British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Weeks 31 & 32 - ATP Masters 1000 (National Bank Open) - Toronto, Canada (hard)


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 109
Date:
Weeks 31 & 32 - ATP Masters 1000 (National Bank Open) - Toronto, Canada (hard)


Ficovic didn't seem to mind.

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Online
Posts: 410
Date:

Fearnley loses 6-2 6-3. He was awful for the most part. This is the first bump in the road for him really since his meteoric rise. Be interesting to see how he manages it.

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2463
Date:

Jake just lost heavily to the far lower ranked qualifier in straight sets. I didnt watch the match, so all I have to go on are the stats. He failed to generate a single break point in the entire match. And faced a heap of BPs seemingly throughout. Low serve percentages across the piece. His opponent is an Argentinian journeyman who has been around for quite a while and never had a ranking inside the top 120. And I rather though Jakes preferred surface was hard courts, given his US college background. His rise up the rankings, and style of play until the French open has been nothing short of incredible. When he lost to Cam at the French there were flashes of absolute genius, but overall it was a very poor display and his double faulting was just off the charts - not something hed really been prone to previously. The grass court swing was, unfortunately, more of the same. Is there something thats changed since late May that might explain this blip, is this an inevitable lull after 12 months of uninterrupted success, or are there technical/coaching/external factors at play. He seems a very different player over the last 2-3 months. Wish him well, and Im sure its all part of his journey, but any insights that shed light on recent results?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 47231
Date:

That is a real shame, hoped for more from Jake. That said, he beat Cobolli at Queens, the Italian is currently ranked 18, and he beat Moutet who has been on form recently.

Whilst today is a poor result, I am not sure the grass was that bad, average really. I am not writing Jake off just yet!!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 62411
Date:

korriban wrote:

Jake just lost heavily to the far lower ranked qualifier in straight sets. I didnt watch the match, so all I have to go on are the stats. He failed to generate a single break point in the entire match. And faced a heap of BPs seemingly throughout. Low serve percentages across the piece. His opponent is an Argentinian journeyman who has been around for quite a while and never had a ranking inside the top 120. And I rather though Jakes preferred surface was hard courts, given his US college background. His rise up the rankings, and style of play until the French open has been nothing short of incredible. When he lost to Cam at the French there were flashes of absolute genius, but overall it was a very poor display and his double faulting was just off the charts - not something hed really been prone to previously. The grass court swing was, unfortunately, more of the same. Is there something thats changed since late May that might explain this blip, is this an inevitable lull after 12 months of uninterrupted success, or are there technical/coaching/external factors at play. He seems a very different player over the last 2-3 months. Wish him well, and Im sure its all part of his journey, but any insights that shed light on recent results?


For the record:

L96:  (Q) Juan Pablo Ficovic (ARG) WR 137 defeated Jacob Fearnley WR 55 by 2 & 3  bleh



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 42687
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:

That is a real shame, hoped for more from Jake. That said, he beat Cobolli at Queens, the Italian is currently ranked 18, and he beat Moutet who has been on form recently.

Whilst today is a poor result, I am not sure the grass was that bad, average really. I am not writing Jake off just yet!!


Yes, it would be a bit weird to write Jake off - just yet or for quite some time to come.

Just like korriban though I find it a bit perplexing. Hopefully though he can reasonably soon get back to his previous form and then build on 



-- Edited by indiana on Sunday 27th of July 2025 11:19:14 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 47231
Date:

indiana wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:

That is a real shame, hoped for more from Jake. That said, he beat Cobolli at Queens, the Italian is currently ranked 18, and he beat Moutet who has been on form recently.

Whilst today is a poor result, I am not sure the grass was that bad, average really. I am not writing Jake off just yet!!


Yes, it would be a bit weird to write Jake off. 

Just like korriban though I find it a bit perplexing. Hopefully though he can reasonably soon get back to his previous form and then build on it.


 It is but, just like we have seen with the recent returns to form from Cam and Dan after periods of quite dire form (relatively), and then suddenly they bounce back. Confidence, just something clicking, maybe something in their private lives that is holding them back? Who knows, but I have faith Jake will get it again (and his dip so far isnt anywhere near Cam or Dan's!)  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 47231
Date:

And Jake did get PoM nominations in May and June, so very recently, for his Madrid performance and then Rome in May, and then his French run to round 3, and a run to the last 8 of Queens.

It was Eastbourne (after beating Cobolli) where he lost to Giron (sorry, was massacred by Giron) and Wimbledon (lost to Fonseca - can forgive that) and then here that didnt go so well, and here, that is over just one month of elapsed time.

It is 3 poor losses on the trot versus Giron, Fonseca and this Argentine chap, and 3 matches on the trot, so not good - but in context, the guy is doing amazingly well!

__________________


Junior player

Status: Offline
Posts: 78
Date:

Saw the first set. Jake was lacklustre rather than poor - it always looked as if there was only going to be one winner cry



__________________


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2099
Date:

It's Jake's second full year on tour and you know what they same about the sophomore slump...I'm sure it's just a bad patch.

__________________


Social player

Status: Offline
Posts: 26
Date:

LordBrownof wrote:

It's Jake's second full year on tour and you know what they same about the sophomore slump...I'm sure it's just a bad patch.


 2025 is set to be Jake's first full year on tour



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 26354
Date:

mazzy wrote:
LordBrownof wrote:

It's Jake's second full year on tour and you know what they same about the sophomore slump...I'm sure it's just a bad patch.


 2025 is set to be Jake's first full year on tour


 Depends whether you are talking about calendar year, or 12 months. He really started on tour with the 2024 grass season



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 47231
Date:

Jake had played 40 matches on tour by Wimbledon this year, 42 now. Keep that up and he would have hit 80 by season end near enough. Not Billy proportions , but a lot of matches for a year one pro and with all the travel. I reckon he hit a wall and probably needs a little mental break. May not have much chance to get another one but maybe being back in the US will help him over the next few weeks.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 62411
Date:

L64:  Aleksandar Vukic (AUS) WR 99 (CH = 48 in August 2023) vs (31) Cameron Norrie WR 39



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 62411
Date:

L32:  Marcelo Melo & Alexander Zverev (BRA/GER) CR 395 (53+342) vs  (6) Joe Salisbury & Neal Skupski CR 30 (16+14)

L32:  (3) Harri Heliövaara (FIN) & Henry Patten CR 10 (5+5) vs Lorenzo Musetti & Lorenzo Sonego (ITA/ITA) CR 487 (253+234)

L32:  Flavio Cobolli & Alejandro Davidovich (ITA/ESP) CR 607 (185+422) vs (2) Julian Cash & Lloyd Glasspool CR 7 (4+3)



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard