Thought this would be an interesting thread to start. I've been following British tennis since 1998 and in that near 30 year timeframe, it feels like this is the most strength in depth we've ever had, at least on the men's side. 18 players in the top 300, and if two of Paul/Max/Giles has a good week in the next few weeks, that is likely to become 20, which is unprecedented.
With tickets for the grass-court summer already on sale, what this also means is that competition for the summer's wildcards is going to be more intense than ever (especially given their importance for funding the rest of the season for many of these players). While the WC choices have usually been previous obvious and easy for the LTA to make, some tough decisions will need to be taken, and it's going to be fascinating to watch it unfold.
This is how things currently stand in the live rankings as of March 1:
1. WR 14: Jack Draper
2. WR 29: Cam Norrie
3. WR 87: Jake Fearnley
4. WR 121: Jan Choinski
5. WR 134: Jack Pinnington Jones
6. WR 150: Billy Harris
7. WR 173: Arthur Fery
8. WR 184: Jay Clarke
9. WR 196: Oli Crawford
10. WR 202: Dan Evans
11. WR 208: George Loffhagen
12. WR 242: Ryan Peniston
13. WR 243: Toby Samuel
14. WR 248: Johannus Monday
15. WR 252: Felix Gill
16. WR 260: Charles Broom
17. WR 277: Harry Wendelken
18. WR 283: Liam Broady
19. WR 310: Paul Jubb
20. WR 311: Max Basing
21. WR 327: Oli Tarvet
22. WR 337: Giles Hussey
23. WR 362: Ali Gray
24. WR 374: Hamish Stewart
25. WR 393: Lui Maxted
-- Edited by Sheddie on Sunday 1st of March 2026 01:41:08 PM
Shreddie, you read my mind. I was checking Felixs score this morning and thinking - picking the Wimbledon wildcard this year is going to be seriously tough.
The premier prize is, of course, the 8 men's singles wildcards at Wimbledon. In 2025, those went to: (Jay Clarke, Oli Crawford, Dan Evans, Arthur Fery, George Loffhagen, Johannus Monday, JPJ and Henry Searle).
Right now, on rankings, they would go to: (Jan Choinski, JPJ, Billy Harris, Arthur Fery, Jay Clarke, Oli Crawford, Dan Evans and George Loffhagen).
But much could change, especially if Jake doesn't arrest his slump and needs a MDWC, if Jan or JPJ qualify and win a match or two at Indian Wells/Miami. Loffers hasn't quite clicked since narrowly missing out on qualifying for the AO, and if Toby and Felix's rise continues, both could be well into the top 200 by June. Can't see Henry getting another look-in.
Then there's the 8 qualies WCs - in 2025 those went to: (Oli Bonding, Paul Jubb, Ryan Peniston, Oli Tarvet and 4 winners from the WC playoffs - Hamish Stewart, Ali Gray, James Story and Giles Hussey, with 1 WC going to the previous year's junior champ).
Assuming it's the same this year, then right now it could be QWCs for Ryan, Toby, JoMo and Felix, and then a crazily competitive bunfight in the playoffs).
We could really use a couple of the top guys sneaking in automatically... free up some wildcards! Could be more than ever in qualifying though!
Definitely, and having a few more guys in the top 220 as well, so those who miss out on MDWCs will get direct entries for Wimbledon qualies, freeing up more QWCs.
Going to be brutally tough for the grass court ATPs as well. Queens has three MDWCs (assuming at the moment those would go to Jake, Jan and JPJ). And 3 QWCs (Billy, Arthur and Jay).
Still - means that the grass court challengers happening at the same time are going to be stacked with British interest
Agree with the above. Helpfully someone can move up into the MD as of right and free up a wild card.
It may be fascinating that some of the above dont even get a look in in qualifying.
Yeah for sure - maybe Oli Tarvet will get a MDWC as well, after his heroics in 2025, meaning there's even less for the rest.
Crazy that players like Harry who's had a phenomenal breakout year, and Charlie/Liam, who have done so well to get their rankings back up, are unlikely to get direct qualies WCs as it stands, and are still going to need the playoffs.
Either way it is very interesting and might change weekly! They I think will really need to think more leading upto and into Wimbledon... feel like last year we weren't anywhere near as stacked like we are now.
For the qualis wildcards, they give one to the 18U national champion, so that's one less on offer
Although I think it's only two from the play-offs that are guaranteed, no? (Or is it only one?) The four from last year was purely coincidental, so to speak, that's for sure
But Mark Ceban is the highest ranked junior and, assuming he wins, just based on ranking, he'll have one
You'll also have to keep an eye on the US college championships
For the qualis wildcards, they give one to the 18U national champion, so that's one less on offer
Although I think it's only two from the play-offs that are guaranteed, no? (Or is it only one?) The four from last year was purely coincidental, so to speak, that's for sure
But Mark Ceban is the highest ranked junior and, assuming he wins, just based on ranking, he'll have one
You'll also have to keep an eye on the US college championships
Agreed - they give two as the rule from playoffs and make up with more if needed. Agree re national juniors and college also.
almost not worth trying to guess is my view - Id be inclined to just go down the rankings, thats fair and reasonable, for both main and qualifying wild cards
For the qualis wildcards, they give one to the 18U national champion, so that's one less on offer
Although I think it's only two from the play-offs that are guaranteed, no? (Or is it only one?) The four from last year was purely coincidental, so to speak, that's for sure
But Mark Ceban is the highest ranked junior and, assuming he wins, just based on ranking, he'll have one
You'll also have to keep an eye on the US college championships
Agreed - they give two as the rule from playoffs and make up with more if needed. Agree re national juniors and college also.
almost not worth trying to guess is my view - Id be inclined to just go down the rankings, thats fair and reasonable, for both main and qualifying wild cards
But age and funding status will matter too - not just ranking
i.e. Henry Searle has a very good chance of a wildcard (into main draw or into qualis), no matter if he's not there on ranking
For the qualis wildcards, they give one to the 18U national champion, so that's one less on offer
Although I think it's only two from the play-offs that are guaranteed, no? (Or is it only one?) The four from last year was purely coincidental, so to speak, that's for sure
But Mark Ceban is the highest ranked junior and, assuming he wins, just based on ranking, he'll have one
You'll also have to keep an eye on the US college championships
Agreed - they give two as the rule from playoffs and make up with more if needed. Agree re national juniors and college also.
almost not worth trying to guess is my view - Id be inclined to just go down the rankings, thats fair and reasonable, for both main and qualifying wild cards
But age and funding status will matter too - not just ranking
i.e. Henry Searle has a very good chance of a wildcard (into main draw or into qualis), no matter if he's not there on ranking
Im sure youre right, but Im just saying IMO, with players so close, id persinally motivate them / be fair to them by just going down the rankings. Players like Charles Broom and Giles Hussey get little press around their achievements and yet they are right up there, Ali Gray also. If they get a ranking spot to put them in the top X of qualies wildcard worthy players, Id reward that.
But realise that is naive and other things come into play - my brain starts hurting at that point, Ill just watch from the sides!
Could Dan use PR instead of WC? (Not sure how long he has been out for)
Courtesy of Madadman on Dan's dedicated thread:
Could easily be a full 6 months for Dan so he gets a PR on return. Even the beginning of January is only 4 months. The general recovery will probably be done by then but getting it strong enough to play pro tennis is probably another little while.