(except that in the ATP rankings Murray will be behind Djokovic if they end on the same points, so technically he's at 46.)
hmmmm.... I think I'm going to have to get the ATP to change their ranking system to work on alphabetical order of first names. It's going to be easier than building a spreadsheet with all the scores of the 13 compulsory tournaments it.
Two competitors on court at the moment. C Rochus is a break down in the first set but keep the pins in, it's a five setter after all. Martin on the other hand is a set up, 63. give the pins a tweak for him please.
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
RobC wrote: imoen wrote: (except that in the ATP rankings Murray will be behind Djokovic if they end on the same points, so technically he's at 46.) hmmmm.... I think I'm going to have to get the ATP to change their ranking system to work on alphabetical order of first names. It's going to be easier than building a spreadsheet with all the scores of the 13 compulsory tournaments it.
Rob, when players have the same score, all you have to do is look those players up on tennisfacts.com or the ATP breakdown.
The thought of complicating my spreadsheet even further fills me with horror. . .
Rob, when players have the same score, all you have to do is look those players up on tennisfacts.com or the ATP breakdown. The thought of complicating my spreadsheet even further fills me with horror. . .
I suppose you're right. It's hard enough transcribing the spreadsheet correctly, without having to look out for that, thoug........maybe I can add a fraction of a point to those to whom it applies, so that the sort function picks it up automatically. In the meantime, it's high time for young Novak to lose his match to make the issue moot!