NO cheating (UBF) NO match-fixing (Eblunt) NO more loan-sharking (Mkkreuk)...unless its for me !
New Rule. If Bankrupt twice (Andymonium) then the second time you can get 20 AMS but this is a loan....once you get to 100AMs it will be taken off. Also you can also only bet 50% of your total until you get past 100AMs.
Gamblers anonymous phone numer for Andymonium 1-800-CANNYBET
Bangkok
1.33 Murray v Henman 3.00 1.72 Udomchoke v Bastl 2.00 1.36 HT Lee v Schuettler 2.87 1.10 Blake v Cilic 6.00 1.12 Nieminen v Massa 5.50 1.16 Safin v Kevin Kim 4.50 1.66 Srichaphan v F Lopez 2.10
Mumbai
1.03 Tursonov v A Wagh 10.00 1.57 Rik De Voest v N Devilder 2.25 1.10 Berdych v L Kubot 6.00 1.16 Robredo v A Peya 4.50
Drew, Henman should be at 3.00, which I personally think represents more value than Murray at 1.33. Regardless, I still think Murray is more likely to win, so I'm going to make an accumulator bet on Murray (1.33) and HK Lee (1.36). Whilst I'm also tempted to throw in Udomchoke at 1.72 and Srichaphan at 1.66 the fact I'm going all in with my 332AM's, it's a bit too risky (as if it's not risky enough!)
So, to clarrify:-
332 on Murray (1.33) and HK Lee (1.36) for 268.52 profit.
No, actually I'll take a chance,
332 on Murray (1.33), HK Lee (1.36), Udomchoke (1.72) and Srichaphan (1.66) for 1382.61 profit.
Oh, and finally, if I'm back to my senses before any of the above matches start, would I be able to alter/cancel the bet?
Andymonium wrote: what i go bankrupt again ..ig uess its just 40 ams i have to payback
20 on safin..hopefully i dont have to find out
New Rule. If Bankrupt twice (Andymonium) then the second time you can get 20 AMS but this is a loan....once you get to 100AMs it will be taken off. Also you can also only bet 50% of your total until you get past 100AMs.
So Stew is the next competitor off to GA having managed to lose 332 AM in one day. Michael might be in need of some more counselling aswell after losing half his AM
I know it's easy to say this retrospectively, but if I was making individual bets with real money (or even individual bets with AM's), and I was basing my bets on pure value, I would have bet on Henman and Schuettler, as I felt their odds represented better value, although, I was being 'ballsy' and I believed Murray and Lee were more likely to win their matches, which the lower odds represented. I see that Srichaphan and Udomchoke managed to get through their opening matches okay, I should have obviously put all my AM's on them, although, I was going to wait until after the early matches had finished, and then bet the profit on a Srichaphan, Udomchoke accumulator
