British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Race for the Wimbledon wildcards 2026


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 125
Date:
Race for the Wimbledon wildcards 2026


I think the post has been deleted now. I cannot see it anyway.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 53497
Date:

Var wrote:
JonH wrote:
Var wrote:
JonH wrote:
Var wrote:

Dan posted on Insta as expected. Post about giving up Washington tournament to play doubles at Olympics for GB with Andy. My worry from this is I saw some terrible comments about one of the Brits that got a wildcard MD, I hope the trolls dont take it out on them. Despicable.


 Thanks Var - I dont have an insta account (dont do social media - Id be ok if I was under 16!) Im afraid and cant get to the comments. Any chance you are able to copy and paste what he says into a post here? Thanks if you can! 


 


 Hi Var - not sure it copied across sadly, but thanks anyway! 


 Sorry.


 No worries!!



__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 639
Date:

Blue_Belle wrote:
Danny1312 wrote:

It is a shame they've had to give some non Brit ones! We will have quite a few in Qualifying who have previously won MD matches... And likes of Ali G who have but can't even get through the pre Qualies! Some missing out all together who if got nice draws you wouldn't put it past them! Sad in a way but shows good depth!


 No, I don't see a problem giving a qWC to the junior champ if they need it. 


 I don't just a shame really, was on those group of players to get high enough ranked and they didn't :)



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 45072
Date:

OK, I've woken up this morning as mad as ever about in particular Billy not getting a MD WC.

As I've said I would have given one to Dan too but I understand some arguments against one for him. What I just don't get at all is Billy not getting one, given his ranking around other GB WCs and well ahead of Felix and Harry ( and yes, of course no-one should be taking it out on these 2 fine progressing players ). FWIW Billy is live GB # 4.

I have read no-one here even try to justify Billy's exclusion and the spuculation seems just to be about age ( I took it CD had tongue firmly in cheek when mentioning age and '"northern" ).

This ( my gawd ) 31 yo is clearly a relatively late bloomer with a climb through the rankings and history on the road that should serve as an inspiration to many out on say the ITF circuit that you can make it, never too old - cough.. Given a MD WC last year ( and it's not as if he had been stacking up Wimbledon MD WCs ) he did win a MD match.

Sorry, to my mind I can say no other than I think that Billy's exclusion is a disgrace.



__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 639
Date:

indiana wrote:

OK, I've woken up this morning as mad as ever about in particular Billy not getting a MD WC.

As I've said I would have given one to Dan too but I understand some arguments against one for him. What I just don't get at all is Billy not getting one, given his ranking around other GB WCs and well ahead of Felix and Harry ( and yes, of course no-one should be taking it out on these 2 fine progressing players ). FWIW Billy is live GB # 4.

I have read no-one here even try to justify Billy's exclusion and the spuculation seems just to be about age ( I took it CD had tongue firmly in cheek when mentioning age and '"northern" ).

This ( my gawd ) 31 yo is clearly a relatively late bloomer with a climb through the rankings and history on the road that should serve as an inspiration to many out on say the ITF circuit that you can make it, never too old - cough.. Given a MD WC last year ( and it's not as if he had been stacking up Wimbledon MD WCs ) he did win a MD match.

Sorry, to my mind I can say no other than I think that Billy's exclusion is a disgrace.


Agreed fully and memory might serve me wrong but I thought Billy made it just about as of his own rights last year? Wildcard 2024 though I think. in my opinion he should've got one!  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 53497
Date:

indiana wrote:

OK, I've woken up this morning as mad as ever about in particular Billy not getting a MD WC.

As I've said I would have given one to Dan too but I understand some arguments against one for him. What I just don't get at all is Billy not getting one, given his ranking around other GB WCs and well ahead of Felix and Harry ( and yes, of course no-one should be taking it out on these 2 fine progressing players ). FWIW Billy is live GB # 4.

I have read no-one here even try to justify Billy's exclusion and the spuculation seems just to be about age ( I took it CD had tongue firmly in cheek when mentioning age and '"northern" ).

This ( my gawd ) 31 yo is clearly a relatively late bloomer with a climb through the rankings and history on the road that should serve as an inspiration to many out on say the ITF circuit that you can make it, never too old - cough.. Given a MD WC last year ( and it's not as if he had been stacking up Wimbledon MD WCs ) he did win a MD match.

Sorry, to my mind I can say no other than I think that Billy's exclusion is a disgrace.


 Definitely with you on this, Indy. It makes no sense for all those reasons and others. Best Billy can do now is show them in qualies next week (someone said he would be seeded?) and get a place in that field. He should be able to do it, I think, obviously depends on draw. 

As an aside, I see Stan W has withdrawn from Mallorca for personal reasons. I don't know whether that puts Wimbledon in doubt at all - watch this space as to whether that wildcard comes free over the weekend?

Does anyone know, at what point does a wildcard withdrawal go back to another wildcard replacement or revert to the next alt in line? If Stan withdraws and does so after the qualies draw is made, could one of the Brits still get a wildcard (or Monfils as another name) at that point (eg Billy or Dan?)



