Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Shewsbury challenger


Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1043
Date:
RE: Shewsbury challenger


Good luck Slabba!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Even though giving one to Evans ahead of one to Cox is a bit unfair, I always wanted to see Evans get one.

If nothing else, this will give him a ranking point which he can use for getting seeded at Futures qualies. And he took a set of Auckland on indoors, so he may upset Childs.

__________________

  



Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

I have updated the first post (entry list) with withdrawals etc., but steveg isn't completely up to date and I have a nasty feeling I have missed a withdrawal. . . in other words, that I have one too many players in the tournament. . .If you can spot the error, let me know!

__________________


Admin: Moderator+Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 7255
Date:

Madeline wrote:


I have updated the first post (entry list) with withdrawals etc., but steveg isn't completely up to date and I have a nasty feeling I have missed a withdrawal. . . in other words, that I have one too many players in the tournament. . .If you can spot the error, let me know!


As far as I can see the error is simply that you've made Adaktusson green instead of red, but have labelled him correctly as 'out'.

__________________

To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty


Oscar Wilde



administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 18307
Date:

Latest results:

Rd1 qualifying:

F Nielsen [Den][1] bt M Bains [GB][WC] 6-3, 7-6[4]

N Lalji [GB] bt C Crisp [GB] 6-4, 6-3

T Rushby [GB] bt A Parry [GB][WC] 6-0, 6-1

L Gregorc [Slo][5] bt F Sletting-Johnsen [Nor][WC] 6-1, 7-6[3]

A Juska [Lat][2] bt R Grambow [Ger] 7-6, 7-6

M Ryderstedt [Swe][3] bt R Irwin [GB] 6-1, 6-4

E Corrie [GB] bt S Dickson [GB][WC] 6-2, 6-1

N Bamford [GB] bt R Varga [Ukr] 6-2, 6-3

T Kamke [Ger][7] bt J May [GB] 6-4, 6-3

E Eleskovic [Swe] bt L Chramosta [Cze] 7-5, 6-7[5], 6-4

D Cox [GB] bt C Goode [GB][WC] 6-0, 6-0

R Searle [GB] bt R Connolly [GB] 7-5, 6-3

P Marx [Ger] bt E Allinson [GB] 7-6[4], 6-1



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Nice result for Dan.

A bigger test is up next.

__________________

  



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Doubles draw in pdf format.

No Auckland.

__________________

  



administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 18307
Date:

Rd2 [Brit matches]:

Only 1 result so far: S Bubka [Ukr][5] bt A Slabinsky [GB] 1-6, 6-3, 6-1



Needless to say, I'm gutted. Great first set for Slabba though against an opponent who beat a top 100 player in straights last week.

F Nielsen [Den][1] v N Lalji [GB]

L Gregorc [Slo][6] v T Rushby [GB]

M Ryderstedt [Swe][3] v E Corrie [GB]

T Kamke [Ger][7] v N Bamford [GB]

E Eleskovic [Swe] v R Searle [GB]

P Marx [Ger][8] v D Cox [GB]

Hopefully there'll be a few upsets otherwise there'll be no Brits in the final qualies round tomorrow. In rd1, 16 year old Maniel Bains did extremely well to give the top seed a close match, maybe Lalji can do the same.

Extremely impressive rd1 result for Ed Corrie. However, I think that Ryderstedt is likely to have too much power indoors with his serve-volley game.

Bamford broke the "foreigner bt Brit" monopoly in rd1 but I can't see him upsetting Kamke who has registered comfortable straight sets wins over Lee Childs and Jim May indoors recently.

I reckon that Rushby, Searle and Cox all have chances of upsets. Eleskovic reached the quarters in Sunderland last week but in rd1, Ross Hutchins had matchpoints against him before losing 8-6 in a 3rd set tiebreak. Hopefully he'll be a bit knackered after his marathon first round win over Chramosta. Marx did well in Britain earlier in the year but his form has tailed off recently.



__________________


administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 18307
Date:

Greenleaf wrote:

Doubles draw in pdf format.

No Auckland.




Slabba in the doubles

Grrrrr @ Bamford and May being in the same quarter again as Goodall and Hutchins. Hopefully Bamford and May will start making the step up to doing well in 25Ks next year after all the success they've had in 15Ks in the latter half of this year, they've completely dominated the British circuit like Fleming and Murray did in 2005.

