back to the journo, come on he is covering the end of year masters, henman has rounded on the journlists b4, the favt is roddick came closer to beating fed then he has in several years, and one ace could have changed everything.
maybe a question like you came very close to winning with s&v today, it must be encouragng etc.
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
got to say sorry for the A rod, he has played so well, and still bee knocked out, from that i have seen fed, blake, roddick and probably rafa deserve to go through,
so we now know that fed, blake, nably are in it, and i trhink the last s.lot will be between nadal/davy right? to be honets davy could take it. i hope the final is blake/nadal v federer.
edit: i got it wrong, if lubo bts fed then he goes through, so its a diffciult situation normally you have fed win it, but he might not try that hard, also payback for losing to nably last year? its unsporting, but it the fault of the flawed RR system.
-- Edited by Count Zero at 13:40, 2006-11-16
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
All these complications make me even MORE sure that I hate the idea of round robins next year! Imagine going through all these ifs, ands, or buts when Andy plays
Madeline wrote: All these complications make me even MORE sure that I hate the idea of round robins next year! Imagine going through all these ifs, ands, or buts when Andy plays
I agree, it seems really unfair to me that because someone needed three sets to beat an opponent, they are then excluded from the next round (thinking of Roddick here I admit) whereas someone who couldn't win the matches, but managed to take them to three sets does go through (Nalbandian). Ahh, it's all too confusing.
I hope they don't keep the round robin thing after trialing it next year. But you never know, according to the WTA the on-court coaching has been really popular with the fans and tv guys but I've only seen criticism of it so where are these 'fans'??
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
yeah round robin thing isn't good! don't think its great with 4 ppl in a group, so with 3 ppl think would be even worse!
consider these scenarios: Boggo, Fed and Nadal in a group:
Say, Boggo beats Fed, then Boggo beats Nadal, there's no point in Fed vs Nadal being played!
Alternatively, if Boggo beats Fed in 2 sets, then Fed beats Nadal in 3: then for Boggo vs Nadal: if nadal wins in straight sets he goes through, but if Nadal only wins in 3 sets then Boggo goes through! Means that once boggo has won a set, the players might as well go home! Furthermore, once Nadal wins a set vs Fed in the 2nd game, again the players might as well go home as Fed will have no chance of progressing, having lost to Boggo in 2!
consider these scenarios: Boggo, Fed and Nadal in a group:
Say, Boggo beats Fed, then Boggo beats Nadal, there's no point in Fed vs Nadal being played!
Alternatively, if Boggo beats Fed in 2 sets, then Fed beats Nadal in 3: then for Boggo vs Nadal: if nadal wins in straight sets he goes through, but if Nadal only wins in 3 sets then Boggo goes through! Means that once boggo has won a set, the players might as well go home! Furthermore, once Nadal wins a set vs Fed in the 2nd game, again the players might as well go home as Fed will have no chance of progressing, having lost to Boggo in 2!
That was the point I was trying to make, but you make it much clearer, thanks! Oh and I love the scenario being Fed, Boggo and Nadal, especially as in each of your outcomes it's Boggo who goes through!!
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
As confirmed on the Marray v Starace thread, nadal won 5-7 6-4 6-4 i think federer will win the semis, i still dont think we have seen the best of nadal yet and he still trying to get the confidence back.
nalby v blake - tough one to call, though i'll give nalby the edge. and we will have a rematch of nalby v fed masters no.4! (incl. last years masters cup matches!)
Robredo won. I'm by no means accusing Blake of tanking, but surely, having already qualified, he wouldn't be too bothered who won the match and may well have been making sure he didn't injure himself or tire himself ahead of tomorrow's semi.