__________________
Var


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2260
Date:

Var wrote:
indiana wrote:

OK, I've woken up this morning as mad as ever about in particular Billy not getting a MD WC.

As I've said I would have given one to Dan too but I understand some arguments against one for him. What I just don't get at all is Billy not getting one, given his ranking around other GB WCs and well ahead of Felix and Harry ( and yes, of course no-one should be taking it out on these 2 fine progressing players ). FWIW Billy is live GB # 4.

I have read no-one here even try to justify Billy's exclusion and the spuculation seems just to be about age ( I took it CD had tongue firmly in cheek when mentioning age and '"northern" ).

This ( my gawd ) 31 yo is clearly a relatively late bloomer with a climb through the rankings and history on the road that should serve as an inspiration to many out on say the ITF circuit that you can make it, never too old - cough.. Given a MD WC last year ( and it's not as if he had been stacking up Wimbledon MD WCs ) he did win a MD match.

Sorry, to my mind I can say no other than I think that Billy's exclusion is a disgrace



-- Edited by Var on Friday 19th of June 2026 09:57:00 AM


 It is a disgrace about Billy as well. It shows how far away the elitists are from the rank and file tennis supporters. 



__________________
VRoberts


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 53497
Date:

PS Billy is from Nottingham, right?

I guess for CD, that is a Northerner!! Evo is Birmingham, so ditto?! Liam is Manc - so v ditto to CD!

For me, I will count Liam as a fellow Northerner (wrong side of the Pennines though) but no one is ever going to let me count Billy or Evo a Northerners - confirmed Midlanders, IMO!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 69189
Date:

JonH wrote:

PS Billy is from Nottingham, right?

I guess for CD, that is a Northerner!! Evo is Birmingham, so ditto?! Liam is Manc - so v ditto to CD!

For me, I will count Liam as a fellow Northerner (wrong side of the Pennines though) but no one is ever going to let me count Billy or Evo a Northerners - confirmed Midlanders, IMO!


He was born in Nottingham & supports the Tricky Trees, but I think he regards himself as a proud Manxman - from his ATP bio: 

  • Began playing tennis aged five in the Isle of Man at Castle Town Tennis Club with his dad most nights after school.

  • First coach was Ian Watson at Albany Tennis Club. Watson helped him until age 12 alongside Harris father.

  • Moved to Bisham Abbey in England for two years to train with the best players his age before returning to the Isle of Man to finish his GCSEs.


__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 53497
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
JonH wrote:

PS Billy is from Nottingham, right?

I guess for CD, that is a Northerner!! Evo is Birmingham, so ditto?! Liam is Manc - so v ditto to CD!

For me, I will count Liam as a fellow Northerner (wrong side of the Pennines though) but no one is ever going to let me count Billy or Evo a Northerners - confirmed Midlanders, IMO!


He was born in Nottingham & supports the Tricky Trees, but I think he regards himself as a proud Manxman - from his ATP bio: 

  • Began playing tennis aged five in the Isle of Man at Castle Town Tennis Club with his dad most nights after school.

  • First coach was Ian Watson at Albany Tennis Club. Watson helped him until age 12 alongside Harris father.

  • Moved to Bisham Abbey in England for two years to train with the best players his age before returning to the Isle of Man to finish his GCSEs.

 That's right, forgot the Isle of Man bit - mmm, not sure I would count Manxmen as Northerners, maybe honorary Northerners! Definitely not Southerners!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 61379
Date:

I did give the English blazers bods' definition of northern being anyone north of Watford

That was the key thing

And so, yes, they're all northern, no question

(My definition isn't much different though )

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 53497
Date:

www.wimbledon.com/pdf/update/referees/2026/QS_Entries.pdf

Looking at the entry list, Jay would be next in with one more withdrawal, even though he is there with a wild card - so he wouldnt need his wildcard and then there would be 4 going free.

So all 4 could get one?

Have I got that correct re Jay?

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3955
Date:

JonH wrote:

www.wimbledon.com/pdf/update/referees/2026/QS_Entries.pdf


Blimey. The men are dropping like flies.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 45072
Date:

So, as we stand ( finally unless maybe if say Stan drops out in the next couple of days ) we have from the Brits, with Jay a Q DE and all 4 play-off semi finalists receiving Q WCs :

9 MD entries ( 3 DEs + 6 WCs )
13 Q entries ( 5 DEs + 8 WCs )

20 of our top 25 ranked on Monday will have made Wimbledon MD or Q. The other 5 are the 4 seeds from the play-offs ( Alastair, Charles, Giles, and Hamish ) who all didn't make it and will now all be in Eastbourne Q, plus George L, presumaly injured. The other 2 with Q WCs are Mark Ceban and Oliver Bonding.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11924
Date:

Incredible how the mens qualies field has dropped so low compared to the womens

__________________
«First  <  117 18 19 20  >  Last»  | Page of 20  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard