhythm, this was the ideal way to play.

Fair enough, he seemed to get a little tight or flat in the latter part of the match but on the whole a VERY impressive performance to come through

"Andy got lucky, very lucky."

Andy won 53% of the points in the match, had 8 break points to Davydenko's 3 and had a number of close calls go against him at vital stages of the match. So instead of Andy being lucky I would suggest that Davydenko was very lucky to be as close as he was.





__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6205
Date:

The article's up on www.britishtennis.net

__________________
btnet-narrow%20copy.gif


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 652
Date:

GC77 wrote:

"For all his talents, this was a match to forget for Andy. A handful of big first serves and a couple of heavy double-handed backhands and that was it. The rest was clever variations of pace and spin that a desperately poor Davydenko could not deal with."

I totally disagree Kundalini - this is a match Andy should remember - a match against a top 4 player, Andy not at his best, especially on serve, but finding a way to come through pretty comfortably.

A number of points shown from the court side camera emphasised just how varied Andy's play was, and on a slow court against a top player who can hit winners at will against flat shots on either side, and will demolish almost every player in the world if he hits his rhythm, this was the ideal way to play.

Fair enough, he seemed to get a little tight or flat in the latter part of the match but on the whole a VERY impressive performance to come through

"Andy got lucky, very lucky."

Andy won 53% of the points in the match, had 8 break points to Davydenko's 3 and had a number of close calls go against him at vital stages of the match. So instead of Andy being lucky I would suggest that Davydenko was very lucky to be as close as he was.






 Agree with you GC77 - I don't think Andy would ever write off a match like that because he didn't play well enough. He gutted it out and beat the world number 4. Sure he wasn't pretty doing it but he mixed his game up so much to force errors and sure, he's played better, but he played a smart match and deserved his win. I don't know if there was much luck to it.



__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 619
Date:

GC77 wrote:

"For all his talents, this was a match to forget for Andy. A handful of big first serves and a couple of heavy double-handed backhands and that was it. The rest was clever variations of pace and spin that a desperately poor Davydenko could not deal with."

I totally disagree Kundalini - this is a match Andy should remember - a match against a top 4 player, Andy not at his best, especially on serve, but finding a way to come through pretty comfortably.

A number of points shown from the court side camera emphasised just how varied Andy's play was, and on a slow court against a top player who can hit winners at will against flat shots on either side, and will demolish almost every player in the world if he hits his rhythm, this was the ideal way to play.

Fair enough, he seemed to get a little tight or flat in the latter part of the match but on the whole a VERY impressive performance to come through

"Andy got lucky, very lucky."

Andy won 53% of the points in the match, had 8 break points to Davydenko's 3 and had a number of close calls go against him at vital stages of the match. So instead of Andy being lucky I would suggest that Davydenko was very lucky to be as close as he was.






 I have to say that I agree - that write-up strikes me as a tad on the negative side.


He got a second consecutive straight sets win over this top 4 player in spite of serving not as well as he would like and struggling a little in the conditions - he said he found it slower and not as high bouncing as the outer courts.  He executed a strategy in spite of his own problems and repeated goaded Davydenko into error with a bewildering variation of shots designed to completely disrupt Daydenko's rhythm - and it worked.  Davydenko was also not at his best but his style of play is a handful for Andy - Andy did a great job of making it about how he wanted to play the match, which is what he needed to do.  On the occasions where Davydenko played the points his way, Murray was on the run, in trouble, and on the extreme defensive.

I think if you can play not your best match and still defeat the #4 in straights, you want to demand more from yourself, yes, but recognise your ability to grind out a tough win when you're not having it all your own way.  He should be critical, but constructively so - he's still in the tournament.  Davydenko is at the hotel packing.

__________________


Specialist Reporter + Intermediate Club Player

Status: Online
Posts: 2422
Date:

GC77 wrote:

"A number of points shown from the court side camera emphasised just how varied Andy's play was, and on a slow court against a top player who can hit winners at will against flat shots on either side, and will demolish almost every player in the world if he hits his rhythm, this was the ideal way to play.

Fair enough, he seemed to get a little tight or flat in the latter part of the match but on the whole a VERY impressive performance to come through

"Andy got lucky, very lucky."

Andy won 53% of the points in the match, had 8 break points to Davydenko's 3 and had a number of close calls go against him at vital stages of the match. So instead of Andy being lucky I would suggest that Davydenko was very lucky to be as close as he was.







I agree. Andy was a deserved winner. But if you read the context of my statement it was that Andy was lucky to face an opponent who played so poorly. If Davydenko played at that standard throughout the year he wouldn't be in the top 10. Would those same tactics have worked if Davydenko hadn't played a shocker of a match? When Andy unleashed his big groundstrokes he won the points yet he chose to defend for practically the whole match and yes it worked. But think back to the two matches won by Davydenko last year in which Andy won a set but got overwhelmed in most of the sets he lost. The pattern of play was the same. Davydenko forces the play, Murray defends deep, running side to side. Only difference was more moon balls this time around.



__________________


Admin: Moderator+Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 7255
Date:

The best possible news to come home to. Thank you very much to everyone who watched it and made comments it's always great to be able to read others opinions and especially so when I've not seen the match myself. Thank you.

Hopefully Andy can beat either Haas or Gonzalez, I think both will be tough prospects and he'll need to raise his level but we all know he can do that. I eagerly await to see whether he does or not.

__________________

To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty


Oscar Wilde



Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 619
Date:

Murray's strategy was essentially a defensive one to goad Davydenko into error.

That being so, it's hard to quantify how much of Davydenko's poorness was down to Murray's strategy working and getting under Davydenko's skin and mentally weakening him, and how much Davydenko was having a crap day at the office. And it's hard to say how Andy would have reacted had Davydenko handled it all better - would he have changed tacks or would he have stuck to this way of playing? Murray played what was in front of him today and beat it - he might well have got it done if Davydenko had played better too - we'll never know. Coulda woulda shoulda.

That being the case, i tend towards giving Murray a good deal of the credit - after all, Davydenko started brightly enough, and broke for 2-0 before his game started to unravel.

I think Murray will need to play better - he was helped to some degee by Kolya today. But a straight sets win over a #4 while not playing your best match - I'll take that, even if he wasn't playing his best match either.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

If Andy can beat a top 5 player without playing well, the last thing that we should feel is concern.

__________________

  



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12606
Date:

You beauty! What a result for Andy Murray! stuff the perfromance!

__________________
James Ward - Alex Ward - Kyle Edmund
«First  <  15 6 7 | Page of 7  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard