I love seeing a lower ranked player enjoy some success. There is nothing in his recent results that suggest he would be capable of such a run. He has almost doubled his prize money for the year and his ranking will jump from outside the top 200 to 130. Somehow I feel Holger Rube will be too strong for him in the next round. So Mr Vacherot, is this week a flash in the pan or are you going to back it up with some more decent results?
I love seeing a lower ranked player enjoy some success. There is nothing in his recent results that suggest he would be capable of such a run. He has almost doubled his prize money for the year and his ranking will jump from outside the top 200 to 130. Somehow I feel Holger Rube will be too strong for him in the next round. So Mr Vacherot, is this week a flash in the pan or are you going to back it up with some more decent results?
There are one or two Monagasque players on the Tour and doing ok at the moment - Arneodo in doubles and Hugo Nys is also a handy doubles player as well.
Not sure if they are genuinely from Monaco or French transplants but it is the first time in some time that I have seen that small country/principality pop up at the top tier
-- Edited by JonH comes home on Wednesday 8th of October 2025 05:31:16 PM
Amazing story - he is now up to a live rank of 92, started the event at 204.
He won a few challengers in Asia last year, his CH is 110, so he has obviously been relatively high and dropped. This year, not so much, got a wild card into Monte Carlo and beat Struff round one; lost to Hamish Stewart at Wimbledon qualies, albeit Vacherot retired when he was about to lose that one; but hasn't achieved anything to suggest he would reach a M1000 semi.
Ha, so while Shanghai is much slower this year compared to 2017, all the other masters surfaces are quicker, some much quicker.
And it feels to me contradicts Federer's feeling that the tournaments have slowed down surfaces to enable a Sinner and Alcaraz final - doesnt tally with all of them speeding things up?!
The index only seems to be used for Masters 1000 events, not sure if there is anything available for the 4 Grand Slam events or Tour Finals - Tennis Abstract has a different methodology to come up with broadly similar results though, covering all ATP Tour events, from Slams down to ATP 250 events.
Here is a comparison between CPI and TA surface speed ratings, they are similar but not exactly the same - probably IW is seen to be slower by TA, and Canada also, but not by much
Indian Wells - CPI 30.9 (medium slow); TA rating 0.73 (slow) - rating it slower than the CPI rating
I feel sure that this has been remarked on previously, but it is not easy to sea ch for. Currently, 5 of the world's top 10 doubles players are Brits. Remarkable!