British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 34 - US Open MIXED DOUBLES ONLY - New York, Hard.


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 54637
Date:
RE: Week 34 - US Open MIXED DOUBLES ONLY - New York, Hard.


SuperT wrote:

Just found the end of Henry's match on a dodgy stream and they thrashed Djoko and Sabalenca in the MTB. Fantastic result. I haven't seen her before but Siniakova was brilliant.


 Best doubles player in the womens game for sure- great result for Henry and Siniakova - well done ! 



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2056
Date:

JonH wrote:
SuperT wrote:

Just found the end of Henry's match on a dodgy stream and they thrashed Djoko and Sabalenca in the MTB. Fantastic result. I haven't seen her before but Siniakova was brilliant.


 Best doubles player in the womens game for sure- great result for Henry and Siniakova - well done ! 


 She served an ace to Djokovic!!!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 70730
Date:

QF:  (WC) Elina Svitolina & Gaël Monfils (UKR/FRA) UNR defeated (Q) Katerina Siniakova (CZE) & Henry Patten CR 2 (1+1) by 5-4(6) 4-5(3) [10-8]  bleh



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 45742
Date:

Routliffe & Glasspool 3-5 *0-3 

7 games in a row for S Williams & Alcaraz



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 45742
Date:

L16:  (WC) Serena Williams & Carlos Alcaraz (USA/ESP) UNR (570+0) beat (Q) Erin Routliffe (NZL) & Lloyd Glasspool CR 24 (11+13) by 5-3 4-1 

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 45742
Date:

A deafening silence as our guys+ get beaten. Indeed all fall down re the potential all 'proper' doubles players SFs I pointed to earlier.

Seemed apparent not what most of us wanted at all, with an element of show up these singles players combining to make up star name scratch doubles pairs ( the doubles players were scratch pairs too of course but were still very significant and hopefully adaptable doubles players ). And tbf I reckon some folk would have been all over this thread if results had been rather different. But not to be.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 54637
Date:

indiana wrote:

A deafening silence as our guys+ get beaten. Indeed all fall down re the potential all 'proper' doubles players SFs I pointed to earlier.

Seemed apparent not what most of us wanted at all, with an element of show up these singles players combining to make up star name scratch doubles pairs ( the doubles players were scratch pairs too of course but were still very significant and hopefully adaptable doubles players ). And tbf I reckon some folk would have been all over this thread if results had been rather different. But not to be.


 Probably true although, for me, I wasnt around last night and so didnt really pay much attention to the tennis as I was at the Edinburgh Festival. It was hard to know what to write, other than disappointing so didnt bother!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 45742
Date:

Ah, the Edinburgh Festival. Less than a week to go and we get our city back 

The walk from Newington into Princes Street along South Bridge is quite busy, a glance up the Royal Mile and that's silly busy.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 54637
Date:

indiana wrote:

Ah, the Edinburgh Festival. Less than a week to go and we get our city back 

The walk from Newington into Princes Street along South Bridge is quite busy, a glance up the Royal Mile and that's silly busy.


 Indeed, it was heaving. We went to an event at the McEwen Hall, so not far from Newington really, a walk anyway, but all over it was silly busy! We are staying up at George Street area (daughter works at the Kimpton Hotel in the Baba Restaurant there so gets a v nice room discount that we take advantage of at IHG hotels!) and it was still buzzing at past midnight - Ubers very hard to find! 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 54637
Date:

Im guessing the bridge we walked over was South Bridge in fact!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 45742
Date:

JonH wrote:

Im guessing the bridge we walked over was South Bridge in fact!


The big bridge over the railway, from Princes Street up towards High Street / Royal Mile is North Bridge. South Bridge is the very much smaller ( and less noticeable, seemingly just part of the street ) historic bridge / street the other side of High Street, over the Cowgate, bridging the valley between High Street and Newington etc beyond. Google North Bridge and South Bridge images.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 54637
Date:

Pretty sure it was - balmoral hotel was at the bottom of it opposite the new St James arcade place? And a Hilton hotel at the top end

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 45742
Date:

JonH wrote:

Pretty sure it was - balmoral hotel was at the bottom of it opposite the new St James arcade place? And a Hilton hotel at the top end


 Yes, that's North Bridge.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 54637
Date:

indiana wrote:
JonH wrote:

Pretty sure it was - balmoral hotel was at the bottom of it opposite the new St James arcade place? And a Hilton hotel at the top end


 Yes, that's North Bridge.


 Ah, makes sense - its North of the other one! Still v busy ! 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 45742
Date:

Come back tomorrow folk for discussion about the 3 Forth Bridges. Much more interesting than the silly US Open Mixed Doubles 



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard