Lois Boisson has direct entry for this years Wimbledon and her ranking is now down to below 150 and whilst Chawlinska is not qualified for this year's Wimbledon she has enough ranking points for Wimbledon 2027. Boissons French success in 2025 contributed to direct entry for Wimbledob 2026.
The AELTC has just announced the prize money for this year's championships. The total increase is 20% over the 2025. In relation to this thread, qualifying is now £20k for the first round, £32k for QR2 and £50k for the FQR. In the main draw first round losers will get £80k
Just compared this to the other 3 slams to see where it sits in comparison. Figures are the % that Wimbledon is above or below that round for prize money compared to the other slam. I have taken the prize money as it was at the last tournament but have used todays exchange rate according to xe.com. Probably not 100% accurate but a rough illustration of where the new prize money sits.
I suspect with her age, sponsorship and relationship with Serena spending another week or two in the UK for relatively little money would be pretty short sighted. Much better to go and get yourself sorted physically and take a mental break.
And the idea that a system is set up to encourage players to leave any withdrawal late in order to receive half their prizemoney feels a poor system.
I guess the system is designed to stop players actually stepping on court and then withdrawing, given the large prizemoney available. Maybe they should set it up so that any initial direct acceptance into a slam gets guaranteed payment of round one money, plus maybe a short back up list of a few players just outside. This would almost be like a retainer and they get it paid regardless. As a retainer, if they then play and lose, they don't receive extra money, but if they get to round 2 or beyond then they will receive round 2 money etc.
If we treat it like a retainer and it is guaranteed, there is no incentive to leave withdraw late other than seeing if it clears up. And players withdrawing early like Mboko has done would be normal and better for everyone concerned.
Obviously those coming in to the field as alts would need to get paid full first round prizemoney, I can't recall if a replacement for a late withdrawal currently gets full money or the other 50%, but they should get full money, IMO.
The AELTC has just announced the prize money for this year's championships. The total increase is 20% over the 2025. In relation to this thread, qualifying is now £20k for the first round, £32k for QR2 and £50k for the FQR. In the main draw first round losers will get £80k
Just compared this to the other 3 slams to see where it sits in comparison. Figures are the % that Wimbledon is above or below that round for prize money compared to the other slam. I have taken the prize money as it was at the last tournament but have used todays exchange rate according to xe.com. Probably not 100% accurate but a rough illustration of where the new prize money sits.
Wimbledon 2026
French
Australian
US Open(2025)
Q1
20000
-3.10
-5.03
-1.72
Q2
32000
12.76
7.96
3.45
Q3
50000
21.12
15.15
18.13
R1
80000
6.92
2.56
-1.72
R2
126000
12.70
7.69
10.57
R3
185000
15.04
8.55
5.49
R4
300000
22.40
20.19
1.35
QF
480000
18.75
23.08
-1.72
SF
900000
39.53
38.46
-3.47
F
1800000
49.50
61.00
-2.70
W
3600000
49.50
66.82
-2.70
So frustrating that they keep upping the winning pot - the ones who really need the extra boost are the ones in quallies / first round. Add 10-20k per round from Q1 and deduct that total from the QF - Winner pots.
Additionally, the surplus that the AELTC retain is largely passed on to the LTA, and far too little, but still some, of these funds are used to help players at even lower levels, and juniors.
What happens if the wildcards get announced, Fran gets one but then someone withdraws from main draw and that all happens before qualifying starts? Do they get to give someone else the wildcard?
What happens if the wildcards get announced, Fran gets one but then someone withdraws from main draw and that all happens before qualifying starts? Do they get to give someone else the wildcard?
Yes. Fran would move into the main draw and her wildcard would be available for reallocation. If it was decided not to reallocate it, then the next alternate for the main draw would just move in.
Obscene amounts of cash for reaching the QF's and beyond, and these are players who are either already earning, or will recoup, a packet through endorsements / sponsorships for getting so far in a Slam.
Money is the root of all evil is the saying, and professional tennis for the elite seems to be a real money spinner. It's hardly surprising that so few take so much out of the game, when the rest have to endure a punishing and expensive schedule of global travel in the pursuit of points in a ranking system that rewards the already established stars and limits player turnover for the benefit of TV audience.
Obscene amounts of cash for reaching the QF's and beyond, and these are players who are either already earning, or will recoup, a packet through endorsements / sponsorships for getting so far in a Slam.
Money is thEe root of all evil is the saying, and professional tennis for the elite seems to be a real money spinner. It's hardly surprising that so few take so much out of the game, when the rest have to endure a punishing and expensive schedule of global travel in the pursuit of points in a ranking system that rewards the already established stars and limits player turnover for the benefit of TV audience.
Excuse me for correcting you, but the full quote, from the Bible, is the "love of money is the root of all evil"