I'm not surprised Auckland isn't in the doubles. I guess he'll be wanting to leave for Scotland on Friday and he's very likely to be involved in the doubles semis on that day and quite possibly the final given his recent form. I guess he reckons that he's unlikely to make the semis or further in singles. Hopefully Delgado can win this tournament and finish the year inside the top 100, is that mathematically possible, or does he have points to defend ?





__________________


Admin: Moderator+Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 7255
Date:

ultimateshedman wrote:


Hopefully Delgado can win this tournament and finish the year inside the top 100, is that mathematically possible, or does he have points to defend ?





Well. By my calculations:


With a 14th score of 1 this weeks single point from the Ukraine will make no difference to his points total. So Delgado is on 480 points. Winning in Shewbusy would mean +50, -1 for the 14th score giving a new total of 529.


Currently no 100 is 525 points, 99 535. So, provided that doesn't change tomorrow when the new rankings come out, mathematically Delgado could reach the top 100 but that depends on what the others between him and that magic number do.


I'll check again tomorrow and let you know if that changes.



__________________

To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty


Oscar Wilde



Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1043
Date:

ultimateshedman wrote:


Rd2 [Brit matches]:

Only 1 result so far: S Bubka [Ukr][5] bt A Slabinsky [GB] 1-6, 6-3, 6-1






Disappointing for Slabba, looks like a great first set but taken to the cleaners a bit in the third.

__________________


administrator

Status: Offline
Posts: 18307
Date:

We have no Brits in the final qualifying round Bamford and Slabba came closest

Rd2 qualies results:

F Nielsen [Den][1] bt N Lalji [GB] 6-2, 6-2

L Gregorc [Slo][6] bt T Rushby [GB] 6-4, 6-4

M Ryderstedt [Swe][3] bt E Corrie [GB] 6-4, 6-0

T Kamke [Ger][7] bt N Bamford [GB] 5-7, 6-3, 6-2

E Eleskovic [Swe] bt R Searle [GB] 6-3, 7-6[3]

P Marx [Ger][8] bt D Cox [GB] 7-6[2], 6-7[8], 6-2


__________________


Admin:Moderator + All Time Great + britishtennis.net correspondant

Status: Offline
Posts: 11280
Date:

ultimateshedman wrote:


We have no Brits in the final qualifying round Bamford and Slabba came closest

Rd2 qualies results:

F Nielsen [Den][1] bt N Lalji [GB] 6-2, 6-2

L Gregorc [Slo][6] bt T Rushby [GB] 6-4, 6-4

M Ryderstedt [Swe][3] bt E Corrie [GB] 6-4, 6-0

T Kamke [Ger][7] bt N Bamford [GB] 5-7, 6-3, 6-2

E Eleskovic [Swe] bt R Searle [GB] 6-3, 7-6[3]

P Marx [Ger][8] bt D Cox [GB] 7-6[2], 6-7[8], 6-2




P Marx [Ger][8] bt D Cox [GB] 7-6[2], 6-7[8], 6-2

Really great effort by Dan.....Marx is not mug and Dan is going to be top 100 in the next few years !!!!!

__________________

BTnet logo

mjd


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2144
Date:


ultimateshedman wrote:



We have no Brits in the final qualifying round Bamford and Slabba came closest

Rd2 qualies results:

F Nielsen [Den][1] bt N Lalji [GB] 6-2, 6-2

L Gregorc [Slo][6] bt T Rushby [GB] 6-4, 6-4

M Ryderstedt [Swe][3] bt E Corrie [GB] 6-4, 6-0

T Kamke [Ger][7] bt N Bamford [GB] 5-7, 6-3, 6-2

E Eleskovic [Swe] bt R Searle [GB] 6-3, 7-6[3]

P Marx [Ger][8] bt D Cox [GB] 7-6[2], 6-7[8], 6-2




I would have said that Cox (7-6[2], 6-7[8], 6-2) came much closer than those two
In fact it was a great effort!


 



__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1706
Date:

that second set tiebreaker must have knocked dan's confidence as it is likely he faced a match point possibly 2. never mind, he getting the experience and that all we can ask for another thing since hes not playing here and eddie herr does that mean hes taking 2 weeks off before the orange bowl?

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6 722  >  Last»  | Page of 22  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard