Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Link Back -> Andrew Murray message board -> British women discussion section -> Week 25 - WTA250 - Birmingham, Great Britain Grass
Post Info TOPIC: Week 25 - WTA250 - Birmingham, Great Britain Grass
dodrade


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1503
Date:
RE: Week 25 - WTA250 - Birmingham, Great Britain Grass
Permalink  

the addict wrote:

Mertens retires at 3-6 0-3 which leaves Katie secure at WR32

 Does that mean she'd play Iga in R3?



__________________
the addict


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23244
Date:
Permalink  

dodrade wrote:
the addict wrote:

Mertens retires at 3-6 0-3 which leaves Katie secure at WR32

 Does that mean she'd play Iga in R3?

 No, she would play any one of the top eight seeds depending on the draw. There is a set procedure for placing the seeds in the draw as set out in the Grand Slam Rulebook



-- Edited by the addict on Friday 21st of June 2024 06:44:14 AM

__________________
Bagel


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 242
Date:
Permalink  

dodrade wrote:
the addict wrote:

Mertens retires at 3-6 0-3 which leaves Katie secure at WR32

 Does that mean she'd play Iga in R3?

 No, seeded positions are drawn for. I think No 32 seed would  have a potential R3 match against any of the top 8 seeds.



__________________
Dannythomas


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 186
Date:
Permalink  

Bagel wrote:
dodrade wrote:
the addict wrote:

Mertens retires at 3-6 0-3 which leaves Katie secure at WR32

 Does that mean she'd play Iga in R3?

 No, seeded positions are drawn for. I think No 32 seed would  have a potential R3 match against any of the top 8 seeds.

One match at a time Just like the England football team no



__________________
LordBrownof


Futures level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1963
Date:
Permalink  

Bagel wrote:
dodrade wrote:
the addict wrote:

Mertens retires at 3-6 0-3 which leaves Katie secure at WR32

 Does that mean she'd play Iga in R3?

 No, seeded positions are drawn for. I think No 32 seed would  have a potential R3 match against any of the top 8 seeds.

 Let's hope for Paolini then :)



__________________
Barefoot


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 243
Date:
Permalink  

Or Sakkari! Or to be honest Iga would be better than a lot of the top 8.

__________________
the addict


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23244
Date:
Permalink  

QF: Tereza Mihalikova (SVK) & Olivia Nicholls CR 129 (58+71) lost to Asia Muhammad (USA) / Aldila Sutjiadi (INA) CR66 (34+32) 6-3 3-6 6-10  cry



__________________
dodrade


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1503
Date:
Permalink  

the addict wrote:
dodrade wrote:
the addict wrote:

Mertens retires at 3-6 0-3 which leaves Katie secure at WR32

 Does that mean she'd play Iga in R3?

 No, she would play any one of the top eight seeds depending on the draw. There is a set procedure for placing the seeds in the draw as set out in the Grand Slam Rulebook



-- Edited by the addict on Friday 21st of June 2024 06:44:14 AM

 Thanks, I assumed if matches went with seeding no.1 played no.32 in R3, no.16 in R4, no.8 in QF, no.4 in SF and no.2 in the final.



__________________
indiana


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40759
Date:
Permalink  

dodrade wrote:
the addict wrote:
dodrade wrote:
the addict wrote:

Mertens retires at 3-6 0-3 which leaves Katie secure at WR32

 Does that mean she'd play Iga in R3?

 No, she would play any one of the top eight seeds depending on the draw. There is a set procedure for placing the seeds in the draw as set out in the Grand Slam Rulebook



-- Edited by the addict on Friday 21st of June 2024 06:44:14 AM

 Thanks, I assumed if matches went with seeding no.1 played no.32 in R3, no.16 in R4, no.8 in QF, no.4 in SF and no.2 in the final.

It is seeding blocks, with an element of randomness, as in ATP and WTA tour and ITFs.

For Slams, #1 seed is placed at the top, #2 seed is placed at the bottom, then seeds 3 & 4 go randomly to the 2 halves. 

For the QF, seeds 5 to 8 are randomly bracketed with any of seeds 1 to 4.

For the L16, seeds 9 to 12 are bracketed with seeds 5 to 8 and seeds 13 to 16 bracketed with seeds 1 to 4.

For the L32, seeds 17 to 24 are bracketed with seeds 9 to 16 and seeds 25 to 32 bracketed with seeds 1 to 8.



__________________
HarryGem


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 667
Date:
Permalink  

the addict wrote:

Mertens retires at 3-6 0-3 which leaves Katie secure at WR32

 I don't know the rules so genuine question.

Muchova is set to return after a long lay off. Although she still qualifies for the tournament as of right is she not entitled to use her protected ranking, which would have been a seed thus demoting Katie by 1 more place?



-- Edited by HarryGem on Friday 21st of June 2024 01:55:44 PM

__________________
Doonan


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 357
Date:
Permalink  

I thought you could use a protected ranking to enter a tournament but not for seeding. But could be wrong.

__________________
HarryGem


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 667
Date:
Permalink  

Doonan wrote:

I thought you could use a protected ranking to enter a tournament but not for seeding. But could be wrong.

 Thanks. That seems pretty tough if so. 



__________________
steven


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:
Permalink  

Doonan wrote:

I thought you could use a protected ranking to enter a tournament but not for seeding. But could be wrong.

I can confirm that's correct.



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html
Lambda


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2632
Date:
Permalink  

HarryGem wrote:

Doonan wrote:

I thought you could use a protected ranking to enter a tournament but not for seeding. But could be wrong.

 Thanks. That seems pretty tough if so. 


The above is correct for a Grand Slam.
For WTA tournaments (except draws of 48 and 96), a player with a top 100 protected ranking who would be a seed with the protected ranking will be an additional seed. This doesn't displace anyone that is a seed on their normal ranking. The additional seed will be placed in the draw so they don't play a seeded player in the 1st round.

__________________
Lambda


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2632
Date:
Permalink  

9vicman wrote:

the addict wrote:

Heather and Greet have given a walkover to Kato and Zhang in their doubles quarter final

 So that's back-to-back walkovers Heather has given in doubles having won her first match. Do we know if it's her on one/both occasions?


It was Heather that withdrew on both occasions. Official reason given as back injury in Notts and just injury in Bham.

__________________
«First  <  1 … 8 9 10 11  >  Last»  | Page of 11  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Link Back -> Andrew Murray message board -> British women discussion section -> Week 25 - WTA250 - Birmingham, Great Britain Grass
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard