murrays main man wrote: king is a former no1 in juniors ( 99-OO ) and won the us beating blake and ginepri along the way....so maybe he is a late developer
murrays main man wrote: king is a former no1 in juniors ( 99-OO ) and won the us beating blake and ginepri along the way....so maybe he is a late developer
maybe, but I don't want him to develop against Tim, late or otherwise.
1-1, and Tim is 30-0 up on his serve, make that 40-0
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
murrays main man wrote: king is a former no1 in juniors ( 99-OO ) and won the us beating blake and ginepri along the way....so maybe he is a late developer
That explains why he's proving trickier than expected, I thought the scoreline would be something like 2 and 2 to Tim.
murrays main man wrote: king is a former no1 in juniors ( 99-OO ) and won the us beating blake and ginepri along the way....so maybe he is a late developer
That explains why he's proving trickier than expected, I thought the scoreline would be something like 2 and 2 to Tim. Henman holds to lead 2-1
same here....but even still you would expect tim to be able to handle him more comfortably given his recent form (the way he has been playing rather than the results...)