Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 25 - LTA Wimbledon Wild Card Play Offs - Wimbledon (Grass)


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39761
Date:
Week 25 - LTA Wimbledon Wild Card Play Offs - Wimbledon (Grass)


Thought it deserved a thread of its own

https://competitions.lta.org.uk/sport/tournament/draw?id=224739ED-902A-4B4B-92CA-9B0C44E95719&draw=2

 



-- Edited by JonH comes home on Thursday 20th of June 2024 07:24:58 AM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 22177
Date:
Week 25 - LTA Wimbledon Wild Card Play Offs - Roehampton (Grass)


Katy Dunne WR314 [1] v Alice Gillan WR713
Sophie Drakeford-Lewis [WC] v Gabia Paskauskas [WC]

Tara Moore [PR] v Isabelle Lacy WR955
Freya Christie WR761 v Naiktha Bains WR506 [3]

Beth Grey WR358 [2] v Amelia Rajecki WR884
Eliz Maloney WR1024 v Brooke Black [WC]

Allegra Korpanec Davies [WC] v Hephzibah Oluwadare [WC]
Victoria Allen [WC] v Katie Swan WR514 [4]


__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 22177
Date:

One or two surprises in there, and some big matches in prospect

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39761
Date:

Beth and Millie feels like the standout opening match

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39761
Date:

And great to see Tara in there

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10570
Date:

6 wildcards does feel like an awful lot when you see the draw of 16 typed out. Although not that the next entrants on the reserve list (Emma and Holly) would have changed the overall shape of the draw.

I don't think it's a particularly strong year to be honest. With injuries and lack of form that top half is really pretty weak when on paper you think it should be quite good quality with the names involved. Hopefully Katy's body holds together enough to get through, although Sophie would make a super story. I suspect Naiktha takes it.

Interesting Swan is testing herself here, but it seems a mistake to me. If she makes it through she will lose the eligibility she's been building up for a SR having not played since February, which will be handy for the autumn. And I'm not sure she's ready for a proper tour return yet? Feels like winner of Beth vs Amelia take this half, the other girls here are nowhere near GS Qualies level (as much as I rate Hep she's not ready and I am glad Vic has popped up).



-- Edited by PaulM on Wednesday 19th of June 2024 08:54:59 PM

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:

PaulM wrote:

6 wildcards does feel like an awful lot when you see the draw of 16 typed out. Although not that the next entrants on the reserve list (Emma and Holly) would have changed the overall shape of the draw.

I don't think it's a particularly strong year to be honest. With injuries and lack of form that top half is really pretty weak when on paper you think it should be quite good quality with the names involved. Hopefully Katy's body holds together enough to get through, although Sophie would make a super story. I suspect Naiktha takes it.

Interesting Swan is testing herself here, but it seems a mistake to me. If she makes it through she will lose the eligibility she's been building up for a SR having not played since February, which will be handy for the autumn. And I'm not sure she's ready for a proper tour return yet? Feels like winner of Beth vs Amelia take this half, the other girls here are nowhere near GS Qualies level (as much as I rate Hep she's not ready and I am glad Vic has popped up).



-- Edited by PaulM on Wednesday 19th of June 2024 08:54:59 PM


Does participation in this play-off comp (and potentially the qualies too) actually count against SR eligibility?



__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2321
Date:

foobarbaz wrote:

PaulM wrote:

6 wildcards does feel like an awful lot when you see the draw of 16 typed out. Although not that the next entrants on the reserve list (Emma and Holly) would have changed the overall shape of the draw.

I don't think it's a particularly strong year to be honest. With injuries and lack of form that top half is really pretty weak when on paper you think it should be quite good quality with the names involved. Hopefully Katy's body holds together enough to get through, although Sophie would make a super story. I suspect Naiktha takes it.

Interesting Swan is testing herself here, but it seems a mistake to me. If she makes it through she will lose the eligibility she's been building up for a SR having not played since February, which will be handy for the autumn. And I'm not sure she's ready for a proper tour return yet? Feels like winner of Beth vs Amelia take this half, the other girls here are nowhere near GS Qualies level (as much as I rate Hep she's not ready and I am glad Vic has popped up).



-- Edited by PaulM on Wednesday 19th of June 2024 08:54:59 PM


Does participation in this play-off comp (and potentially the qualies too) actually count against SR eligibility?



I thought it did unless a waiver was granted, but as usual making sense of the rules requires a PhD.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39761
Date:

Lambda wrote:
foobarbaz wrote:

 

PaulM wrote:

6 wildcards does feel like an awful lot when you see the draw of 16 typed out. Although not that the next entrants on the reserve list (Emma and Holly) would have changed the overall shape of the draw.

I don't think it's a particularly strong year to be honest. With injuries and lack of form that top half is really pretty weak when on paper you think it should be quite good quality with the names involved. Hopefully Katy's body holds together enough to get through, although Sophie would make a super story. I suspect Naiktha takes it.

Interesting Swan is testing herself here, but it seems a mistake to me. If she makes it through she will lose the eligibility she's been building up for a SR having not played since February, which will be handy for the autumn. And I'm not sure she's ready for a proper tour return yet? Feels like winner of Beth vs Amelia take this half, the other girls here are nowhere near GS Qualies level (as much as I rate Hep she's not ready and I am glad Vic has popped up).



-- Edited by PaulM on Wednesday 19th of June 2024 08:54:59 PM


Does participation in this play-off comp (and potentially the qualies too) actually count against SR eligibility?



I thought it did unless a waiver was granted, but as usual making sense of the rules requires a PhD.


 Given the LTA could pull the event at any point and declare players in to qualies etc (eg last year they forewent the semis - is forewent a word??!) then do they actual have any official status at all - they are just a domestic event like a British Tour event or more like the UKPL? So would it have an impact on SR or anything else that could be impacted, such as win/loss record or head to head, earnings (is there any prizemoney?)  



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 22177
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
Lambda wrote:
foobarbaz wrote:

 

PaulM wrote:

6 wildcards does feel like an awful lot when you see the draw of 16 typed out. Although not that the next entrants on the reserve list (Emma and Holly) would have changed the overall shape of the draw.

I don't think it's a particularly strong year to be honest. With injuries and lack of form that top half is really pretty weak when on paper you think it should be quite good quality with the names involved. Hopefully Katy's body holds together enough to get through, although Sophie would make a super story. I suspect Naiktha takes it.

Interesting Swan is testing herself here, but it seems a mistake to me. If she makes it through she will lose the eligibility she's been building up for a SR having not played since February, which will be handy for the autumn. And I'm not sure she's ready for a proper tour return yet? Feels like winner of Beth vs Amelia take this half, the other girls here are nowhere near GS Qualies level (as much as I rate Hep she's not ready and I am glad Vic has popped up).



-- Edited by PaulM on Wednesday 19th of June 2024 08:54:59 PM


Does participation in this play-off comp (and potentially the qualies too) actually count against SR eligibility?



I thought it did unless a waiver was granted, but as usual making sense of the rules requires a PhD.


 Given the LTA could pull the event at any point and declare players in to qualies etc (eg last year they forewent the semis - is forewent a word??!) then do they actual have any official status at all - they are just a domestic event like a British Tour event or more like the UKPL? So would it have an impact on SR or anything else that could be impacted, such as win/loss record or head to head, earnings (is there any prizemoney?)  


 When I read PaulM's original post I took it to mean actually making it through to the main qualifying event - which of course has ranking points and prize money. The rulebook is a bit vague over what constitutes a relevant tennis event though.



__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2321
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:

Lambda wrote:
foobarbaz wrote:

 

PaulM wrote:

6 wildcards does feel like an awful lot when you see the draw of 16 typed out. Although not that the next entrants on the reserve list (Emma and Holly) would have changed the overall shape of the draw.

I don't think it's a particularly strong year to be honest. With injuries and lack of form that top half is really pretty weak when on paper you think it should be quite good quality with the names involved. Hopefully Katy's body holds together enough to get through, although Sophie would make a super story. I suspect Naiktha takes it.

Interesting Swan is testing herself here, but it seems a mistake to me. If she makes it through she will lose the eligibility she's been building up for a SR having not played since February, which will be handy for the autumn. And I'm not sure she's ready for a proper tour return yet? Feels like winner of Beth vs Amelia take this half, the other girls here are nowhere near GS Qualies level (as much as I rate Hep she's not ready and I am glad Vic has popped up).



-- Edited by PaulM on Wednesday 19th of June 2024 08:54:59 PM


Does participation in this play-off comp (and potentially the qualies too) actually count against SR eligibility?



I thought it did unless a waiver was granted, but as usual making sense of the rules requires a PhD.


 Given the LTA could pull the event at any point and declare players in to qualies etc (eg last year they forewent the semis - is forewent a word??!) then do they actual have any official status at all - they are just a domestic event like a British Tour event or more like the UKPL? So would it have an impact on SR or anything else that could be impacted, such as win/loss record or head to head, earnings (is there any prizemoney?)  




The rules state that playing in any tennis event that includes 1 or more players that compete in professional tennis tournaments, whether they receive renumeration or not, counts as a return to competition These events include single-day, multiple-day, week-long, and seasonal team-oriented competitions, as well as charity events

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4945
Date:

Also surprised Swan has turned up here! Horrible draw for Beth Grey who performed admirably in qualies (2 years?) ago. Naiktha always a threat on grass and very interested to see how SDL goes!

__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 505
Date:

Lambda wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:

 

Lambda wrote:
foobarbaz wrote:

 

PaulM wrote:

6 wildcards does feel like an awful lot when you see the draw of 16 typed out. Although not that the next entrants on the reserve list (Emma and Holly) would have changed the overall shape of the draw.

I don't think it's a particularly strong year to be honest. With injuries and lack of form that top half is really pretty weak when on paper you think it should be quite good quality with the names involved. Hopefully Katy's body holds together enough to get through, although Sophie would make a super story. I suspect Naiktha takes it.

Interesting Swan is testing herself here, but it seems a mistake to me. If she makes it through she will lose the eligibility she's been building up for a SR having not played since February, which will be handy for the autumn. And I'm not sure she's ready for a proper tour return yet? Feels like winner of Beth vs Amelia take this half, the other girls here are nowhere near GS Qualies level (as much as I rate Hep she's not ready and I am glad Vic has popped up).



-- Edited by PaulM on Wednesday 19th of June 2024 08:54:59 PM


Does participation in this play-off comp (and potentially the qualies too) actually count against SR eligibility?



I thought it did unless a waiver was granted, but as usual making sense of the rules requires a PhD.


 Given the LTA could pull the event at any point and declare players in to qualies etc (eg last year they forewent the semis - is forewent a word??!) then do they actual have any official status at all - they are just a domestic event like a British Tour event or more like the UKPL? So would it have an impact on SR or anything else that could be impacted, such as win/loss record or head to head, earnings (is there any prizemoney?)  



 


The rules state that playing in any tennis event that includes 1 or more players that compete in professional tennis tournaments, whether they receive renumeration or not, counts as a return to competition These events include single-day, multiple-day, week-long, and seasonal team-oriented competitions, as well as charity events


 Perhaps there's some leeway depending on the type of injury? Otherwise how is a player able to test their progress to return to competition?



__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 551
Date:

If Katie S is fit, then she should easily have the quality to come through. Don't forget that she came through the Wimbledon qualifiers a couple of years ago and if the op to remove the trapped nerve and back spasms has been successful, then maybe she could actually have a chance in qualifying. It's surely better to be playing than sitting there and waiting for an SR, especially as I think her ranking has sat around the 300 mark for some time because of her injuries, so it's not like she would be given entry into the elite tournaments anyway.



-- Edited by Andy Parker on Thursday 20th of June 2024 01:49:09 AM

__________________
Andy Parker


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3350
Date:

Andy Parker wrote:

If Katie S is fit, then she should easily have the quality to come through. Don't forget that she came through the Wimbledon qualifiers a couple of years ago and if the op to remove the trapped nerve and back spasms has been successful, then maybe she could actually have a chance in qualifying. It's surely better to be playing than sitting there and waiting for an SR, especially as I think her ranking has sat around the 300 mark for some time because of her injuries, so it's not like she would be given entry into the elite tournaments anyway.



-- Edited by Andy Parker on Thursday 20th of June 2024 01:49:09 AM


 I agree.  If it was any other time of the year then there could be an argument for waiting out the 6 months but it's Wimbledon and with her injury record she wouldn't want to risk waiting another year for an opportunity to play there if she feels she is fit enough to compete now.



__________________
1 2 38  >  Last»  | Page of 8  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard