I think it's a really great idea ! we could do that or how about this site and the GRMB team up under the name of britishtennis.net to take on the might of andymurray.com to find out who has the best predictors. That's like this site and the GRMB teaming up and calling themselves the Andy Murray Message Board ... there's somehting fishy there!
ultimateshedman wrote:We could do this for Miami, say each site has 25 participants (this is just a randomly picked number, could be more or less). I think between the two boards - this and the rusedski one, we'd be able to raise 25 and obviously for andymurray.com they'd have to select their best 25.
Maybe scoring wise, the score for each site could be the accumulated score of each competing member.
Best left to Miami, yes - I'm yet to find out what teething problems my 'system' is going to experience this time, I'm sure there will be some. Because you can have average score per member, there's no real need to try and contrive to have the same number of players in both teams, though similar would be good.
ultimateshedman wrote:What do you think, it'd be fun to take them on !
By 'fun', you mean andymurray.com is full of people who know nothing about tennis and we'd beat them hands down, I assume?
-- Edited by steven at 18:26, 2007-03-09
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Haha well have you got a better idea for a combined name ? As Greg comes under british tennis too, I thought that we could all unite under britishtennis.net to take on am.com
Average score could be easier to do for the daily tables, I'll email Rob (am.com admin) and see what he thinks
Haha, no I think there are some knowledgeable posters on there, but I still fancy our chances of giving them a good duffing and it would be quite cool to do so !
I was getting a bit worried about PH Mathieu - he was a break down to Alberto Martin, the guy Andy nearly triple bagelled at the AO, and I think Martin was *4-3 up. Fortunately he choked it away and got broken twice to lose it 6-4. Phew!
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Right I'm about to post the first table, after the first 9 matches have been completed. I'll post the next update tomorrow morning, probably about 9am.
Small problem in that I tried to post the table and it told me the post was too long but I'm working on it....!
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
Got Mayer, Mathieu, Goldstein and Korolev winning which was right but got things wrong with Monfils, Grosjean, Pless and Monaco.
Amazed that Benneteau beat Monfils, Monfils missed 2 match points in that one. I shouldn't have picked Grosjean to beat Acasuso Keep forgetting how out of form Grosjean is, nothing like the player he was in 2003-2004, last few years have been steadily downhill for him and it was a routine 6-4, 6-4 win for Acasuso. Serra looked ordinary in Dubai while Pless was impressive against Fed but Serra won 7-6, 6-4 and Mahut surprisingly beat Monaco in a 3rd set breaker.
ultimateshedman wrote:Amazed that Benneteau beat Monfils, Monfils missed 2 match points in that one. I shouldn't have picked Grosjean to beat Acasuso Keep forgetting how out of form Grosjean is, nothing like the player he was in 2003-2004, last few years have been steadily downhill for him and it was a routine 6-4, 6-4 win for Acasuso.
Yeah those two mucked things up for me, I was sure Monfils was gonna take when he served for it so was pretty annoyed to see him lose. grr. Other than those two matches Mayer and Serra weren't supposed to win.
Congrats to Seagull by the way who had a 100% record for the first 6 matches.
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty