R1:- Naiktha Bains (GBR) WR376 [Q6] def Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva (AND) WR169 [8] 5-2 retired
Coup Droit wrote:With an LL spot for Sofia, and a win by retirement for Naitha, we're getting the rub of the green in Portugal
With an LL spot for Sofia, and a win by retirement for Naitha, we're getting the rub of the green in Portugal
Most definitely - the draws look good
L16:- Katie Swan (GBR) WR208 [9] v Valentina Steiner (GER) WR399 [Q8]L16:- Naiktha Bains (GBR) WR376 [Q6] v Reese Brantmeir (USA) WR385 [Q7]
the addict wrote:Coup Droit wrote:With an LL spot for Sofia, and a win by retirement for Naitha, we're getting the rub of the green in Portugal Most definitely - the draws look goodL16:- Katie Swan (GBR) WR208 [9] v Valentina Steiner (GER) WR399 [Q8]L16:- Naiktha Bains (GBR) WR376 v Reece Brantmeer (USA) WR385 [Q7]
L16:- Katie Swan (GBR) WR208 [9] v Valentina Steiner (GER) WR399 [Q8]L16:- Naiktha Bains (GBR) WR376 v Reece Brantmeer (USA) WR385 [Q7]
She's Reese Brantmeier, just for the purists - and that's a challenge, given her college record (see previous)
But still definitely good for R2 of a 125
the addict wrote:Coup Droit wrote:With an LL spot for Sofia, and a win by retirement for Naitha, we're getting the rub of the green in Portugal Most definitely - the draws look goodL16:- Katie Swan (GBR) WR208 [9] v Valentina Steiner (GER) WR399 [Q8]L16:- Naiktha Bains (GBR) WR376 [Q6] v Reece Brantmeer (USA) WR385 [Q7]
L16:- Katie Swan (GBR) WR208 [9] v Valentina Steiner (GER) WR399 [Q8]L16:- Naiktha Bains (GBR) WR376 [Q6] v Reece Brantmeer (USA) WR385 [Q7]
Added Q6 to Nakitha to make a qualifier vs qualifier L16 tie.
It's Brantmeier
https://gbtennisdata.github.io/
Lambda_ wrote:It's Brantmeier
Yes, that's what I wrote
And 'Reese'
The points from here so far will take 28 yo Naiktha to her highest ranking since 2023, live ranked 344. Her CH is 199 from 2020.
Spelling mistakes corrected
seagull wrote:Do we really need to point out spelling mistakes? Makes little to no difference
Do we really need to point out spelling mistakes? Makes little to no difference
In general, no; but in names it is helpful so that we the public get to know the correct spelling (which is not always obvious).
Corrections are good - it's the discussion afterwards that is not usually neccesary