Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 18 - ITF W100 - Gifu, Japan - Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 24897
Date:
Week 18 - ITF W100 - Gifu, Japan - Hard


Heather only has 5 points to drop from the remaining clay court tournaments from last year. Her next large drop is 30 points from Nottingham in June, so if she keeps playing she will rise even more.

And I agree, Heather will get her MDWC for Wimbledon - and probably others for the grass court season.

__________________


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 327
Date:

the addict wrote:


QF:- Emina Bektas (USA) / Yuriko Lily Miyazaki (GBR) (227+312) def Hong Yi Cody Wong (HKG) / Lin Zhu (CHN) CR637 (210+427) 6-4 6-2

*****

SF:- Emina Bektas (USA) / Yuriko Lily Miyazaki (GBR) (227+312) v I-Hsuan Cho (TPE) / Yi Tsen Cho (TPE) CR370 (185+185)


 Just come home and found Heather's result .. biggrin

With smart choices she she could have a very tidy ranking in a few weeks time ..



__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2369
Date:

Great week for Heather.

__________________

GO TEAM GBR IN 2025!



Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 780
Date:

the addict wrote:

Played indoors

QF:- Heather Watson (GBR) WR192 def Wushuang Zheng (CHN) WR270 [Q6] 6-3 3-6 6-2

*****

SF:- Heather Watson (GBR) WR192 v Mananchaya Sawangkaew (THA) WR113 [3]


 SF:- Heather Watson (GBR) WR192 LOST TO Mananchaya Sawangkaew (THA) WR113 [3] 4-6 5-7



__________________

She/her



Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 780
Date:

the addict wrote:


QF:- Emina Bektas (USA) / Yuriko Lily Miyazaki (GBR) (227+312) def Hong Yi Cody Wong (HKG) / Lin Zhu (CHN) CR637 (210+427) 6-4 6-2

*****

SF:- Emina Bektas (USA) / Yuriko Lily Miyazaki (GBR) (227+312) v I-Hsuan Cho (TPE) / Yi Tsen Cho (TPE) CR370 (185+185)


 SF:- Emina Bektas (USA) / Yuriko Lily Miyazaki (GBR) (227+312) DEFEATED I-Hsuan Cho (TPE) / Yi Tsen Cho (TPE) CR370 (185+185) 6-1 6-3



__________________

She/her



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10922
Date:

Shame but Hev wasn't far off. A good fortnights work.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 24897
Date:

F:- Emina Bektas (USA) / Yuriko Lily Miyazaki (GBR) CR539 (227+312) v Momoko Kobori (JPN) / Ayano Shimizu (JPN) [2] CR325 (166+159)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 56835
Date:

Lily is down for the Nottingham II event in the UK next week - that's going to be a scramble

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 24897
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Lily is down for the Nottingham II event in the UK next week - that's going to be a scramble


 She would be top seed, and probably wouldn't have to play until Wednesday. Still a very quick turn round though.



__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 699
Date:

Lambda wrote:

I didn't think a main draw wild card for Wimby was ever in doubt. She's still very popular with the public and media that, as long as she's in the top 200 and its not needed for others, I would think she would always get a main draw wild card.


 It should be though.  I like Heather and she's been a more than decent servant to GB tennis but it is time to look to the future now. She doesn't need the money and a wildcard for a younger player would give them some finances to invest in their future.

Yes she's done ok this week but let's be honest she's basically had to travel around the world to compete in a pretty low quality tournament which is fine and she's perfectly entitled to do so and you can only beat the player on the other side of the net.  

I daresay she will get a load of wildcards to the other UK grass tournaments so the public will get plenty of chance to see her.  I know this will be an unpopular opinion but as I'm generally against wild cards for the grand slams anyway, if we are going to have them I'd like to see them given to younger players to see if the money and experience can help future careers.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 41919
Date:

I have also always been against MD WCs in Slams.

But I've long ago accepted that they are not going anywhere so we may as well use them very biasedly for home players as the other Slams do, with probably a mix of up and coming big prospects and still decently ranked much more established players. So I'd be absolutely fine with Heather, a player who has entertained and won MD matches in the past ( including L16 just 3 years ago ) getting a MD WC if top 200 and indeed likely to be one of our top 3 or 4 ranked players without a direct entry.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 56835
Date:

I love wildcards

And although I normally would never rush home to watch a Heather match, I'd definitely give one to Heather for several reasons, some of which overlap:

(a) the crowd like her (or at least recognise her ....) - I was at one event, can't remember, and SO many people were saying to each other, when's Heather playing? Which court is Heather on? etc etc

(b) wildcards are not just to help up-and-coming players - sponsors, the press, the crowd .... all matter

(b) I'm a mega fan of juniors but I don't like the kick the can down the road approach, there's always something better just round the corner

(c) I think giving wildcards to older players sends a very good message to younger players - it shows that the bods will invest in your throughout your career, not just when you're a new young thing

__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2369
Date:

I agree with you coup droit.

I also love WCs. Gives a level of excitement to the tournament.

Lets be honest, at the moment except for Heather and Jodie and possibly Harriet. Whos even in line for a Wimbledon MD WC?

__________________

GO TEAM GBR IN 2025!



Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2369
Date:

Just remembered about Fran too for MD WC

__________________

GO TEAM GBR IN 2025!



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 24897
Date:

Lily would be next in line, live ranked 244. Whilst others could be given a MDWC it would a real surprise if they won a match and possibly too much of a step up. But there may be too many that deserve a shot at qualifying, so there could be a surprise or two (such as Millie or Marni or the top juniors)

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard